Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: "Obama's apparent snub of Clinton in the Senate chamber wasn't missed by many"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:13 AM
Original message
MSNBC: "Obama's apparent snub of Clinton in the Senate chamber wasn't missed by many"
MSNBC is running with last night's incident too:

...Watching last night’s State of the Union, anyone else get the sense that President Bush was just glad to be done? He had the smirk going for about half the speech, and then came the Iraq portion when the smirk did go away and he made what seemed like a very familiar argument about Iraq and foreign policy. The problem for Bush, of course, is just that: The argument is familiar, and it's unclear whether he has anyone listening to him anymore. As for how the presidentials handled the SOTU, a few things: 1) Mitt Romney seemed hesitant to pin the "broken Washington" tag on Bush when given the chance; 2) Obama's apparent snub of Clinton in the Senate chamber wasn't missed by many (just how bitter is this race?)...

More: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/29/617344.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. yawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wow MSNBC had been running
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 10:16 AM by neutron
"Camelot" nonstop yesterday. Maybe this brought them to their senses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. That's exactly what I called it. I wrote a column about it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4263816

It was - um - underwhelming to say the least. But kind of what we've come to expect from this useless, scheming, vindictive, arrogant halfwit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. MFS
more fucking shit

thank you - may i have anoother
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. So sad..and very telling on Obamas part
'troubling" is the word I'd use...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. This was intentionally staged by the Clintons. Hill had met with Kennedy earlier in the evening.
She is disgusting. And I will not mince words.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. HA! The first "Obama-was-a-Hillary-plant" excuse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. And clintons. But should we expect that from her, which is why you don't care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Interpreting "non-verbals" is FAR from an *exact* social science. Give it a rest.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Some snub...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. The other angle cuts out Mccasgill
That looks like the same time - those pictures really should be put together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, the media would have been forced to speak about Bush's speech.
No surprise they run with this, even though there is nothing there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obama's already said he wanted to give Kennedy and Hil a private moment. It's pretty obvious that's
what was going on there. But for some, the spin is more exciting than the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. But.... but.... but.... the TEE VEE stations weren't supposed to pick this UP!!
It was just a few whiney bloggers....yeah....that's the ticket!!! And no one noticed....yeah...that's the ticket...and it...it...it never HAPPENED!!!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. There's A Pattern Here - Anytime Obama Does Good Or Has A Good Day The Hillary Folk.....
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 10:28 AM by global1
and the MSM will find the smallest most inane thing or issue and hammer it to blow it up into a scandal. Where have I seen these tactics before? Oh ya - the last 8 years with *Co.

It is clear whom the corporate media want as their president and it's not Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. PING!!!!!!!! exactly - Well Stated! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
14. yep, the good you received from the kennedy endorsement
was not the image folks went to bed with last night. The image is two fold. They saw HRC come onto their screens all smiles and happy and meeting and greeting folks and smiling when she shook Ted's hand and what did they see from you? yep! that tis the negative image of you being an ass. You most likely pouted and you might have even thought you should ahve received a standing ovation as you entered the chamber.......you most likely visualized you walking into that same chamber in 2009 and hearing all the appaulse, but your mind brought you back to reality after you saw it was HRC up there giving the state of the union message....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I wonder if Ted gave Obama a blistering talking to. No.
Ted has been positioning himself for weeks to be the one administering the smack down to Bill Clinton for bad behavior. Ted placed himself on the moral high ground.

We now know that the entire episode of Ted supposedly talking tough to Bill, his giving interviews about his "need" for the smack down of Bill with all the righteous indignation he could muster and the Obama campaign pumping out press and comments was all part of a long term strategy.

Ted is a colossal hypocrite just trying to become relevant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. how many times are you going to post dupes of your own spam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC