Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teddy or the Big Dog?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:10 PM
Original message
Poll question: Teddy or the Big Dog?
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 09:11 PM by jefferson_dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Senator Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. OBAMA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's the question? Who do we prefer?
I like both but I'll go with the man that became president for 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Who do you prefer? Who speaks for you? Who is "the shizzle"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
59. As opposed to the one who tried to challenge a sitting president
and probably contributed to Obama's hero - Reagan - winning.

Not that I have high opinions of Carter but, really, when one is thinking of the "good of the party" Teddy certainly changed his tune from 28 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll take the twice elected president
over the senator who ruined his chances of becoming president by allowing a young woman to drown while driving drunk. I like Teddy and have defended him over the years, but for him to criticize Bill Clinton on his ethics is frankly laughable. Nothing that Clinton ever did came close to causing a woman's death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. So the Hillary folks are quick to bring up Chipadequik....
I guess the Republicans can take a rest...the hillary herd is doing their work for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. It's part of him.
I'll take Bill anytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. I'll be gentle and not mention the part of Bill I despise. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. What Bill did - did not cause death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I'm not going to rehash what happened. We all know about it.
It's ancient history and was not intentional. Other things were done intentionally and as you've proved, people have long memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #45
66. His actions after the accident were intentional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #44
69. That's fairly debatable, starting with sanctions in Iraq. n/t
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 09:32 AM by JTFrog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #34
67. It's apparently also part of the Hillary Herd to bash Democrats
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 07:27 AM by earthlover
The herd tramples everything that stands in the way, even good Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. What I'm criticizing is his HYPOCRISY
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 10:06 PM by Beacool
in questioning Bill's ethics while he and the rest of his family have enough skeletons in their closet to fill two cemeteries. I still remember when one of his nephews raped a girl in Palm Beach, plus many other unsavory incidents that I prefer to keep quiet. Their PB home was not too far from ours, and since we travel in some of the same circles and even attended the same church in PB, I know enough about Teddy, et al. to fill a book. We also saw plenty of their antics on display while summering in Hyannis.

Teddy, I love that you're one of the last remaining true liberals, but STFU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. 1st Diss of Teddy, 1st mention of Chappaquiddik
Everybody take a drink

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not sure what the question is. I prefer Bill Clinton. His own man, not dependent on family
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 09:31 PM by jlake
connections & he actually became president for 8 years.
That does not mean that I dislike Kennedy or feel the need to trash him.

ETA: Hillary and Bill are a married couple. Neither got to where they are by their families' deep political connections.
i.e. not born with silver spoons in their mouths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. "His own man, not dependent on family"
What a very curious statement for you to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Especially given the poster's avatar and signature pic.
The brutal irony is overwhelming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Precisely my point...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. You owe me a keyboard.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Ahhh, so spouses must stay out of it for it to be "fair" eh?
But rich bootlegger daddies--blood relatives-- who launch their kids' political careers, why, that's just FINE.

Talk about BRUTAL irony!!

Either that, or a sad misapprehension of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. The Kennedys and the Bushes, our two royal families!!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. ....
:eyes: I edited my post to clarify. Though I think you know what I meant all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. As is the Kennedy family representing change.
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. There is no irony. Hillary and Bill are a team - they built it together. The Kennedy's
are a dynasty and Teddy was given the keys to the kingdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Hillary, on the other hand, is dependent on family....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Her husband.... she wasn't put into politics by her polically and business connected
father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. He had no bootlegger daddy who married into a Boston political dynasty, became wealthy, and
used his wealth to curry influence, bang starlets, gain an ambassadorship and launch the political careers of his children.

Your seeming lack of knowledge about the history of the Kennedy family makes your statement rather "curious."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Too much to resist
Right Bill's daddy Drank all the bootleg whiskey, married for politically expedience, banged anything that didn't move fast enough and had his wife keep them quiet for their political well being as they launched their own political career with a scorched earth policy.

Your lack of knowledge about the history of the Clintons makes your statements rather "curious"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Clinton never KNEW his father. He was raised, poorly, by a stepfather.
And still, he overcame.

His parents were never in politics.

Real classy, that post of yours. I am going to cut and paste it, to preserve it from any "put down the tumbler of gin and edit" revisions.

In Spain they'd call you "sin verguenza." It suits you.


--------------------------
Too much to resist
Posted by GoldieAZ49
Right Bill's daddy Drank all the bootleg whiskey, married for politically expedience, banged anything that didn't move fast enough and had his wife keep them quiet for their political well being as they launched their own political career with a scorched earth policy.

Your lack of knowledge about the history of the Clintons makes your statements rather "curious"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Good Idea
MADem Response to Reply #9
17. He had no bootlegger daddy who married into a Boston political dynasty, became wealthy, and

used his wealth to curry influence, bang starlets, gain an ambassadorship and launch the political careers of his children.

Your seeming lack of knowledge about the history of the Kennedy family makes your statement rather "curious."


Too much to resist
Posted by GoldieAZ49
Right Bill's daddy Drank all the bootleg whiskey, married for politically expedience, banged anything that didn't move fast enough and had his wife keep them quiet for their political well being as they launched their own political career with a scorched earth policy.

Your lack of knowledge about the history of the Clintons makes your statements rather "curious"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. My post contained nothing but truthful remarks. Google Joseph P. Kennedy when you have some time.
Google Gloria Swanson, too.

Here, start with this VANITY FAIR piece, it's a simple enough read for you: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2002/04/joekennedy200204

Joseph P. Kennedy's brief Hollywood reign, from 1926 to 1930—during which he ran three studios, spearheaded the talkie revolution, and created the prototype for the modern entertainment empire—has gone largely unexamined, overshadowed by his founding of America's greatest political dynasty. As newly accessible archives disclose, the Boston financier devastated the careers of two major stars, one of them his mistress Gloria Swanson, in the merciless pursuit of movie-industry fortune. Kennedy became the first (and only) outsider to take Hollywood for a ride, while succumbing to its ultimate seduction. ....Then, after less than five years, Kennedy turned his back on it all, walking away with millions of dollars in his pocket. Hollywood has long been famous for taking outside investors to the cleaners, as Matsushita or Sony could tell you, but, as Betty Lasky, daughter of Paramount co-founder Jesse Lasky, says, "Kennedy was the first and only outsider to fleece Hollywood."

Yet with the exception of his affair with Swanson, the story behind Kennedy's tenure in Hollywood has been blurred and largely left unexamined; dozens of books on the history of Hollywood studios barely mention his name. There are several reasons for this lapse, among them the fact that by the time he died in 1969 Kennedy had accumulated a dizzying list of occupations: stockbroker, bootlegger, the first chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Franklin Roosevelt's ambassador to Great Britain, real-estate magnate, and father of a president. Moreover, much of what has been previously written about him has been based on secondary sources, contemporary articles he himself was allowed to edit, and stories he planted. These have been repeated over and over through the years. His complex maze of deals has been further obscured because what paper trail he did leave has been locked away for decades. ....


Here's more, from BIOGRAPHY: http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9542623

Rose Kennedy was the eldest child of John "Honey Fitz" Fitzgerald, a prominent figure in Boston politics who served one term as a congressional representative and later became the city's mayor. Kennedy grew up in the political spotlight, accompanying her father to various partisan functions while she was still a teenager. After graduating from high school at the age of 16, she wanted to attend the prestigious Wellesley College but was sent by her parents to Boston's Convent of the Sacred Heart. She later studied French and German at a convent school in the Netherlands. Upon her return to the States, Rose fell for a saloonkeeper's son named Joseph P. Kennedy. Although her father respected the young man's ambition -- Joe Kennedy became the youngest bank president in U.S. history -- he never liked the young businessman and disapproved of the relationship.

Rose continued dating Kennedy against her father's wishes, and in 1914 the couple was married. They had nine children during their 55-year-long marriage. Joe Kennedy became a multi-millionaire financier. He attracted considerable attention with his sometimes questionable business dealings -- he is said to have dabbled in bootlegging -- and alleged philandering. Unruffled by public speculation, Rose immersed herself in the business of raising her family. She schooled her children in the history of the American Democratic tradition and went on to nurture the political ambitions of three sons -- John, Robert, and Edward -- vigorously promoting their careers through grass roots campaigning.



You aren't very knowledgeable on the history of the family, I see. You're rather smug in that lack of edification, too! It's somewhat amusing, if...pathetic.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. I know all the history of the Kennedys
and the Clintons...maybe you should get a bit more knowledgeable....there are several good unbiased books about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. No, you don't. Otherwise you wouldn't have responded as you did.
Your effort at backtracking is transparent AND pathetic. And unconvincing, too.

You also demonstrated, with that post I clipped, that you DON'T know the history of President Clinton's life. If you did, you wouldn't have said what you did.

That's a nice "nervy" post, there--attempting to brazenly pretend that you possess knowledge that you, by your VERY own words, prove that you lack!

Not too clever a tactic, but we will award you a consolation point for both sheer chutzpah and a good laugh.

Have a sandwich:



:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. I have updated my post to clarify. Thanks for the spin though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Well at least you didn't diss Teddy
implying he has not earned his senate seat but had it given to him by his family

oh wait, you did....everybody take another drink!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I stated why I prefer Bill. Not that I didn't like Ted.
And why shouldn't I... it takes more to make something of yourself rather than ride your parent's coattails.... but it does not diminish the successes of the privileged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. but riding your husbands coattails to become POTUS is ok?!?!? Huh, got it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Don't be sexist. Hillary and Bill have worked together for years.
She has plenty of her own achievements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. 35 yrs to be exact
and they have already had 2 terms in the White House
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. So is she just riding his coattails, or has she already served as president.
... hard to keep up with your train of thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. BOTH
is that easier for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. I guess it takes cognitive dissonance to support Obama.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 11:10 PM by jlake
How can she be both riding his coattails and co-president, and how can the Kennedy's, the ultimate party insiders, represent change?

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Good Grief
Teddy doesn't represent change. Who said he did?

as for the coattails and the co-presidency...it was the two for one presidency (according to Bill) and without him she wouldn't, couldn't be running now on her own
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. If the establishment is embracing Obama, how can he represent change.
....and being part of a working team is not the same as being born into something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lee L. Mercer Jr.
all three
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. If we played "which one of these is not like the other...?"
That would be fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Indeed. Lee L. Mercer Jr. is a statesman and a scholar
I have no idea who those other guys are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bill Clinton no question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. this is becoming boarderline insane!
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. The liberal lion. His endorsement makes me feel a lot better about Obama
Obama can't be that bad (relatively speaking!) if Kennedy supports him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Hey there!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. Edwards to the convention and the presidency.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 09:30 PM by JDPriestly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
27. Teddy is the only progressive choice
He fought against every lousy decision Bill made, including the IWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. Gotta Go With The Big Dog Here.
I love Ted and all, but the Big Dog rocks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. Big Dog did more for me than Ted will ever do - NLCB - I suffer daily for it.
Or rather my kid does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
46. the Big Dog is far more representative of the mainstream of the
Democratic Party than Ted Kennedy is. In many parts of the country Kennedy is actively disliked as the epitome of northeastern liberalism.

I don't see how his endorsement helps Obama outside of New England.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
47. Both. N/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawmut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
48. The liberal one
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
52. Bwhahaha! Again Hillary is ignored! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
53. Bill is the Man!
And any way because of Ted running against Jimmy Carter in 1980, that helped weaken Carters run for re-election that year when so many Democrats in the party told Ted to stay out of the election. Yes Senator Kennedy has done a lot for the people of the U.S., but that year 1980 he really hurt The Democratic Party. So there is no need to mention or talk about Chappaquiddick, when Ted help screw Carters re-election in 1980.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #53
72. Even without the Kennedy run, Carter was in major trouble
His poll numbers were lower than Bush I's in 1992 and they didn't look like they could recover. I don't think that Kennedy would have won had he got the nomination, but he would have had more chance than Carter. I know many liberals who voted for Anderson because they were fed up with Carter - that still would have happened if Kennedy would never have challenged him. (Look at 1968 - had RFK not been assassinated, he likely would have won in very inspirational campaign. With RFK the likely victor, I doubt the Chicago riots would have occurred. (Or had they come and tensions rose it Grant Park, I can imagine RFK coming and speaking as he did in Indianapolis in the wake of the MLK killing - calming the anger and channeling it productively. His run would not have happened if McCarthy had not challenged a sitting President.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. Kennedy still hurt Carter.
People can spend all they want. The Democratic Party knew Carter was in trouble because of the economy. Some in the Party tried to stop Ted and he would not have anything to do with it. He wanted to be like his brothers and he was still trying to clean his name of Chappaquiddick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
77. Wow! So, you got both Chappaquiddick and Carter in on one post.
That's a new low for DU!

Do recall, buddy, that the Ford/Reagan bloodbath is what got Carter elected in the first place. Reagan was simply cashing in on his rightful succession. Kennedy pointing out Carter's flaws was not nearly the cheap crap being spewed this campaign.

Keep trying, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. Just keep on trying to spin your spin.
Ted Kennedy didn't help Carter. Also Kennedy didn't just point out some flaws about Carter. That campaign of Kennedy against Carter was a "Bloodbath". Ted went after Carter like a pit bull. So keep on trying to spin your spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
54. Teddy doubles up the Big Dog...
Poor fella...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
56. Ladies and Gentlemen, Bill Clinton's *ELVIS* has left the building ... FOREVER! eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Cheers
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
62. Go Teddy! Gobama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
65. Its the wrong fight Billary,
its the wrong,its the wrong,its the wrong,its the wrong,its the wrong,its the wrong,

its the wrong,its the wrong,its the wrong,its the wrong,its the wrong,its the wrong,

no contest Ted wins hands down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semass Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
68. Voted Teddy here, Clinton on Feb. 5. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
70. Democrats chose Jimmy Carter over Ted. He lost influence long ago.
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 09:42 AM by WinkyDink
Moreover, he is not a "unifying" figure within the general population.

I LOVE TEDDY, from way back in his young-and-gorgeous days! But his time has passed, and Obama will not carry on his legacy.

It takes more than charisma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
71. Bill's most memorable line was
"The era of big government is over."

Ted's:

"The cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."

Advantage: Ted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
74. Teddy is a true liberal and has fought the good fight for decades. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
75. I think this is political positioning by Ted
It's a good way to affirm Democratic support for
the new and young voters who are inspired by Obama...
keep them in the race as well as African Americans
if and when Hillary has more delegates...state
and super. It makes sense to me if I look at his support
that way. He is the symbolic and somewhat left leaning
patriarch of the Dem party.
What people ought to be asking is why he isn't supporting
Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
76. I'm gonna have to go w/ Teddy for the longevity factor.
No one has worked longer or harder for education, raising the minimum wage, civil liberties, and civil rights than Teddy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC