Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why isn't Hillary's "triangulation" working with independents?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:09 PM
Original message
Why isn't Hillary's "triangulation" working with independents?
so- disclaimers first: I'm no fan of Ms. Clinton. But my question is not rhetorical or a backhand against her.

Long before this primary race got going - in fact since her run for the Senate - Hillary has followed a "general national election strategy" eschewing the support of progressives like myself in favor independents who might be convinced to vote Democratic. It's the same strategy that Bill followed in his campaigns, and in his governance. Pundits call this "triangulation". And while this has irked the hell out of me, pragmatically it has arguable appeal. In short, I've always feared that triangulation works.

So, can anyone explain why Hillary is doing so much better with registered Democrats than she is with independents who have voted Democratic. Why are independents going for Obama when Clinton has gone to such great lengths to attract their votes? Why have long-term, "hard-core" Democrats voted for Hillary more than Obama? What gives?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
_Wayne_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary never "triangulated." Spew your nonsense elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. oh for God's sake - her vote for the war was triangulation
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 08:16 PM by DeadElephant_ORG
and that's just the start.

Do you think that when Bill passed "welfare reform" - which ended forever our nation's obligation to our destitute - that wasn't triangulation?

Please get over your defensiveness so that we can have a meaningful conversation, and can work together toward putting a Democrat in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. perhaps "triangulation"
has just become strangulation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Since most independents usually vote Republican they
have bought into the irrational RW Hillary hatred. That's why. They could vote for Edwards, Obama or even just stay home if McCain isn't the Republican candidate but they will vote for McCain if he's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. VERY interesting point - but if that's true...
her effort to reach independents was doomed from the start. She would have attained more support - and more fervent support - if she'd been reaching out to "the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party". (Howard Dean)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Without a doubt. She should have saved that strategy for
after the primaries although I don't think it would have worked there either for the reasons I state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because approx. 45% of the country has said they will never vote for her no matter what
She can run against Satan himself (Huckabee???) and she can't top 52%.

Her negatives are higher than any other candidate since they started keeping track of that kinda crap.

She can't win independents. McCain can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think it's because a lot of independents have the attitude of "a pox
on both your houses". It has been so nasty and hateful since Bill took office that you have an entire generation of people who are just plain tired of the nastiness and the partisanship. An independent is an independent for a reason. I believe Obama is doing well with this group because he is giving them a message they've been wanting to hear ... a "change". Obama is specifically campaigning on making a difference in the tone and behavior in Washington. He has a policy (I've read it), but the pieces of the speeches that the MSM show us aren't the policy portion of his stump. They bring us the rhetorical portions of his speeches. And it is something that the independents want to hear and be a part of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. She won the independent vote in Florida today with Obama and Edwards tied for second
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I can't find confirmation of that, but given the size of her victory, it's probably true.
But I did find some interesting data:

according to MSNBC:
Both parties’ electorates were older than in any other presidential contest this year. A third or more in each primary were at least 65 years old. In earlier Democratic contests no more than a quarter were senior citizens, and on the Republican side only the Nevada caucuses came anywhere close to Florida in the proportion of older voters.

and:
In the Democratic primary, two-thirds were white, about one in five were black and a little more than one in 10 were Hispanic.
—About one in seven voters in each party’s primary described themselves as independents.

So even assuming she won the independents, there were other factors that were probably more predictive of the outcome. It was the same thing with Obama in SC: he won the women's vote, but apparently only because he won black women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC