Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think I am more worried about the Couple who pardoned Marc Rich, thank you very much

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:11 PM
Original message
I think I am more worried about the Couple who pardoned Marc Rich, thank you very much
Marc Rich was part of a system that brought us 9/11, Pakistan the Bomb, and Saddam Hussein weapons after Saddam Hussein gassed the Kurds. That financial system was BCCI, and if you think it belongs in history, you need to read the report. Don't forget that Osama bin Laden had an account there and AQ Khan used it as a slush fund to give away nuclear secrets.


http://fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/index.html

Too bad Bill Clinton threw the BCCI report in the garbage when he entered office in 1993, and then later pardoned one of the figures that needed to be investigated:

http://fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/24appendic.htm

9. BCCI's financing of commodities and other business dealings of international criminal financier Marc Rich. Marc Rich remains the most important figure in the international commodities markets, and remains a fugitive from the United States following his indictment on securities fraud. BCCI lending to Rich in the 1980's amounted to tens of millions of dollars. Moreover, Rich's commodities firms were used by BCCI in connection with BCCI's involving in U.S. guarantee programs through the Department of Agriculture. The nature and extent of Rich's relationship with BCCI requires further investigation.


Don't forget that Marc Rich's lawyer to get him his pardon from President Clinton was Scooter Libby.

I would have rather that Obama never met Rezko nor received money from him. But please show me where Obama acted unscrupulously in his public life because of this donor. I have seen nothing. Meanwhile, I have direct evidence above of what the Clintons do for their "associates".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fact free - just like the BCCI mention - he got a loan, sold commodities, sold oil - but crime was
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 05:16 PM by papau

tax accounting - the same tax accounting that our major oil companies used - where they had no criminal charges and just a very large fine for following Big 8 advice of the day, Reagan refused a fine resolution - a bit like the AGs under Bush being "team players" - the gov hot dog being our current friend Rudy.



9. BCCI's financing of commodities and other business dealings of international criminal financier Marc Rich. Marc Rich remains the most important figure in the international commodities markets, and remains a fugitive from the United States following his indictment on securities fraud. BCCI lending to Rich in the 1980's amounted to tens of millions of dollars. Moreover, Rich's commodities firms were used by BCCI in connection with BCCI's involving in U.S. guarantee programs through the Department of Agriculture. The nature and extent of Rich's relationship with BCCI requires further investigation.

meanwhile, "Did Obama make that 2002 speech as a favor for Rezko and his Arab friends" - that question won't be

asked until after the nomination convention - but the swiftboat ads I am sure are being made as I write.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He was a named figure in the BCCI report in the section
"Matters for further investigation"

He needed to be investigated. They nailed him on the tax fraud. But Clinton wouldn't ALLOW any further investigation of him when he pardoned him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. As if the GOP were not out to help Rudy with his big case - they didn't need squat from the gov to
fund out if there was more there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. That is beyond ridiculous
Are you seriously saying that a brilliant, perceptive speech warning of the dangers of invading Iraq, when there was no proven cause was done as a favor to "Arab friends"? I think that the fact that he was right is sufficient cover.

Rich was out of the country and never tried. Like Al Copone, the first charge that was made was a securities fraud charge. Note that Kerry says investigation is needed - not that you need an indictment. That investigation did not occur. Remember Clinton excused it saying the PM of Israel backed the pardon. (Remember Israel was one party in the arms dealings of Iran/Contra)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let's go to the Bush manufactured scandals now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Wow, I provide real proof of what they did and you call it
"manufactured". Are you questioning a government report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. a couple pardoned Marc Rich?
Lemme go check my constitution...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Remember she was a close advisor to the President....
except when being a close advisor to the President doesn't help her campaign x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Bill Clinton had many close advisors
how many of them pardoned Marc Rich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Oh, that's right - Hillary Clinton knew nothing about the Marc Rich pardon
google at your leisure...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. It doesn't matter who was "involved"
only one person has the power to pardon. To say "the couple who pardoned Marc Rich" is just ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. That's the thing exactly. Hillary et al want all the credit and the "experience"
of whatever was good about the 90's but then just act like their's no connection with anything bad.

To Clinton and her supporters: YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Simple question
according to the constitution, who has the power to grant pardons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. You can't have it both ways. Sorry. Cherry picking credit for things
even Bill Clinton sometimes claim credit for just because they happened in the 90's is lame.

All I ask is Hillary Rodham Clinton stand on her OWN experience, record, and rhetoric. Not her husbands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Please do. I believe it is an issue in this election as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. OK
I just checked - my memory was correct.

Only one person can issue pardons. Nothing at all about couples doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:19 PM
Original message
I was unaware that Hillary was running the country along w/Bill.
Things you learn. I'll not say a word against Bill Clinton. He was the best President we've had since Kennedy. Dems sure know how to eat their own. It's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, you have two choices with that one: Either she was helping Bill run the country
Or her claims of "experience" are complete and total bullshit.

So which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. Sen. Clinton sure thought so....
"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president." - then First Lady Hillary Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. You mentioned that you wish Obama had never met Rezko or
taken money from him. DO you also wish that when Rezko had not purchased the expensive lot near Obama's home in order to secure the real estate deal for Obama and then sell it to the young Senator for far less then he paid for it, a gift of an expensive piece of real estate?

Obama did not just cash a campaign check- he and Rezko were partners in a real estate putchase that was designed to garner Obama an expensive estate at far less then its value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. He has been found of no wrong doing. He cast no vote, wrote no law,
made no action in the legislature or U.S. Senate as a result of the donations or this house deal.

THAT is the only point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. and there's no legal issue around the Marc Rich pardon
the pardon power is absolute. Presidents can pardon anybody they want. It's not subject to review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. There IS a quid pro quo issue with it, wouldn't you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. You don't think
the Clinton's enemies have checked into this in the intervening 8 years?

We're still learning more about Rezko - perhaps you should re-order your concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rush, is that you?
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 05:21 PM by pirhana
make sure you bring up Vince Foster too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. So now you don't even care about Kerry's important work on BCCI?
You're not bothered by that pardon?

Um, Bush punted on the Marc Rich affair. He refused to investigate it when he came into the WH. The Right only talked about Denise Rich. They NEVER talked about BCCI. Please show me where Rush Limbaugh EVER talked about BCCI to shoot down Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Oh please the Clintons are corrupt to the core
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 05:26 PM by sandnsea
Hsu, Trie, Chung, Huang. Then there's the Chatwal Indian business connection.

The funny thing is when you look at the picture of the Clintons and Rezko, it appears the Clintons knew him before Obama did.

Nobody should be supporting them. We're as blind as the Bushbots if we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. And they must be good at it!
70 million (and that's just PUBLIC money!) spent investigating them and they turned up nothing. Then we'll never know how many tens of millions were spent privately trying to pin something on them. Again, nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. The people mentioned have been indicted
and/or convicted. Rezko is ONE. I don't expect to find a boat load of slime connected to him. I expect to find a port next to the Clintons.

And as someone who watched small state, Montana politics for 20 years, puhleeze. I've seen too many politicians leave office wealthy who were as poor as church mice just a few years before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. You're every bit as bad as the freepers
when it comes to this.

AFter being investigated like no other couple in history, they came up clean, and you still insist they're crooked. It's a matter of faith, not evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. And there's no evidence Bush stole Florida either
But he did.

I'm just saying that this is ONE on Obama. I'm not even going to try to justify it because it's stupid to get involved with someone who is under investigation.

The Clintons, on the other hand, have a boat load of Rezko's connected to them and I'll be damned if I let anybody pretend they don't.

And don't call me a freeper. In fact, you need to apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. nobody spent 70 million investigating the Florida election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Hillary was in the Senate
Why didn't she get it done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. And why does it appear the Clintons knew Rezko
before Obama did?

Obama's known him for 17 years. The Clinton picture was taken 11 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I thought it was earlier than that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. so you just make shit up
without checking it. And I'm supposed to believe your crazy conspiracy theories about the Clintons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Note the words "it appears"
which indicates opinion, as opposed to specific names, indictments, and convictions, which indicate fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. You know, this calling people the names of the despised opposition
is really tiresome. Why not respond to the factual presentation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. Perhaps when you and your buddies MAKE a factual presentation
Then maybe others here will consider responding in kind. When confronted with this innuendo-laden bullshit, you'll get exactly what you deserve in response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. was I talkin' to you numbnuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. "$450,000 donation to his library...before he granted Rich a pardon for tax evasion in 2001"
Clinton has also been challenged by members of Congress for accepting a reported $450,000 donation to his library from the former wife of fugitive financier Marc Rich before he granted Rich a pardon for tax evasion in 2001. Neither Clinton nor the Rich family confirmed the donation.

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. What a twisted, steaming pile of shit
So Clinton is tangled up in allowing 9/11 and WMDs to Iraq now? My god what will the desperate and hysterical Obamabots dredge up next;

- http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp">The Clinton Body count?
- http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/panthers.asp">Hillary and the Black Panthers
- http://www.snopes.com/rumors/clinton.htm">Clinton soft on terrorists?

the lot of you has now officially out-crazied the Free Republic. Congrats. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Oh, no, if you check Freeperville, they try to pin BCCI on Kerry,
the guy who actually investigated it.

Wow, so everyone is JUST FINE with the pardon of Marc Rich orchestrated by Scooter Libby?

Okay, just thought everyone should know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Rather disingenuous response there
This wasn't just about a simple pardon, you tried to taint Clinton with Hussein, WMDs, and 9/11. That is some of the vilest propaganda seen here yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. And straight from Freeperville, no doubt.
Geezus. The crap in here is getting deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. Long-Term Political Memory KICK AND REC!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hillary killed Vince Foster too and she's a LESBIAN!!!!1!!1!! I'm SERIES!1!!!!!!
:rofl: This is really getting to be pathetic and I've only been in this forum for a day! I've never seen such childish, immature bullshit in a campaign. If you want to attack someone why don't you try attacking GEORGE BUSH! Or maybe one of the REPUKE candidates?:think: What a novel idea.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. More republican talking points
The republicans still go on and on and on about this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
46. Clinton regrets Marc Rich pardon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC