Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Bill deserve to be the first First Gentleman?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:10 AM
Original message
Does Bill deserve to be the first First Gentleman?
If you think yes, could you explain?

We already know why not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course he does...she owes all her success to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Most, but not all.
I don't want to belittle Hillary unfairly. She did win 2 Senate elections.

Of course, I do think she never would have made it to the Senate OR victories in NH and NV if it hadn't been for Bill, and you can quote me on that. She's powerful as she is for really no other reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. At this point tonight, I dont care If i belittle her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You get my last PM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yea, thanks.
People here can be pretty shitty sometimes...and some people can be pretty shitty all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Check out my latest brainstorm--this might make you happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Of course you'd lobby for an under 30 forum...
Now that I'm 30!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Wow. It's shocking to see you lose you composure!
At one time, you were the person setting an example.

And now? It looks like a meltdown.

What happened hnmnf? Your candidate won yesterday.

Aren't you supposed to be happy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Not when many DUers sought out to tell us younger Obama supporters that we are ignorant
that we lack critical thinking skills, and that all we see in Obama is a fad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Me like hope. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
29.  ignorant...hence your post!
I mean really...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Would anyone want to be VP with him around? That is a pertinent question imo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think so...
vpotus trumps fgotus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. the position of First Spouse isn't awarded on merit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Lucky for Bill. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ask a stupid question
get an honest answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hillary deserves to be president IMO--she'll be a great one! (eom)
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. Isn't the candidate's spouse always awarded that
title?

I had no idea there's an application process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. Certainly.
Because he'd be the "co-President" as Hillary was with him. In all other cases the spouse of the President is completely irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. So as "co-president"...
Would she run everything by Bill first? Could he stand in for her if she needed to call in sick or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yes and No.
Not officially anyway to the second question. As to the first, yes. I do believe she would confer with Bill on most of the important issues as it is said he did with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
20. I think you must mean Co-President
I really do not want the Clinton's back in office. No more Bush/Clinton. I have had it with ruling family stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. Point of clarification - "Miss Manners: What to call president's husband?"
The president’s spouse is a private citizen with no official rank, and thus is properly addressed, in writing and in person, as Mrs. Washington (with neither her nor her husband’s given name; she would be THE Mrs. Washington, with no danger of being mistaken for Mrs. Chuck Washington).

However, courtesy accords precedence to her, or to another lady serving as the president’s hostess. This was referred to, in the era of more complicated and more rigorously observed precedence systems, as her being “the first lady of the land.”

....

A female president would be the hostess at state occasions; she cannot designate another lady to preside and therefore outrank her socially. What she would need, in addition to the professionals already provided for putting on such events, is an understanding public that does not keep asking for her recipes and notions about flower-arranging.

And now to the husband. If anything is sillier than “first lady,” it is “first husband” (unless this is necessary to distinguish him from a marital successor also on the scene). He would be the host, and addressed simply by his name and “Mr.” or another honorific he held, such as general or governor.


Emphasis mine.

http://www.buffalonews.com/opinion/columns/missmanners/story/246250.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. So we'll call him Mr. President and her Mrs. President?
FGOTUS will stick. Leno and Letterman will see to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. He's properly referred to as Governor or Mr. Clinton.
This response was in reference to a question about someone greeting Governor Carter.

"What Miss Manners can give you is the correct information. But it comes with a warning that most people not only don't know or believe it, but turn indignant with the notion that it is disrespectful.

This is because we suffer from title inflation. Our Founding Fathers, including the ones to whom this question applied, established American protocol to be simple and unpretentious - and thus antithetical to the modern taste.

Nevertheless, the rule is that titles pertaining to an office that only one person occupies at a time are not used after retirement. A former president can use a previously held, non-unique title, as the first one did by reverting to Gen. Washington in retirement, or the plain citizen's title of "Mr." The third president preferred to be known as Mr. Jefferson rather than Gov. Jefferson. Thus, the gentleman your son met would be addressed as Gov. Carter or Mr. Carter."


http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=189597
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. You are not fit to lick Bill Clinton's boots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Clinton's boots are not fit for licking. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. He's Had 35 Years of Experience Preparing Him For The Role
Clinton has already said that his wife was behind all the good ideas in his Presidency and behind all the bad ones. He knows that he belongs in the East Wing of the White House while Hillary is busy making all the big decisions over in the West Wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Are you serious? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC