Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Dennis quit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:37 AM
Original message
Why Dennis quit
Dennis quit for a simple reason. There is some absurd speculation going on as to why he quit. Here's the bottom line: Dennis is in a tough race to be the dem candidate in his Congressional district, and he quit to focus on the race. He's been open about this. And god knows, it would be awful if he didn't win. We need him like crazy in the House- and we've never needed him more:

Kucinich Abandons White House Bid
By THOMAS J. SHEERAN – 19 hours ago

CLEVELAND (AP) — Democrat Dennis Kucinich abandoned his presidential bid Friday to focus on a tough race for re-election to Congress.

Kucinich, speaking at a union hall, told supporters who chanted "Dennis, Dennis," that he would work to keep his campaign promises, not as president, but as a member of the U.S. House.

"I won't be president, but I can continue to fight for these important issues as the United States congressman representing the community that is first in my heart, Cleveland, Ohio," he said.

Kucinich made an urgent appeal on his Web site this week for congressional campaign contributions as "the only candidate who can't be bought — 'cause he's not for sale."

<snip>

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hvqZApX0MAbUfw6405YqTDVR-9MAD8UD1OJG0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, I think I will donate to his reelection campaign, we need him
in congress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm going to do the same thing!
I can't imagine him losing this race. It would really suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseycoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks cali
We definitely can't afford to lose him in the House!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. if i had a dime i would
the people in his district should come over to mine...hastret resigned and the guy who is replacing him is a complete right wing psycho that makes denny h look like a statesman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. yikes. that's alarming.
Is there a viable dem running? Is it possible to win that district? As I recall, it's a pretty red district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eagle_Eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Honorable Dennis Kucinich, congressman from Ohio, quit because of money
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 07:46 AM by Eagle_Eye
It is a sad fact that the quality of the candidate has an insignificant role in elections compared to the quantity of money raised.

Hillary has a superb edge in fund raising followed by Obama.

We are going to see Hillary as the next president, Obama as VP and Edwards in the cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. He quit because he realized that he didn't have a chance
to become the nominee, and is in a tough fight for the nomination in his congressional race. It's right in the article I posted, and Dennis said the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. So we'll end up with the best government corporations can buy.
No thanks, I'm voting for John Edwards..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eagle_Eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. You have got that right, money talks
Little guys like me cannot compete with groups that can fund their ideas with millions of $$$.

The best I can do is to keep myself informed and never, ever vote republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. absurd speculation
I'll say :crazy:

(I can't even believe something I just read in another thread.)

GO DENNIS!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. He wasn't getting any votes
Why give up your House seat to be Don Quixote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dennis Kucinich exposed the true power structure
in the US.
Many people (including me) underestimated what it would take to undo the damage that was done to the US from the inside. Unfortunately in order for anyone to stand against pure corruption with unlimited money sources, media coverage and secrecy, he or she would need a network of powerful altruistic friends in a lot of key places, plus the active participation of the constituency. At this time progressives are only building strength, awareness and numbers, and the ground gained in the Fall of 2008 will be just the start.
I hoped that the 'silent majority' would rise up and back Dennis Kucinich in sheer numbers and honest money. I had to be reminded again of how far behind the physical world is to the world of ideas. There is a gap.
Dennis Kucinich asked America to wake up and smell the coffee, and I am afraid most people just hit the snooze alarm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elaineb Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Brilliant post
Sums it up perfectly. Although I'll take a small bit of issue with the last sentence--because of Kucinich's lack of huge donations at the start of the race, (as the frontrunners received), his message never really got out in the first place, except to the small number of Americans who were watching the early debates. He certainly wasn't covered in the mainstream media outside the debates. Rather than saying that America as a whole hit the snooze alarm, I'd say that the majority of Americans have been asleep for many years, and that Kucinich never was allowed the chance (that the big-money candidates were given) to wake them up.

What disturbs me is the number of politically-aware Democrats, who ought to have been receptive to his message, knowing perfectly well what he stands for, who chose to "hit the snooze alarm". It's incredible that any Democrat on this board who's been complaining for years about the abuses done to our Constitution, government, and society by the Bush administration should say one negative thing against Kucinich. Fine, choose someone else as your candidate if you want to defer to someone else's judgment as to what makes an "electable" candidate or if you believe Kucinich is too idealistic and uncompromising, but I will never forgive the posters here who have taken continuous swipes at someone who is standing up for the best of our ideals and for the Democratic tradition without apologies. As far as that goes, I have more faith in the American people as a whole being receptive to Kucinich's positions (if a majority of Americans actually knew what they were) than I do in the small but dedicated group of Kucinich-bashers on this forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. I just thought he wanted to get a head start on his 2012 presidential campaign.
However, coming here if Kucinich were to lose the primary would be greatly amusing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Kucinich's main rival in Cleveland
raised like 200K in two months. The speed with which Cimperman raised that kind of dough says, he's a shill. Could he have gotten that kind of cash from Karl Rove. Campaign cash can be laundered in an attempt to disconnect it from it's real donors. / Congressional campaigns can be like presidential races. Special interest money can buy a congressional seat also. And a district's constituents can be suckered in by outside influences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Maybe voters are fed up with having a part-time congressman.
While having him spend the rest of his time on a doomed presidential campaign that was over before it started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. check congresspedia
part of his problem in running for president. His Congressional duties came first. He has a better voting attendence record than compared to the majority who are not running for president. His absentee rate was like less than 20percent absentee rate. Hillary's is like 35Percent. I know I need confirm such. But that is darn close last check. Besides, when he runs for president he very well represents the interests of Cleveland at the national level. He has nothing to feel quilty for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. wrong . considerably under 20%.
Missed Votes
Dennis Kucinich has missed 139 votes (11.5%) during the current Congress. See a list of his missed votes since 1991 or see a full list of vote missers.

Voting with Party

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/k000336/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Once the media black out hits, it's hard to get any traction.
Dennis fought the good fight.

I salute him!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC