|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:16 PM Original message |
Rezko Obama's Whitewater? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nobody froze to death in Whitewater. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Obama supporters refuse to acknowledge this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. This isn't an attack piece... please don't turn it in one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. This isn't going to go away, as I posted below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:59 PM Original message |
It's a column... An editorial... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Acknowledge what? That Rezko is scum? Yeah, we acknowledge that just fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. Just the opposite. Rezko is a real scandal that is not being investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. What surprises me is that it isn't all over the M$M. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. That's because it's a cotton-candy scandal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. That's because Obama is their cotton candy candidate. The PUKES are loving it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. Of course they are, because they know that if he wins the nom, the pukes are toast. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. But more importantly... Is it true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. That should tell you something. Even the bloodthirty, scandal-lovin' media doesn't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
43. That's because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Not if the lake is dry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Do we know that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Rezko is a real scandal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
31. Whitewater was a non-issue? Not a real scandal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Yes whitewater was a real scandal... but the clinton's involvement wasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. please don't be part of the echo chamber |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. that's my point here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. Obama was caution to come clean about the slumlord operation in his district |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. From what i understand he did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. As of January 24, 2008 he had not come clean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I seem to remember a debate when he did come clean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. That was the Chicago Sun Times, not hardly me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I'm still saying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. I think there might be a chance you do not know the full story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. I said so much in the original post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. Oh good grief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's no such thing. The Clintons' Whitewater scandal was a massive entanglement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I don't remember Whitewater. Was it investigated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Yes, and there was nothing to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Now you have proved without a doubt that you are a Republican operative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. chill out... he was just answering someone's question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. How old are you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Why does that matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. You lack context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Well, when you are ASKING a question... you are looking for context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. "I have assumed so all along and you have just hoisted by your own petard."? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
predfan (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. heh heh heh you said petard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
predfan (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. just as well get this out of the way now.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. He does seem to need some preparation for battle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
49. He's getting a lifetime's worth of prep-work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Not till the talking heads go to town on this, no. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tulkas (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. Obama made one mistake, associating with Rezko, Not like the Clintons at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Now now now... no bashing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
34. I certainly think it may be. Word has it that Obama may be mentioned in the court documents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
allinktup (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. i would assume so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC