Dear Clinton Supporters: Why will your woman not call for impeachment?

[Stinky The Clown]

[mac2]

1. Or Obama or Edwards?

[Stinky The Clown]

2. Answer for her. There is an identical thread for them too ..... look around

I posted the very same thread to each of them.

[thedeanpeople]

12. <deketed>

[MonkeyFunk]

3. Because she can count to 67

and no responsible Senator would call for impeachment - they're the jury.

[Stinky The Clown]

4. We've ahd that discussion before, you and me

Its still the wrong answer.

Will she allow them to get away scott free? Will she ignore the crimes they committed?

[MonkeyFunk]

5. Which other candidate do you think will prosecute them?

[Stinky The Clown]

8. I don't know

I am waiting in my other threads for answers similar in sentiment to yours and asking that very question.

But why does that matter to you? I asked the question specifically of you (not you personally but you as a Clinton supporter). What does the other candidate's views have on what your answer would be?

It isn't really a good tactic to answer a direct, clear question by asking how some other person answered it. If you want to know that, why not ask them, not me?

[rinsd]

7. "no responsible Senator would call for impeachment - they're the jury."

Bingo

[Stinky The Clown]

11. You edited after I replied

But okay ...... and that answer, while technically true, holds no water. They're not a legal jury, they're a political jury. There are only a few possible 'sentences' so they can say any damned thing they want.

Have you forgotten Big Dawg's impeachment. The senators were slobbering all over themselves rushing to call for his head on a pike and they mostly all got reelected.

[here_is_to_hope]

6. ...

:popcorn:

[Stinky The Clown]

13. How original.

[pat_k]

9. A big kick!! (and Rec). This is precisely what we need to be doing. . .

Posted something on the subject earlier today. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4223011&mesg_id=4243302

[mtnsnake]

10. She's the same as the other two when it comes to impeachment. Gutless & self serving

None of them even had the balls to say the word or to call for justice being brought to Bush for fear of political reprisal. Wimps, all of them.

[quickesst]

14. Well, first off.....

she's Bill's woman. Secondly, who here, unless they have had a personal converstation with Clinton, asked the question, and recieved an answer directly from her, could possibly answer. Same goes for the other candidates. Without personal knowledge it is illogical to expect an answer to your question. Had you given it a tad more thought, perhaps you could have worded it, "Given what you know about Hillary Clinton, what is your opinion on her views concerning impeachment, and your best guess as to why she has not called for it to this point?" Of course the logical answer has already been given, but, in my personal opinion, she is the only one of the candidates who will seek accountability. Now would not only be illogical, but quite a blunder on any of the candidates part. I doubt there are many law enforcement officers who inform criminals that they are coming after them. Thanks.
quickesst

[Stinky The Clown]

15. " ........ she's Bill's woman." WHAAAAAAAAAAT??????

I can't even read the rest of your response.

She's Bill's woman?

What is this? Cave Man America?????

[FlyingSquirrel]

17. Well that was bound to happen 'cause of your phrasing...

Although, if it had been an OP about Obama or Edwards and you'd said "your man", there would have been no similar response.

Interesting huh?

[quickesst]

21. And since he didn't say....

"your man", how can you possibly know that there would not have been an attempt to inject a little humor in those threads? Around here, it seems, you're expected to be a fortune teller, or think you are one. Like everyone else who is not personally privy to the candidates feelings, and personal opinions, I cannot give an honest answer to the question in the op, without speculating, and guessing, which the op did not call for. Logic is at home crying right now. Thanks.
quickesst

[Stinky The Clown]

27. There were two other OP, and both said "Your Guy"

Missed them, didja?

[quickesst]

18. Way to take...

the easy way out. If you can't recognize a little humor, it is no wonder that you are a failure at asking logical, and pertinent questions. Your reply is a simple-minded dodge. Thanks.
quickesst

[Stinky The Clown]

28. You make a career out of taking issue with the minutia and avoiding direct questions?

You know damn good and well what was meant with the colloquial questioning phrase in the OP. To say otherwise is to be an obfuscating liar. And you know it. So get off that horse and answer the question. Or keep up your line of blather and remove all doubt from the minds of those who wonder about your meaning.

[agdlp]

16. She will work for bipartisan solutions not gridlock House/Senate

She will stand her ground on party values, at the same time work with the Repulicans to solve our problems, not gridlock the House/Senate in imposing a vindictive policy. Thus keep track on the ball, namely focusing on the issues at hand:

Iraq, education, health care, economy.

[BootinUp]

19. I doubt it.

do you think there was ever a realistic chance for it?

[hayu_lol]

20. This OP wasted three separate threads on a question that has been ...

answered several times.

The House Impeaches. Trial is in the Senate. If judged guilty as charged in the Senate, then the Senate removes the parties from office.

The Senate does not call for impeachment. After 10-11 months, Dennis's resolution for the impeachment of Cheney has about 25 supporters. Not sufficient to bring it to the floor for a vote.

[Stinky The Clown]

24. Hey genius ......

ANYone can call for impeachment. It isn't a formal process. You just point to someone in certain government offices and say "Impeach the motherfucker".

You can do it. I can do it. Osama bin Fucking Laden can do it.

The fact that your candidate is also a senator doesn't mean jack shit to 'calling for impeachment'.

I'm just sayin .......

Discussing impeachment is a "waste" of precious threads? :rofl:

[Clintonite]

22. Because it is a waste of fucking time!! There are too many important things

to get done than to get revenge on those criminals!! Their time is comming.

[Stinky The Clown]

25. "Their time is comming."

Really? When? is there going to be an investigation in the early days of the new administration? Is there the stom,ach to put a former US president in the slammer?

Or do you mean their time is coming when they're free to cash in bigger than they have and then go to Paraguay to clip coupons? When and what is that time that's coming?

[robcon]

23. Because it is a really, really bad idea!!!

As Pelosi believes, an impeachment circus would lead to fewer Democrats in the House and Senate from the 2008 elections, and a smaller chance that a Dem will be in the White House next year.

[Stinky The Clown]

26. Oh. Okay. Better to go along to get along, huh?

I'm an old fuck. I can easily say I don't give a shit about the future and won't have to suffer any consequences. But I actually care. Even about those who will be alive after I'm a dead old fuck. And I think that NOW is the time for the line to be drawn in the sand.

[polpilot]

29. She's for/against

impeachment. For/Against the war. Working for health care for all (Since 1992). Focused like a laser for 16 years. Focused...focused...less focused...more focused..election year...more focused...off election year, less focused, working for change, working hard....

[Stinky The Clown]

30. I hope you didn't mistake me for a Clinton basher

I'm not.

[polpilot]

34. They are capable

of bashing themselves...no help needed.

[ErnestoG]

31. "Why isn't Obama or Edwards?" is NOT an answer to this thread

Hillarzombies, try answering honestly for once. The question was:

Why doesn't your candidate call for impeachment?

[HughMoran]

32. Actually it is the answer

Just because you can't deal with reality, doesn't change what is fact.

[Stinky The Clown]

33. If that's a fact, then maybe the candidates outght to all be named .....

.... Edbamaton? :shrug:

[HughMoran]

35. I like the sound of that

:D