Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2004: Hillary Clinton goes all-in for Kerry and Edwards despite hurting own political interests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:56 PM
Original message
2004: Hillary Clinton goes all-in for Kerry and Edwards despite hurting own political interests
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 03:57 PM by Proud2BAmurkin
I thought Kerry was a backstabbing asshole for endorsing someone other than Edwards but this proves it. She even gave Kerry her extensive lists and fund raisers

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/10/politics/campaign/10hillary.html?ex=1247198400&en=6f3cd1d747ce2ce2&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland

"I cannot even imagine four more years of this," Mrs. Clinton continued. "But we have an alternative. We can elect John Kerry and John Edwards and put our country back on the right track."

Although people close to the Clintons acknowledge that Mr. Edwards is positioned to be a formidable rival should Mrs. Clinton decide to run for the presidency in 2008, they contend that her main objective now is doing all she can to help defeat Republicans, from President Bush on down.

"Does this elevate Edwards? Yes," said one person who is close to the Clintons. "But she can't do anything about that. So she'll keep doing what she has been doing all along: knocking herself out for this ticket and the party."

In an interview this week, Mrs. Clinton would not entertain thoughts about what impact the Kerry-Edwards ticket would have on her own political career. "I have two overwhelming priorities: to elect Kerry-Edwards and to elect a Democratic Senate," Mrs. Clinton said.

In addition to making campaign appearances for Mr. Kerry, Mrs. Clinton has given his campaign staff access to two of her greatest political assets: a team of well-connected fund-raisers and extensive and time-proven donor lists, according to her closest advisors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember. That's why "she's my girl!" n/t
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 03:57 PM by Fredda Weinberg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Didn't Carville alert the Whitehouse that Kerry was going to
protest the Ohio vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. And even if true, what is the relevance? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Yes, according to Bob Woodward. Clinton people inside the
Kerry campaign alerted Carville about Senator Kerry possibly contesting the votes and from their Carville called his lovely whinny wife who then alerted Rove. The fix was in at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. OH PLEASE....KERRY SENT OUT A MAILER SAYING HE
NEEDED MONEY TO CONTEST THE ELECTION IN OHIO.....MANY FOLKS (NOT I) SENT HIM MONEY FOR THIS PURPOSE.....MANY FOLKS BELIEVED HIM WHEN IN THE CAMPAIGN HE WOULD FIGHT FOR AVERY VOTE AND MAKE SURE EVERY VOTE WAS COUNTED....SO WHAT HAPPENED. kERRY THE SILLY SOMBITCH CONCEDED ON WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 3, 2004 TO BUSH......KERRY SHOULD GIVE BACK WHATEVER MONEY TO THOSE PEOPLE.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Why don't you call Carville again and tell us what he says about Woodward's allegation? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. So he should return political favors instead of going with the man he thinks best?
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 03:57 PM by LittleClarkie
Even after Edwards wouldn't return his calls and Hillary jumped on the "botched joke" bandwagon?

That sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. if he thought Obama was best why didn't he pick him for VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. What the heck are you talking about.
I'm talking about now, and who's best for PRESIDENT, not four years ago and who's best for VICE PRESIDENT. Two different things. Apples... oranges...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. the vice president is supposed to be the one who can step into the shoes of president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Welcome to today.
Four years ago, Obama was someone who'd given a speech and hadn't even been elected to office yet.

It was not the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. He didn't know Mr. Obama that well back in 2004. He was a newcomer to the Senate.
Senator Kerry did however, recognize his talents and knew that he was a gifted and up and coming leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's how families work. Why shouldn't we return favors? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Isn't Obama part of the family as well?
Maybe Kerry just thinks Obama is the man for the job. Looking at his reasons, they made sense to me considering what I know about Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. I question Kerry's judgment now, as I did 4 years ago, though
I contributed to campaign. I did so after listening to his wife describe his valor in Vietnam, but it was nowhere to be witnessed when the swift boaters attacked. So, who should I believe now? A confirmed loser, or the candidate who has won my state despite everything the same mob threw at her?

If you think about it, there's really no reasonable alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. At this time in 2004, Kerry had already gotten the nomination.
Clinton hasn't made it to the general election yet.And, the battle for the White House was fierce in 2004. Have you every wondered why Clinton passed on running in 2004?
And, some of the reasons Kerry could not fight back as forcefully as he wanted was do to the timing of our convention, his acceptance of the nomination and general election money. Go talk to Terry McAulliffe about the timing of our convention in 2004, he did all of that arranging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary Clinton Joins In
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonite Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is not news! Kerry is always angling for political reasons!
He is a definate backstabber! He should have definatly endorsed Edwards. I mean he was the man HE chose to be his fucking V.P.!!! What the fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Maybe he would have if he couldn't gotten the man to take his fucking phone calls.
Kind of hard to offer an endorsement to someone who isn't talking to you, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
31. He also said that he endorsed whom he felt was the best person to lead this country forward and to
narrow the divide in this country. He has never said a bad word about Edwards. These are different times and they call for a different kind of leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gee, historian Douglas Brinkley says "Clintons really stuck the knife in his back a bunch of times"
From Douglas Brinkley...

Whom does the biographer think his subject will pick as a running mate? Not Hillary Rodham Clinton. Audio Link: http://www.depauw.edu/av/crain/brinkley-hillary.mp3

"There's really two different Democratic parties right now: there's the Clintons and Terry McAuliffe and the DNC and then there's the Kerry upstarts. John Kerry had one of the great advantages in life by being considered to get the nomination in December. He watched every Democrat in the country flee from him, and the Clintons really stick the knife in his back a bunch of times, so he's able to really see who was loyal to him and who wasn't. That's a very useful thing in life."

http://www.depauw.edu/news/index.asp?id=13354
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. She doesn't do anything directly anyway. She could appear to be "all in" for Kerry
and meanwhile send in her surrogates like Carville to subtly sabotage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. did she campaign in any red states for him?
I mean, could she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sen. Clinton will vote for Dem nominee when the times comes (even if not here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. You mean Hill actually supported the Democratic Party Nominee after the convention? Wow,
She should get a medal....

I'm not sure that's ever been done before by any elected memeber of the Democratic Party.

Stop the presses!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Before the Convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Isn't this distinguishable by the time of the endorsement and the inevitability of the nominee?

If Senator Clinton endorsed the obviously inevitable nominee in July of 2004 because of her commitment to elect a Democratic President, then wouldn't the corollary be Senator Kerry endorsing whoever the nominee appears to be in July of 2008 regardless of the apparent affect on his political future?

I don't see the nefariousness alluded to by this post.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protect our future Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. She and Bill did next to nothing for the 2004 Kerry campaign. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. so
Al Gore should endorse McCain/Lieberman.

It seems only right, he was his VP choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. Both the Clinton's did no more than what looked good and made sure
they got plenty of PR while doing it. All the while planning on Hillary's run this time around. You see, they actually didn't want him to win and in the end it was Clinton people who turned out to be traitors to the Kerry camp. Oh, and lets not forget Pres. Clinton's book coming out right during the thick of Kerry's campaign. And, there was Mr. Clinton, traveling around promoting his book and making sure he had the full media's attention.
Yeah, the Clinton's really went out of their way for Kerry in 2004. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
25. and Kerry defended Bill on draft dodging attacks and the blow jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. this is an example of what political whores the Clintons are
they think they are fucking owed something because they might have supported other Democrats ?

WHAT THE FUCK ? Obama supported Kerry also. many Democrats supported Kerry.

only selfish whores think they are owed something for supporting the presidential nominee of their party.

and JK defended Clinton when he was attacked for draft dodging. he held fundraisers for both Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Excuse me?
Where anywhere does Clinton (Bill or Hillary) say they feel they are "owed" something from Kerry? Do you just imply it because of the OP?

Why can't we base our arguments on facts rather than conjecture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VarnettaTuckpocket Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
34. She wasn't fooling anyone, she just shaved down her horns...
And tucked her pointy-tail down one of her pantsuit legs. But she was still the embodiment of all that is evil and wicked!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC