Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I suppose no one has considered that the only people hated more than Hillary and Bill by the GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:15 PM
Original message
I suppose no one has considered that the only people hated more than Hillary and Bill by the GOP
and the crossover voters that we need are the Kennedy's? This might help get Obama the nomination but it could kill him in the GE.Way to go! NOT.Should he get the nom, this will be used aginst him big time.So much for "unity"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. That makes no sense.
Are you saying the Kennedys shouldn't have endorsed anyone because the GOP doesn't like them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. It's not dumb at all. The media is largely owned by Republics
and their cronies.

They can start chanting "amnesty" and "Chappaquiddik" day and night and that could be bad news.

But, I don't think that will hold back this tsunami we're watching here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Endorsements are part of strategy.It was not great strategy for the GE to have obvious Kennedy
support. The Kennedys can endorse whomever they please and they did.The family seems split between Obama and Hillary.But any Kennedy endorsement does no nominee any favors in the general election.Do you seriously think we can win without the GOP and the Indees? Don't you think they will bring up evrything about the Kennedy past from Chappaquidick to Patrick's drug use? They will, and more.In Obama's case, for example, with his drug history being exaggerated and flaunted, Patrick Kennedy is not the best person to be at his side, and I like Patrick. But I am a Democrat.Primary endorsements will get more scrutiny in the GE than those after the nom , which can be written off.Just saing, pragmatically for the GE, this is not as wonderful as some think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Saying that Obama won't win the GE. And he won't for a variety of reasons, not including who
endorses him, imo. I don't think it should matter that the Kennedys endorsed him. But then I am neither a Kennedy hater nor a repug. So what do I know? Their endorsement might be a factor in an Obama loss. It shouldn't though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nominated for dumbest post of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Fine choice, but the day's still young. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. My brain fell out as I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. It isn't as though you were using it anyway! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:27 PM
Original message
Put it back in.
You never know when it might come in useful for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I did, actually. But if we really get our people out
the GOP can eat our dust. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. True.
But all of that is thrown out when it comes to "St. Obama". Kennedy is hated by the GOP more than the Clintons. That is a long standing fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackpan1260 Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
13.  When liberals endorse Obama, it is bad.
When moderates endose Obama it is bad.

I love your "logic."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. It may help in in the primary...
but kennedy give him no advantage in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackpan1260 Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. We are all entitled to our ill informed opinions
so I guess you are entitled to yours. Even though it really makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. Ill informed? Hardly.I After more than 30 years in active politics in 3 states
I am not "ill informed".If you are unaware of the Kennedy hatred and how it can be used, it would appear that you may be "ill informed".I do not really care who they endorse but I am merely making an observation.This endorsement could come back and bite Obama in the butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, it occured to me. Kennedy is the devil to the RW. But by the time
the GE comes, a lot will have changed. I don't think endorsements are that important in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not only that, you have to laugh every time an Obama supporter tells us Obama is anti-establishment
You can't get any more Dem establishment than Kerry and now Ted Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Well, you can get a little more.
The Clintons, f'rinstance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Nah.
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 02:28 PM by Harvey Korman
The Clintons are a relatively recent phenomenon compared to the Kennedys. And talk about dynastic politics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
58. Truth be told, there are two Democratic establishments.
The old-guard, FDR/Truman/Kennedy establishment, and the New Democrat/DLC/Clinton establishment. Obama was approached by the DLC, but he spurned their advances, which by default puts him with the old guard Democrats.

There is, of course, a third community - the Wellstone/Kucinich Democratic Democrats, which numbers about 12, last time I checked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. OK, fine.
Obama being such an eloquent speaker is a bad thing for him. Check.

Obama getting so much support from is fans is a bad thing for him. Check.

Obama winning primaries is a bad thing for him. Check.

Now getting endorsements from Kennedys is a bad thing for him? OK, check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
59. Who said any of the rest of that? Not me. I made no such points. I just analyzed a particular
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 03:37 PM by saracat
endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. So much for "unity"?
We are now united in derision from the Republicans. As if without Kennedy's endorsement, the Republicans could find no reason whatsoever to smear Obama.

They were going to find something to drag him down, regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. I certainly agree there. They will find plenty on both candidates.
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. -1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. This about the primaries, not the GE
Kennedy will endorse whoever the Dem nominee ends up being, and it won't hurt that person one bit. Kennedy did what he did to get other Dems to vote for Obama in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. We need to leave fear in the past.
That's what so special about Obama. It's an opportunity to not worry what the Repukes will say or do. Besides, this is a story today, maybe for a while, but it will be long gone by the General Election.

Not to mention that whoever the eventual nominee is, the Kennedys and the Clintons and Edwards and Kerry and every other Democrat will support the nominee of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. It won't matter in the GE. It won't even matter in the primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. So you're really saying Ted should have endorsed Hillary
So the GOP could focus all their hate in one direction?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. Dupe.
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 03:01 PM by saracat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. I personally don't care who Ted endorses. I was just making an observation in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. I have talked to many family and friends in the red states who
have never voted Dem in their life. They were planning to cross parties and vote for Obama for two reasons (1) They are afraid that Hillary will be vindictive against Repubs and (2) They just want to make mischief and propel Obama into the nomination. None of them will vote for him in the general.

This endorsement will give them pause in the primary. As much as they hate Hillary, they hate Ted even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. Good point.And in the GE, they will replay this over and over. It isn't as though what I am sayin
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 02:31 PM by saracat
is something others don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. I love Uncle Teddy
And invoking John Kennedy is not necessarily a bad thing. We shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. So apparently, when liberals endorse Obama, it's bad. When conservatives endorse Obama, it's bad.
You're silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. That's what I said when I heard it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
26. A point but meager
since most of the primary season will simply blow away in the public memory with the GOP voters. The conditioning is seated in the candidates themselves. Only Obama can hurt Obama or if a MSM meme is newly successful. One can suggest that might happen but the burdens imposed upon the Clintons will continue and seem to be unlikely uplifted by the Democratic primaries where a win will not change anything more for the better. The only thing they hope makes it irrelevant is of the GOP takes it upon itself to be in such a state of collapse that they simply lose the control they still own over the fixed, long instilled message. It is why "Chappaquiddick" Ted could not run and win, a simple fearsome political minus regardless of his real worth.

There is much cause for bitterness so long as it is kept directed at the true source of all lies- and it is not, amazing to say, in the Democratic party except as a pale echo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. completely fucking ridiculous
Kennedy's endorsement will have no impact on anyone but those rabid wingers who already hate him. And no, he's not as hated as Hillary and Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. I often agree with you -- but not this time
The people who hate Ted Kennedy are, for the most part,the same people who hate all Democrats and liberals and Hillary and John Edwards.

They're going to pull the lever for an R no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
49. Actually not so.I personally changed the voter registration of 5 GOPers who want to vote for John
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 03:00 PM by saracat
in the Primary.These are long time friends who will vote only for Edwards in the GE and are disillusioned with their own party.But they will not vote for any Dem other than Edwards and they loathe the Kennedy's.If they could be kept on board any issue with the Kennedy's drives them over the edge.That alone would stop any prospect of them voting for Obama! I have argued and argued with them about Ted especially.Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
33. Face it, our 'top' two candidates both have baggage for the GE.
But hey, that is what the MSM wanted. Fact is many more people are voting Dem in the primaries than Rethugs. Are these people going to turn around and vote for the Rethug candidate in November...I doubt it. People are sick and tired of the Rethuglican abuse that we have suffered over the last eight years. Spoken as a person without a dog in this fight. Peace, KIm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
34. What is it about Democrats...
that so piss people off on this board? Democratic representatives with pristine voting records are trashed here on a regular basis. Do we need a more underground, Democratic Underground, for real Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. That was no slam on Teddy or anybody else.
It as an accurate observation that Teddy is second only to the Clintons in his ability to set Puggies and right-tilted indies to foaming at the mouth and gibbering about imagined or real past peccadillos, Vince Fosterisms and other alleged indiscretions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. Endorsements supposedly mean nothing..
whether it is Ted Kennedy or John Kerry, neither of which are running for President, or Dennis Kucinich. Those the 'right' loves to hate, are bashed repeatedly on this board with the same tired, trite, and meaningless bullshit. Are left leaning Democrats seen as a burden to people on this board? People will vote for whoever they want, but I don't understand what the purpose is of dredging those Democrats with the best voting records through the mud, and then proclaim the reasons for their shit-flinging is because they are worried about the big, bad, right. Disingenuous at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
36. And if he had endorsed John Edwards, it would have
been a sign of John Edwards's greatness and readiness to lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Edwards isn't as dependent on wacko Puggy and right-leaning Indie votes
as the Bobbsey Twits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. This is not a candidate post but a strategy obsevation.Take it however you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'm sure if hill got the endorsement instead you would have raised this issue?
NOT!

I'm sorry, you are really cracking me up. This is so transparent and ridicules that it's making me wonder about your mental well being.

Look, I know you've been getting a lot of bad news lately, but this just makes Hill look like an ass. I think her supporters are doing her more harm than those who support other candidates.

How can you say this stuff with a straight face?

It just re-enforces the perception that Hill will say anything to win, after all, her supports will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. No but the Obama Machine would!
They've been spewing out the slime on Hillary since summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. Yes. I would say it if anyone got the endorsement.It is an observation. I am not a Hillary supporter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Sorry if I jumped to conclusions. I will just say I don't agree with your analysis and leave it at
that.

I assume that all Dems will endorse the nominee no matter who it is.

If the Repos want to make an issue out of that, who would listen?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. My point is that it doesn't matter if the Dems support our nom.That is expected. If we lose the
crossovers and Indies, we don't win. And yeah, their votes ARE more important in the GE because they are harder won and necessary for victory!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
50. I like Ted, but he's a lead balloon in the GE. Caroline has starpower though. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
51. The people who it will matter to have already made up their minds. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
52. Like it killed John Kerry?
Saracat, you have lost all perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. This is an entirely different race and will be an entirley different GE.
The ednorsement of JK got little attention because it was "expected".He was the junior Senator from Mass for gods sake, and as for Caroline, the Kennedy's had a connection with JK.It was also no surprise.They went after other stuff with JK.But in reality , I do recall the GOP, in passing, linking JK and the Kennedys in a unflaterring way. But this year is about Indies and hard won GOP crossovers.This could be more of an issue. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. You're bashing the Kennedys for chrissake. Just Stop It. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. I am NOT Bashing the Kennedy's! Where do I bash the Kennedy's?Prove it!
Is it bashing the Kennedy's to state the GOP hate them? And many Indies hate them? That is a fact.I happen to like the Kennedy's but that isn't relevent to the post .Again, Prove I am bashing the Kennedy's tell me where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
56. True
More ammunition for the GOPs in the GE campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC