|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:32 PM Original message |
Why doesn't Obama drop out so his supporters can back Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. You're cute. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
32. He should after HRC drops out and throws her support to Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm sorry there are soo many people suggesting that Edwards should drop out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
23. LOL...I've been under the assumption you were being a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Even If i didnt have something to gain, I think its rude the way people say Edwards should drop out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tulkas (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. why didn't American Motors buy Chrysler instead of the other way around? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
4. What a great idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoBorders (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. Shut yer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
50. Then vote for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
6. I agree. If he did, then we wouldn't be stuck with the Clintons! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. Hey Lame going for 3 "deleted by moderator" tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. are you following me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. it's a fair question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. Why doesn't Edwards win a state first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. The unity of the "anti-Hillary" vote is precious, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. Why did Obama run? If he didn't there would be only one strong candidate against Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. Bwah! *snicker* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
14. Obama is a viable candidate with a path to the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Very true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 12:59 AM Response to Reply #21 |
45. Don't forget your condom. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Is Obama a viable candidate against the rethugs? He should move over for someone who can win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Edwards needs to win a few states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Michael Dukakis won a lot of primaries. How'd he do in the general? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:58 PM Original message |
About the same as Edwards will do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
15. Welllll....because Obama's winning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. and again you would be wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I'd be wrong then? You're asking for Obama to drop out when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I'll let someone who gets it come to my defense on this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Oh, well, if you didn't mean it, it sounds like you already knew the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. It isn't up to Obama or Edwards to decide who we vote for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Gee, so I can't just grab the ballots myself and start crossing Edwards' name off? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. No, and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Sorry, the correct answer is "No and yes" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. No, because we need the progressive ideas Edwards has to stay in the campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. Um....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. um no it's not, there are threads a plenty advocating JE drops out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
17. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. I'm for Edwards. I wish all other candidates, including GOPers, would drop out. ;-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
25. Got some popcorn ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
31. He's won a state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. a simple "I get your point" would have sufficed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
39. Hell Yeah! LOL. Really why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
40. Great idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
41. Makes sense to me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JosephSchmo (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
42. Obama has a chance at winning. Edwards does not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
43. Note to newbies: if there is popcorn in the OP, it's probably satire, sarcasm or a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyRiffraff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 12:57 AM Response to Original message |
44. I am laughing my ass off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
46. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
47. There is a difference: Obama actually wins and gets turnout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyRiffraff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:51 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Hmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalHeart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
48. Don't be silly. Obama should stay in -- and name Rezko his running mate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Rimshot!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
52. Ok, on Monday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC