Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bad news for both Obama and Clinton. No Senator elected since 1960.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:16 AM
Original message
Bad news for both Obama and Clinton. No Senator elected since 1960.
Even then, 1960 was the exception that proved the rule. It was the only year that a D. won without Ohio since Ohio entered the Union. The Rs have never won without Ohio. The previous Senator to become president was Harding in 1920.

America prefers sitting presidents and governors. If Romney or Huckabee is nominated, then we will be trying to buck a historical trend.

This is not an implicit endorsement of Edwards. I'm simply pointing out a historic trend to anyone who is interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. How would it be an endorsementr of Edwards? He's a former Sen and never been Gov.
It seems pretty likely we could end up bucking the trend this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. He's not one now.
In 1988 we said no V.P. had been elected since van Buren. We didn't count Nixon because he was out of office in 1968.

Of course that observation ended up not meaning shit in 1988.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Has a former Sen been elected since 1968?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. No, only governors and one VP who lasted one term
1972 - Nixon (re elected)
1976 - Carter
1980 - Reagan
1988 - papa Bush
1992 - Clinton
2000 - Bush Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. So what happens if it's SEN. Obama/Clinton against SEN. McCain?
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 01:23 AM by Drunken Irishman
Does the universe collapse upon itself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes, polling stations will form micro-quasars...
...and kill us all with intense radiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. just what I was going to say
:thumbsup: What stupid logic people use sometimes (or don't use)??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think Senators tend to win open elections. Governors tend to beat incumbents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Which is why a Hillary/Obama or Obama/Hillary ticket is crazy
Whoever is the nominee, of all three, will need a military experience as a running mate. Wes Clark for Hillary and I read someplace on DU Webb for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. If either win the nod, then the VP will be a white man.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 01:26 AM by Deep13
That's still the largest voting block. I figured HC would pick Clark. Is Webb the same guy who is Senator from VA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Yes. A veteran (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. Wrong. The largest voting block is women. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Edwards is a senator too, so what am I missing?
What happens if they run against McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. He was a Senator. Now a private citizen. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. When was the last time a private citizen was elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midwestern Democrat Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Reagan in 1980 - he'd been out of the CA Governor's office since 1975.
Carter was also a private citizen when he was elected in 1976, having left the GA Governorship in 1975, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. 1968
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. More bad news.
No woman or African American has ever been elected. What to do? what to do? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Damn. We're screwn.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Okay Elizabeth, you can pick out the carpet and draperies now. We're going to the White House.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 02:12 AM by avaistheone1
LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well, they've never elected a black or female candidate to the presidency yet either.
It's paradigm-breaking time.

Edwards WAS a Senator...like "taking a break" would help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. It worked for Nixon -
though I HATE using that as an example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Well, he was a former VP when he ran for the Presidency... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. True, but similarly he didn't go directly from the one to the other.
He has several years of lying fallow before 68. Not the same as a sitting VP stepping up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kerry won in 2004..
He wasn't allowed to serve since the fascists fixed the votes in the middle of the night, but he did win the election.:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
21. since it's going to be McCain vs. Hill or Obama, 2008 will be the year a senator gets elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
23. That's why Durbin told Obama to run now
He said a more years in the Senate and a thousands more votes do NOT make it better timing. Do it now.

The reason seems obvious since televised debates at least.
Everyone can be picked on for votes as you have seen ours all picked on for votes.
Some deserve to be picked on. (The only Senator up for reelection that voted against the authorization to use force on Iraq was Wellstone. For the same reason it's no surprise future candidates did the same)

Some just sound bad but had good reasons...a part of a good bill can be unacceptable or a not great bill can have something very important in it so they have to weigh it.

But it still sounds bad when they have seconds to justify an accusation.

Of course Obama sounds bad with the 130 present votes in the State Senate. He didn't explain it well as the general concept, he tried explaining the reason for the particular one Clinton brought up.
He should have explained (honestly) that Present" is used commonly as a strategic or protest vote. Usually groups make the vote together, either all in one party or some in both. As a Constitutional law geek he sometimes voiced his objection to it and did it alone or with few others.
There they didn't vote No to a bill they agreed with in essence and so on.

So that's even worse sounding then explaining the "bad" Senate votes that are not bad. (Bet he practices that answer!)

Governors don't vote and have a congress to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. True, but in several of these elections no senator was running
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 06:38 AM by LeftishBrit
After checking the list, I think the only ones that involved a senator were:

1964: Goldwater vs Johnson

1972: McGovern vs Nixon

1996: Dole vs Clinton

2004: Kerry vs Bush


In all these cases, the senator was challenging an incumbent, which may have made life more difficult, and there were other reasons why they may have lost. And probably no one will ever really know who won in 2004 anyway.

ETA: even if it's Edwards, he is not a senator now, but that was his main experience as an elected official. A governor might have some advantage in that (s)he had already run a government; but there is no governor likely to run, at least on the Dem side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC