Since pretty much any statement of any kind is racially charged:

[Zynx]

Here's something shiny for the kids to play with:


Or perhaps a pet:




I think this thread was as non-offensive as I could get. :-)

[maddiejoan]

1. I notice the third picture

is of an "African" Grey Parrot.

just sayin'

[Zynx]

Oh geez.

I forgot about that.

[NoBorders]

2. So, you hate cats eh?

Don't see any pictures of cats. Jerk. :-)

[Zynx]

5. I added a kitty now.

:-)

[NoBorders]

14. OK, thanks.

I approve. :-)

[no name no slogan]

3. Nice post, sugar tits

[goldcanyonaz]

4. No candy?

*sobs*

[mondo joe]

6. Father and son consider the race card (photo):

?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19390335F8FA9CA92A64762FD42DEA5991D474FC6B9CADF7309

[KennedyGuy]

7. That hamster thing is obviously an attack on gays..

what with code and all...

[Zynx]

9. Hmmm...Didn't think about that.

[KennedyGuy]

13. I'm trying to work out some outrage..

but I've been busy beating sniffa away...

[TZ]

8. Shiny and fluffy?

You realize you are insulting the wood and spike crowd here don't you?:)


cute kitteh though...:thumbsup:

[Zynx]

10. Is this better?

[patrice]

11. This is true. It's our language. Anything can be made into anything else with words.

Our language is a hypothetical system of hypotheses. Anything can be taken and "turned" and described from a perspective different from that which was intended by the speaker/writer. Our language simply wouldn't work if this weren't true. Language requires "fuzzy logic". What we need is people to become more experiencially and concretely acquainted with whatever it is that a given statement refers to, so that their own logic is as "un-fuzzy" as possible.

Suggestion: wiki "deconstruction".

[Armstead]

12. You forgot Pink Fluffy Bunnies

Ooops...I guess the word pink could be construed in both sexist and racist terms.

Fluffy bunnies?