Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When Obama senses that he may lose this thing, will he go nuclear?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:10 PM
Original message
When Obama senses that he may lose this thing, will he go nuclear?
I would. I don't care for the Clintons. Fuck 'em. Rhetorically, bare-knuckle, strategically politically-wise--well, yeah, they are the shit. But what does that do to one's soul?

Anyway . . .

If I'm Obama (not that I support him either--but more so than I do Clinton), and they keep flinging the shit and then pull back and call for truce, and I'm still determined to keep crying/whining (yes, Obmama-supporters, crying/whining) about the lies, then I do two things in a sentence or two:

1) I remind everyone explicitly that Clinton lied under oath. "You know, I'd ask that we put him under oath, but history shows that doesn't mean he'll tell the truth."

Or, perhaps have some fun, and simply say that he lied to the public while wagging that finger at us: "I did not have sex with that woman." In fact, I'd use this syntax in my snarky comment. "I could have sworn I heard Hillary say, 'I did not have relations with that slum lord.'"

Whatever the case, it would be fun just fucking with them, dragging them deeper into the mud into which Obama has been drug.

Oh, yeah, just so you know--I have no nose; I cut it off in the third grade to spite my authoritarian teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. No. He doesn't want to burn bridges with people.
He may want to run again in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope, he knows he's got like 4 more runs in him and maybe a govenorship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, I think that is what he is already doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, he'll go introspective
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. 'I remind everyone explicitly that Clinton lied under oath.' Nice, who are you, Linda Tripp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks, I needed that.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That Has To Be The Worst Advice Ever Given To A Presidential Candidate
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:16 PM
Original message
Nowhere did I say that this is my advice.
Again, I have no nose. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. HeeHee - good one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Fine. Let them split hairs on camera about it. Let them complain.
And maybe we can split hairs about "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." And maybe that fucking finger wagging, a clear indication of feigned outrage and potential lying. Oh, I'm sorry, you're right according to Black's legal dictionary fellatio isn't REALLY sexual relations. Yeah, go with that. Shall we keep talking about lying.

I don't mean this as an attack on you. I'd just like to throw their own no-holds barred tactics back at them (which, in a way, I admire, and CAN'T wait to see it unleashed at the repub as I'm wearing my Vote Clinton button). It's just the nuclear button I'd be tempted to hit after hearing some of the bullshit flung at me(and the lying; and the denials).

By the way, for everyone: Go Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. unless he can prove she DID have "relations" with that slumlord
other than a snapshot from a DNC Fundraiser for Carol Mosely-Braun in the early 1990s and no record whatsoever of money donated to Hillary for any of her campaigns, he'd end up looking like a complete idiot as well as continue calling attention to his REAL connections with "that slumlord".

Perhaps you should join his campaign and offer him your sage advice? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. You might want to look into reconstructive plastic surgery.
Your noselessness seems to be marring your outlook on life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Wow.
The wit.

So damned funny.

Jesus. Stop.

Please.

Killing me.

I mean, at least insult me.

And, by the way, pecae, bro/sis. I thought that since we're in "Primaries" sharp elbows could be thrown.

I was throwing them at the Clintons, not at your mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. No, Obama would go out with grace.
That's the kind of guy he is.

But if the shoe were on the other foot, Clinton would do more than go nuclear. She would hit us with an asteroid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Time to go back under that rock now, until the next election.
Your guy has lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Well, i'll go back after I vote for the Dem. candidate.
You guys take this more seriously than I do.

Both Clintons get under my skin. Sorry, they do. I don't like triangulation. I also think they (yes, they) did some very good things. The 90s were good to me. I thank the Clintons. But I still don't like/trust them.

I like them because the enrage the right. I will vote for the Dem. candidate. Period.

Jeez, lighten up, folks.

You can make fun of my candidate all you like: Kucinich 2008; oh, wait. Edwards 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Clinton lied under oath" Thank God you're not a lawyer
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 07:41 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
And if you are, God help us.

Perjury is a crime with no everyday analogue.

Clinton willfully deceived the American people, and was less than forthcoming in his sworn deposition in the Paula Jones case, but he didn't commit perjury.

The term "sexual relations" had a stipulated meaning established by the judge in the Paula Jones case in the ground rules for the deposition. He was asked a question and answered it narrowly, literally and accurately using the definitions established for the deposition. The fact that the questioner didn't follow up properly speaks to the general incompetence of the stooges pursuing the Paula Jones case.

If you cannot distinguish "being weaselly while under oath" and "perjury" then you ought to refrain from stating that people committed perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Jesus, you miss the whole fucking point.
God, I hope you don't operate heavy or light machinery.

The point was simply to get them to do (and the cable shows to do) what you just did. It ain't rocket science, brainiac. So get them, their handlers, cable spokespeople to talk about how it wasn't technically lying under oath, about how ,technically, according to Black's it wasn't "sexual relations."

So, yeah, if I'm Obama, and I know how much the press doesn't like Hillary (and they don't), I give them the story to salivate over. In fact, I think the press would defend Obama. I think they'd say that Bill had it coming (no pun intended) because he's been making shit up (cue Kerry's statement).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. You're right. I stopped reading your post at that point, so didn't see where you were going
I'm in a foul mood.

Having read it all... That course of action would end Obama's political career on the spot.

Whatever Democrats think about Bill's impeachment, almost all Dems have an emotional investment in the impeachment saga.

I'd equate it to, if Gore entered the race, Obama mocking Gore for losing Florida.

Bringing up whitewater against Hillary would be similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Would it then be fair to ask Obama
if he's ever lied about sex? Under oath?

The Clinton campaign might not be able to ask that question, but everyone else can.

Don't open that can of worms. Obama's got enough problems already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edgeoforever Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. No. Obama is a democrat. You - not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. And you know this because
you read all of the posts on this thread. And all of my other posts on the board.

You are a sharp one.

Like a razor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. His supporters already are!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC