Undecided Voters break 60-40 for Hillary after watching debate

[Herman Munster]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRmUrdjsCI8

[andyrowe]

1. Doesn't say how many undecideds they had in their pool.

I'll bet it was literally 3 to 2.

[Name removed]

3. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[andyrowe]

10. Oh really?

3 to 2 indicates a pool of 5 people. 3/5 equals .6 or 60%. 2/5 equals .4 or 40%.

How would two voters be divided 60%-40%?

Stupidest.Troll.Ever

And on what grounds do you call me a Troll?

[niceypoo]

20. The foolishness of the post, for one

Your other posts today are equally shallow

[Nailzberg]

13. It's your math that needs fixing.

3 to 2

Five total votes


3/5 = 6/10 = 60/100
2/5 = 4/10 = 40/100


First grade shit.

[andyrowe]

34. Let me quote this before you edit it.

OMG. Are you THAT poor at math?


How would two voters be divided 60%-40%?

Stupidest.Troll.Ever

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I'll always have this to cherish.

[andyrowe]

36. Won't anyone clue Lirwin2 in?

:rofl:

[Clintonista2]

6. Sigging your comment by the way

[andyrowe]

12. HAHAHA!!

You sig has misquoted my unedited post.

I feel sorry for you, you angry little person.

[Indenturedebtor]

14. Bwahahaha

I hope you walk around for awhile with that sig. You're funny you make me laugh hahahahaha.

[andyrowe]

16. Lirwin will probably edit this for a delete soon.

*chuckle*

[joshcryer]

15. Pwned in so many ways.

Haha, beautiful.

[andyrowe]

17. Thanks. But perhaps Lirwin was just twisting what I said.

Under Clinton-think, one could pretend I meant it as a range of people even if they knew otherwise. This is how they operate.

[jgraz]

23. Lirwin FTW with another brilliant act of self-pwnage.

:rofl:

[Jed Dilligan]

21. Do you know how bad you look right now?

Anyone can tell that you changed the little word "to" to the little word "or" in your sigline.

What a tacky, sleazy, small-minded, pointless, irritating, nasty, foul thing to do.

[andyrowe]

22. It may have been a simple mistake.

Poor fellow prolly signed off right after changing their sig to that. Now I'm feeling almost guilty about the gloating I've done since.

I do want to say the debate had me feeling like we're all in this together again. Don't misconstrue my defense of my math skills as a reactionary stab at a Clinton supporter. It was the funniest exchange I've had on DU in some time.

[Jed Dilligan]

24. I don't think it could have been a mistake

Though I guess if he/she retyped rather than cut-and-pasted, it could be chalked up to a Freudian slip.

I feel the same way after the debate, but it doesn't change how I feel about these "tactics."

[jgraz]

25. Funny how these simple mistakes always seem to work in favor of whoever makes them

:freak:

[andyrowe]

26. There is a tactic issue here.

I'm not entirely proud of the tone I struck but the troll accusation set me off coupled with the awful math. It's the first time I've ever been quoted in a DU sig. That's something to be proud of even if it's a distorted quote.

I'd love to see their face when/if they come back to this thread later.

[mrreowwr_kittty]

32. OMG. I took your dumb ass off ignore just to see what a fool you'd made of yourself

Sure enough, I wasn't disappointed.

[loveangelc]

2. wow out of like 8 people...

[maximusveritas]

4. All of whom were white or Hispanic

[ErnestoG]

7. How's that for a mandate.....

*chuckle*

[andyrowe]

28. It was a tiny pool of people but

you can't get 60/40 from a pool of 8.

[Nailzberg]

5. The real time respondant focus group was about 15 people.

Have any idea what the margin of error is for that?

FOX did the same thing, and they were about 70-30 for Obama. Neither one is reliable, the sample is too small.

[andyrowe]

30. Agreed

[CoffeeCat]

8. This was a CNN group, right?

They showed the CNN group after the debate.

There were probably 30 in the room.

Wolf said the majority agreed that Obama did better on the Iraq issue, and
that they split 60-40 for Clinton.

[DJ13]

9. You are aware (I hope) that CNN rigged that "undecided" vote

CNN set the group up with nearly 50% Hispanics.

(Admitted to on-air when asked by an email in the after debate analysis.)

Clearly they were hoping to stack the results in Hillarys favor in a state that the Hillary campaign themselves have said they do best with the Hispanic voters.

[milkyway]

11. Ha Ha Ha! How desperate can you get! You're even more misleading than your candidate.

[andyrowe]

18. Just to highlight my exchange w/ Lirwin2 at the start of this thread...

I'll K&R!

[Nailzberg]

19. kick in honor of Mr. Anderson, math teacher

Why did they always ask you to show your work? If I can correctly guess a random number given the infinite possibilities, that should be worth the points right there.

[andyrowe]

27. I used to know a math teach that used to often say

That the lottery is a tax on the mathematically challenged.

[joshcryer]

29. Which has a sweet irony to it because most lottery profits go to fund *education*. :)

[andyrowe]

31. Maybe Lirwin2 should buy some lotto tickets.

Bam

[juajen]

38. My God, this is ridiculout. Piling on, anybody?

We had such a short truce. Blame it all on MoveOn.

[Jed Dilligan]

39. This is not about candidates

This is about some extremely obvious, extremely bad behavior that represents the very worst of DU. I, for one, plan to keep this thread kicked at least until that sigline goes away.

[suston96]

33. Audience voted 60-40 for Hillary also.

[UALRBSofL]

35. CNN was just talking about the Latino vote

And said Hillary leads by 40% over Obama in the Latino community. We'll see how it all pans out tuesday. Obama's sending his A team out there tomorrow.

[rodeodance]

37. ALL FIRED UP FOR THE LADY