Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon: The racial divide, then and now (SC primary results related)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:25 AM
Original message
Salon: The racial divide, then and now (SC primary results related)


The racial divide, then and now

As Democrats in South Carolina go to the polls today, the mainstream media will be reminding us incessantly that Palmetto state voters are divided among racial lines.

The Washington Post, explaining that the "recent focus on has stirred considerable angst" in Barack Obama's "inner circle," notes that an MSNBC-McClatchy Newspaper poll out this week showed a wide racial divide among South Carolina Democrats. Among African-American voters, the poll had Obama at 59 percent, followed by Hillary Clinton at 25 percent and John Edwards at 4 percent. Among white voters, Edwards led with 40 percent, followed by Clinton at 36 percent and Obama at 10 percent.

The New York Times says Obama's strategists "worry" that all the discussion about race has "driven whites away from his candidacy." "If the trend materializes in the voting," the Times says, "his ability to transcend race could come into question and pose complications in the more than 20 states that vote on Feb. 5."

While it's true that a racial divide could spell trouble for Obama in states where African-Americans represent a smaller percentage of the electorate, there's one semi-relevant point of comparison we probably won't be hearing much today: Exit polls from the 2004 presidential race showed that George W. Bush got just 11 percent of the black vote nationwide -- 88 percent went to John Kerry -- and we don't remember too many next-day headlines marginalizing his victory on the grounds of racial polarization.

― Tim Grieve

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?source=whitelist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Grieve is prescient. That's exactly what's happening. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. SC was always going to have a racial favouritism to it, no-one imagined him this far at one point.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 11:19 AM by cooolandrew
The main factor is Barack has not run a campaign on race as long as folks recognise this he's as good a chance as any of the other 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Forgive my ignorance, but did Bill Clinton stand up to the GOP who disenfranchised voters
in 2000, 2002 or 2004? Did his endorsement of NAFTA bring jobs to their middle class?

As a white person I have found this racial divide BROUGHT ON BY THE CLINTONS AND THEIR HENCHMEN/WOMEN to be DESPICABLE! I would NEVER support an candidate that uses this type of rovian division.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep. But we're supposed to believe that since, um, YESTERDAY
HRC is a champion of American voters. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC