Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Iraq tip debate to Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:14 PM
Original message
Did Iraq tip debate to Obama?
Did Iraq tip debate to Obama?
Posted: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:00 PM by Chuck Todd

From NBC's Chuck Todd
At about 9:15, I was toying with the following lead to my post-debate wrap, "Nobody lost this debate, let's make that clear." And then the subject shifted to Iraq, that's when this debate turned Obama's way.

Both candidates started out soft and strong; it appeared another kumbaya debate was about to take place.

And then came Iraq and Clinton once again showed why the issue has been such an Achilles heel. Obama just has an easier time talking about his position. Clinton has to sit there and re-explain why she was for it and why she's not for it now. It's never a good moment for her which is the recent shift to the economy has been so welcomed by Team Clinton.

Overall, this was a strong night for Obama as he proved that he belonged on the same stage as Hillary Clinton. And that's an important accomplishment for Obama. Because, I keep wondering, are undecided voters waiting to see if Obama can prove his mettle for the presidency?

There's a theory that believes just that. And if that theory is true then this debate could prove to be very important to Obama. The audience for this debate was undecided voters and former Edwards supporters and I'm guessing these folks have a fairly low bar for Obama to prove himself to them, compared to the bar they have for Clinton since they are still not on board with the more well-known candidate. Think about the progress Obama's made in the debate department since early '07. She regularly cleaned his clock at these early debates but now that advantage seemed to disappear. And Clinton can't afford for that gap to disappear.

It's interesting that neither candidate is feeling the pressure of losing on Feb. 5; If anything, one gets the sense that both candidates realize this campaign could go on a few more months so no sense throwing any desperate attacks tonight. Neither candidate took crazy shots at each other which tells me that neither thinks they are behind.

Obama's strongest moments may have been toward the end when the debate shifted to Iraq. Clinton struggles to defend her actions at the time with her new position now and it just doesn't come across well. If this debate were being scored like a boxing match, the first 60 minutes would have been judged as a draw but the last 30 minutes would have been given to Obama on points, thanks to the Iraq issue.

If Obama does go on to defeat Clinton for the nomination, he will join McCain in winning his party's nod on the back of Iraq, even as the issue landscape has shifted to the economy. Go figure.

Two other extraneous thoughts: Democratic Party elders should be ecstatic about the civil tone the two kept throughout the debate. Contrast the tone tonight with McCain v. Romney last night. ... And CNN did the Democratic Party no favors by filling the audience with celebrities. Maybe that's good for CNN to have those folks to cut to during the broadcast but it only feeds into the stereotype that Hollywood and the Democratic Party are inseparable.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/31/627363.aspx#comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Absolutely.
n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. She Showed Experience Does Count
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 10:21 PM by neutron
Her responses had breadth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. bad breadth!
She talked too long on all of her answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. can't concentrate that long???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. She didn't make that case with me at all.
I'm proud of both candidates and should Hillary win the nomination, I'll certainly support her.

But I still very strongly favor Barack in all areas, experience included.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. apt analysis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. No Way! Her Approach is actualy THOUGHT OUT
and more sophisticated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. She didn't show that with her answers on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, absolutely.
I am proud of the way he handled it while Hillary stammered and tried to justify her vote. He was fantastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. She prevaricates on Iraq.
Her vote was indefensible and she knows it so she lies about it. The truth is she was trying to cover her ass in anticipation of running for president. She thought voting against it would hurt her in the general election. She was wrong, voting FOR it will hurt her, but she didn't know that then. Her vote was both incredibly calculating and a complete MIScalculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. If that is all you care about n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. you don't care about Iraq?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. "all" is a modifier
It is not all I care about. I happen to think her explanation is fine.
I voted for Kerry and he said pretty much the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes it did
Can't have a flip-flopper on this issue vs the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama had a strong finish. Hillary's Hallmark moment finish seemed off the mark n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agdlp Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
8.  Obama Anti-war voice muted in Senate.Didn’t make a floor speech on the war until one year in office
Once elected to the U.S. Senate, however, his anti-war voice became muted. Obama supported unconditional funding for the Iraq War in both 2005 and 2006. And–despite her false testimonies before Congress and her mismanagement of Iraq policy before, during, and after the U.S. invasion in her role as National Security Advisor–Obama broke with most of his liberal colleagues in the Senate by voting to confirm Condoleezza Rice as secretary of state during his first weeks in office.

Obama didn’t even make a floor speech on the war until a full year after his election. In it, he called for a reduction in the number of U.S. troops but no timetable for their withdrawal. In June 2006, he voted against an amendment by Senators Russ Feingold and John Kerry for such a timetable.

In addition, during the 2006 Democratic congressional primaries, he campaigned for pro-war incumbents–including Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman against his eventually victorious primary challenger Ned Lamont–and other conservative Democrats fighting back more progressive anti-war challengers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. still better than Hilary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. No, it didn't tip it for him....
it isn't at the top of the list for Americans right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It will be when Republicans force the issue
And it will be costly for Dems if we have a flip-flopper up there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Nope.....
hell, lots of them no longer support the war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, definitely. But Hillary really looked more knowlegeable on Health Care
But I think the Iraq War thing was far larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. How can you say you are all about the future,
but focus on what happened in the past?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Excellent critique.
Spot on.

These relaxed, sit down formats favor Obama for some reason.

I watched most of the first hour, and (to me) it seemed like Wolf was lobbing softballs to Clinton, but aiming more heated questions towards Obama, like he was trying to rattle his confidence.

But Obama held his own, and it sounds like I missed the best part of the debate.

Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. It did indeed.
Refusing to admit she made a mistake makes her look weak, IMO. She ended up droning on and on and on going in circles to try and explain her position. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hillary soundly thumped Obama on all the other questions
The IWR question was nothing new. Hillary couldn't hit it out of the park but she defended herself well and walked away with a single. The audience monitor lines showed Hillary did OK.

Overall, it was a great debate for both but Hillary was by far the winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC