Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo discovers JOHN EDWARDS! (Great article!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:15 PM
Original message
WaPo discovers JOHN EDWARDS! (Great article!)
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 12:29 PM by chimpymustgo
Taking a break from phone calling for Edwards, I opened up my newspaper (WaPo) - and lo and behold...on the front page of the Style section - a HUGE story about John Edwards - and his fight to be heard. So on the day of voting, in this critical primary, John Edwards is everywhere. I think all the media outlets are just trying to make their numbers look better (now everyone can say, we just did a great profile/live interview, etc) of John Edwards!

Oh well. We just have to keep shouting over the noise.

*********


Shouting Distance
John Edwards Tries to Catch The Ear of S.C.


"This is about being heard," Edwards declares. "If I get heard, I'll be the nominee. If I get heard, I'll be the president." (By Preston Keres -- The Washington Post)

By Kevin Merida
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 26, 2008; Page C01
LAURENS, S.C.

<snip>

"Well, I'm running against two candidates who've raised over $100 million each and have a lot of glitz associated with their campaigns," he says. "And I think the guy who's in the trenches just working, and that's me in this case, sometimes has trouble getting heard in that environment. And my job is to stay at it, just relentlessly stay at it, which is what I'm doing."

Edwards readily admits that he is an underdog here, battling some centrifugal force that he only partly understands. He is confronting all kinds of questions about his campaign, questions he knows will reach into his immediate future if he doesn't win Saturday or at least surprise people with an unexpectedly strong showing. Oh, the questions: What's wrong with John? Why can't he break through? How long will he stay in the race? Could it be that this is just a bad year to be a white male running for president in the Democratic Party?

"If you're me and you grew up in the South, as I did, in the '50s and '60s, I actually think the fact that we have an African American and a woman who are strong candidates for the presidency is an indication of a lot of progress in this country," he says. "So, it's hard for me to not be happy and proud about that."

And yet, he is still stuck in third place with all that pride and happiness. Does he believe a lack of media coverage is one of the reasons he has not been more successful?

"I'm 54 years old," he begins, measuring his words, "and I've been fighting uphill a big part of my life. . . . I'm just not in the business of making excuses. That's not what I do. Is it hard to get heard? Yes. Does the media play a significant role in directing people in a particular direction in this case? Absolutely. If you look at sort of where the vote is, it's almost directly proportional to the amount of media coverage."

An ongoing study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism placed Edwards a distant sixth among Democratic and Republican candidates in volume of campaign coverage last week; the former senator from North Carolina was a main newsmaker or significant presence in just 6 percent of campaign stories. Obama and Clinton? Almost five times the amount of coverage.

This is a source of unending frustration for the Edwards team. "It's been very difficult," says campaign manager David E. Bonior, the former longtime House Democratic whip. "We've been really trying to make news, working our hearts out on it."

This week, Edwards engaged in a hair-mussing fight with David Letterman -- "a hoot," the candidate exclaimed -- and appeared on the sultry Tyra Banks's show. The campaign also released a letter from Martin Luther King III, who met with Edwards in the midst of the food fight between Clinton and Obama surrogates over the proper treatment of his father's legacy. MLK III praised Edwards for having "almost single-handedly made poverty an issue in this election" and challenged the other candidates to "follow your lead, and speak up loudly and forcefully on the issue of economic justice in America."

The letter got scant notice. The coverage blackout has become such a running theme among Edwards operatives that the campaign decided to spoof itself, putting up a video on its Web site, titled: "Where Is John?" The video, set to the banjo-dueling-guitar music of the movie "Deliverance," shows newspaper headlines and TV news footage in which only Obama and Clinton are mentioned. It concludes with a Fox News clip in which pollster Frank Luntz asked a focus group that watched the recent Nevada debate: "How many of you thought John Edwards won?" Most hands went up.


CONTINUED 1 2 3 4 Next >



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/25/AR2008012503273.html

edited to add to the title that it's a good article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kitty44 Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did you notice that the sentence about his hair got one paragraph?
This was not a fair piece and I left a comment to the WaPo to tell them so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Let's please write the Washington Post now and ask them to apologize, or do a piece on the hair....
of all the Republican and Democratic candidates, as well as the CEO and the Board of the Washington Post, where they do their hair, what they wash it with, and how much money they spend on it. I'll bet the CEO of the Wash Post, has it washed with gold leaf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Wah, wah, wah DU newbie
the irrational Obama cultists are showing their infantile political pedigree again.

Pathetic!!! :silly: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitty44 Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Edwards gets the Style section and Obama and Clinton get front page coverage
Not only that - Obama and Clinton have made the front page repeatedly.

Shortly after placing second in Iowa, the Project for Excellence in Journalism found that John Edwards received a puny seven percent of national media coverage. Clinton and Obama got between four and five times more; their poll numbers were nowhere close to that much higher than Edwards'.

Please tell me how this is fair.

This is about equal coverage for ALL candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Um, I believe kitty has been here longer than you.
Not that it is relevent to the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. That was one WORD about hair-mussing on Letterman's show. Moved right to MLK's letter to JRE.
I thought the article was strong. And told more about the campaign's strategy, as well as the actual people of SC where he's been campaigning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. "This is about being heard," Edwards declares.
The media has made sure that Edwards and the other candidates not Hillary or O, aren't being heard.

It's a testament to Edwards and his supporters that he's still viable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. I just edited the title to say it's a great article. Lots of good info and interviews with people.
It's had times down there - and many places across the country. How many stories have you seen about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now that Kucinich has dropped out, John is my candidate
GO EDWARDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I've been wondering where his voters would go
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Where else is there to go?
The other candidates have been moving steadily to the right. If I hear one more time about how they LOVE Ronald Reagan....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great article
:kick: & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. finally
:hi: Maybe the media is realizing the other two are soon to implode and they will have to give attention to the next democratic candidate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, it's a great article
Thanks for posting it! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Nice read.....
K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Off to the Greatest ye shall go.... ;=D
WOW, the media realizes there is another Democratic Candidate.

I'm glad they finally got the memo. Now if only they would continue to give him coverage.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Most of the people who came to the rally probably walked"
'Nuf said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. WaPo's John Solomon did a series about Edwards' hair,hairdresser, house, $$$ one year ago
when Edwards was a top tier candidate in order to create the big lie "Edwards is a phony". Then, they sat back and joined the rest of the MSM in ignoring him for a solid year, while playing up Hillary and Obama as the "Two Man Race." And now, for three days they are going to give him coverage so that he can split the South Carolina "White vote" with Hillary. After the So. Carolina race is over, no matter how well Edwards' does, the MSM will say it was only because he was a favorite son and they will ignore him again as they ignored him after Iowa. If anyone does raise his name, some surly MSM pundit will say "Edwards is through. Do not waste your campaign dollars on him."

Too little, too late WaPo. You suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC