Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rezko Obama's Whitewater?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:16 PM
Original message
Rezko Obama's Whitewater?
I'm not going to pretend to fully undestand either of them, but something about this just reminds me of the early 90's...

trumped up allegations that hold no..."watergate"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nobody froze to death in Whitewater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Obama supporters refuse to acknowledge this
It would have been so easy for Obama to come clean on this. But just exactly as he did the Texas two-step around "the party of ideas" he attempts to take the cowardly road around the slumlord issue inflicting abject poverty on children in his very own district.

This should be a nationl disgrace.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. This isn't an attack piece... please don't turn it in one
I haven't seen on shred of proof that this is true. Just like in Whitewater. Is this just politics? Shouldn't we expect better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. This isn't going to go away, as I posted below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:59 PM
Original message
It's a column... An editorial...
Tell me somethig... do you know everything your friends or acquaintances do?

There is nothing in that article that proves anything. It's just an opinion piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Acknowledge what? That Rezko is scum? Yeah, we acknowledge that just fine.
We deny that a politician is always responsible for scummy landlords in his district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just the opposite. Rezko is a real scandal that is not being investigated.
Whitewater was a non-issue that was scrutinized by the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. What surprises me is that it isn't all over the M$M.
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 01:21 PM by redqueen
I've seen a few articles leaked, but nothing coming out of the talking heads' mouths about this.

It's unsettling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's because it's a cotton-candy scandal.
All air, no substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. That's because Obama is their cotton candy candidate. The PUKES are loving it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Of course they are, because they know that if he wins the nom, the pukes are toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. But more importantly... Is it true?
Whitewater was all over everywhere, and it wasn't true. Is this the same thing?

I am not a clinton supporter, but I know right from wrong. And Whitewater was just disgusting.

I just see some similarities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. I don't know...
but it is alarming to see the media so quiet and incurious about a Democratic 'scandal'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. That should tell you something. Even the bloodthirty, scandal-lovin' media doesn't think
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 01:38 PM by Occam Bandage
there's anything here. This is a purely Chicago scandal, and it's been covered in the Chicago papers extensively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. That's because
The republicans don't want all the facts coming out "before" the nomination. If Obama wins, then the flood gates open, and all kinds of things will come out on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Not if the lake is dry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Do we know that?
from what i understand, it's the same thing. No proof of anything, and they're just hoping that the insinuations will convict him in the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Rezko is a real scandal
which has nothing to do with Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Whitewater was a non-issue? Not a real scandal?
Despite the fact that the Clintons were never charged with anything, Whitewater did result in Arkansas' sitting governor being removed from office and about a dozen other people were convicted of 40+ crimes (mostly fraud, conspiracy, embezzlement and bribery). Though the direction of the investigation may have focused toward getting the Clintons, as opposed to those who, in the end, were convicted, it was still a REAL scandal and should have been investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Yes whitewater was a real scandal... but the clinton's involvement wasn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. I agree...
It was a genuine scandal, whose investigation was also used to try to smear high profile politician. As far as I can tell, nowhere in the list of charges against Rezko is any allegation that Obama has done anything illegal. Will those in the press (or those prosecuting the case) attempt to use this to smear another high profile politician in a similar manner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. please don't be part of the echo chamber
something gets repeated enough, true or not, it plants a seed of doubt in the minds of the voters. It is a tried and true technique of the republicons. They don't need your help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. that's my point here
that is exactly what is happening. perhaps I should have made that more clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama was caution to come clean about the slumlord operation in his district
the part of this problem that Obama supporters refuse to face is the abject poverty inflicted on the children

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. From what i understand he did
and there wasn't much to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. As of January 24, 2008 he had not come clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I seem to remember a debate when he did come clean
...as clean as possible. when you're not dirty, there isn't much to clean off.

You're going to blame him for this whole thing when he spend 5 hours working on it?

That's like asking a gay guy if he knows anyone in san francisco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. That was the Chicago Sun Times, not hardly me.
And please don't think for even a second that should the RNC have to go against Obama, on this issue blood would not run. If these issues are not cleared they will haunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I'm still saying...
I haven't seen any proof of anything. And he DID come clean... there just wan't much dirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. I think there might be a chance you do not know the full story.
amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. I said so much in the original post
but from what i have heard, there doesn't seem to be anything there, and i haven't seen any comments on here that would tell me otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Oh good grief
That's like saying Don Perata the State Senator from Oakland, CA or Barbara Lee the Congresswoman representing Oakland in Congress can clean up every slumloard operation in his/her district.

Oakland has plenty of "slumlords" and I don't see anyone trashing Lee or Perata for not cleaning up every mess in their district. A State Senator has only so much power.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's no such thing. The Clintons' Whitewater scandal was a massive entanglement
Whitewater controversy

Beyond the Clinton team's hyping Obama's link to Rezko, his indictment is a problem focused on connections with Gov. Rod Blagojevich:

Earlier this month, Obama gave to charity more than $40,000 in past political contributions from seven individuals with ties to Rezko. The decision to donate the money contributed to Obama's House and Senate campaigns — but not his current presidential bid — came after a published report that Obama is the unnamed "political candidate" in one paragraph of a 78-page prosecution document that outlines the case against Rezko.

Obama also has had to answer questions about how Rezko became involved in the purchase of the Obama family home as well as other ties to Rezko that go back more than 15 years.

Obama has been accused of no wrongdoing involving Rezko or anyone else.

Rezko also has been one of Gov. Rod Blagojevich's leading fundraisers.

Rezko is charged in a 24-count indictment with pressuring businesses seeking work before two state regulatory boards to make campaign contributions and payoffs.

Once the estimated eight- to 12-week trial is over, Rezko still will face federal charges alleging he swindled General Electric Capital Corp. out of $10 million in connection with the sale of two pizza restaurant chains.

link




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I don't remember Whitewater. Was it investigated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yes, and there was nothing to it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Here:
Convictions
Ultimately the Clintons were never charged, but 14 other persons were convicted of more than 40 crimes, including a sitting Governor who was removed from office.<33>

  • Jim Guy Tucker: Governor of Arkansas at the time, removed from office (fraud, 3 counts)
  • John Haley: attorney for Jim Guy Tucker (tax fraud)
  • William J. Marks Sr.: Jim Guy Tucker business partner (conspiracy)
  • Stephen Smith (Whitewater): former Governor Clinton aide (conspiracy to misapply funds). Bill Clinton pardoned.
  • Webster Hubbell: Clinton political supporter; Rose Law Firm partner (embezzlement, fraud)
  • Jim McDougal: banker, Clinton political supporter: (18 felonies, varied)
  • Susan McDougal: Clinton political supporter (multiple fraud, contempt of court) Bill Clinton pardoned.
  • David Hale: banker, self proclaimed Clinton political supporter: (conspiracy, fraud)
  • Neal Ainley: Perry County Bank president (embezzled bank funds for Clinton campaign)
  • Chris Wade: Whitewater real estate broker (multiple loan fraud) Bill Clinton pardoned.
  • Larry Kuca: Madison real estate agent (multiple loan fraud)
  • Robert W. Palmer: Madison appraiser (conspiracy). Bill Clinton pardoned.
  • John Latham: Madison Bank CEO (bank fraud)
  • Eugene Fitzhugh: Whitewater defendant (multiple bribery)
  • Charles Matthews (Whitewater): Whitewater defendant (bribery)

    link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Now you have proved without a doubt that you are a Republican operative.
I have assumed so all along and you have just hoisted by your own petard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. chill out... he was just answering someone's question
you see, those are facts. we democrats like them... good or bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. How old are you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Why does that matter?
I read up on this stuff every day. DU, Huff-Po, C&R, Kos.......

You think i'm some 18 year old kid who doesn't have a clue? Sorry to disappoint you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. You lack context.
Goodbye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Well, when you are ASKING a question... you are looking for context
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 02:06 PM by allinktup
Or would you prefer i just pretend to know everything about it and ramble on like a republican?

I am old enough to know that I don't know it all. And apparanly you don't either because you have contributed nothing to this conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. "I have assumed so all along and you have just hoisted by your own petard."?
You've just proved you are willing to say anything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
predfan Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. heh heh heh you said petard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
predfan Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. just as well get this out of the way now..........
here's the one thing Hillary has an advantage in, if you can call it that, and that's the fact there's very little to come out that hasn't already been vetted. She's a tough nut, and a vigorous hard fought campaign, and this situation, will get Obama battle ready. It's comical to hear the pundidts discuss the gutter politics of the Clintons. Anyone remember the McCain treatment in S.C. in 2000 by the Bush organization, or the pictures of Republican deligates in 200w with purple heart bandaids? Get ready for an ugly, bloody campaign this fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. He does seem to need some preparation for battle...
he won his Senate seat in a reportedly easy contest... so... this GE will differ like night and day from his past experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
49. He's getting a lifetime's worth of prep-work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Not till the talking heads go to town on this, no. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Obama made one mistake, associating with Rezko, Not like the Clintons at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Now now now... no bashing...
this is supposed to be a "polite" thread.

I already did my bashing thread today. Although, it wasn't supposed to be one, and I'm the one who got bashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. I certainly think it may be. Word has it that Obama may be mentioned in the court documents.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allinktup Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. i would assume so
he did spend 5 hours on it... it's still 5 hours, so it would be on the record.

but if that's it... no wonder why media isn't covering it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC