Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "I Can't LET myself vote for Dennis" movement: this year's big success story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:37 PM
Original message
The "I Can't LET myself vote for Dennis" movement: this year's big success story
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 07:00 PM by Ken Burch
The progresssive candidate is out of the race. He was forced out largely because those who agreed with him more than any other candidates refused to vote for him, and because many of them, for no good reason, pushed others not to do so either.

Because of this, the rest of this year's race will be much more sterile, bland and lifeless. Ideals, hopes, and the fight for a better world will have little if any place in it.

And the NEXT time we beg a Democratic politician to stand for what we truly believe in, all of them will say "screw you Charlie, look where it got Kucinich".

Happy about this, people?

Don't expect us to see anybody run for office with guts for years to come now. It's just gonna be tall, blowdried, prepackaged mushburgers.

Thanks for all your efforts. Thanks for obeying the Beltway and the CEO's.

This COULD have been a year that mattered. Now it's just a mundane, soulless effort to seek office. Great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. What the hell are you talking about?
Was 2004 not a year that mattered?

I worked MY ASS OFF for Kucinich that time around, and what was so different? Hm?

Take your lecturing bullshit elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. 2004 was a year that mattered. I didn't say it wasn't.
And I wasn't really attacking you as an individual.

It's just depressing that progressive politics(with the possible exception of Edwards, who I am now taking a hard look at) now seems to have been pretty much forced out of the race.

I hope your candidate does well in S.C. tomorrow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I'm sorry...
It's just that I also feel so awful that our choices are being narrowed... and also that it seems to be so easy for the media to have moved from marginalizing Kucinich to marginalizing one of the top three... *sigh*

Thanks... and sorry again :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks. I just now heard. It's hard news to take.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 06:51 PM by Ken Burch
As the old Scots poem put it "I'll lay me down and bleed awhile, and then I'll rise to fight again!"

God it sucks when the Beltway wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. k4k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was 100% on board with Kucinich until the "Ron Paul for VP" stuff. Then I was still 50% likely to
vote Kucinich until he endorsed Donnie McObama on the eve of the Iowa caucus.

Dennis lost my support fair and square and it had nothing to do with any "I Can't LET myself vote for Dennis" movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. There WAS no real "Ron Paul for VP" stuff.. That was a comment made by Mrs K
Who is English and didn't realize it could be misconstrued. And Dennis didn't really endorse Obama. That was media spin.

Progressives will now have to look mainly at 2010 and 2012. We'll try to get the ticket elected to get a mundane change of government, but now we'll be lucky if the platform says anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But it's easier to spread the meme
then it is to acknowledge the truth. It was a rhetorical question and as typical of Dennis, used it to illustrate a point.

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/11/the-buzz-about.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Right... it was spun all to hell...
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 06:48 PM by redqueen
but alas...

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I also hoped fervently that it was not true, but here it is on Dennis's website:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That link doesn't prove anything other than that people had heard the meme.
And with Dennis out of the race, there's no good reason for you to belabor it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Did you know follow the links to the news stories where Dennis was directly quoted? This is Dennis's
campaign blog so, if he was misquoted, don't you think he would have corrected the misquote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ken, this is not a progressive country. It is a country of corporate sycophants.
The people fear the corporations more than they love freedom and democracy. When the Romans lost their Republic, there was a serious civil war - there won't be one here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Yup. And I don't know if they 'fear' corporations, but I think they sure oughta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. I find it amazing that Kucinich won the Candidate Fun Run here
and won a couple of independent on-line polls, and yet people decided that he "couldn't win" and therefore didn't vote for him. Doesn't make sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FtWayneBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I think the news media is helping to decide who will win instead of
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 07:47 PM by FtWayneBlue
being impartial. Look at how much time they gave Hillary and Obama and Edwards in the debates compared to the others. They want a three-way, or better yet two-way race, or even to anoint the winner themselves.

(figured I better edit my 1000th post for spelling)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC