|
Good for Barak:
I would agree that Hillary voting for the IWR was a bad thing. I think she was one of those Democrats who were feigning naivet'e when it seemed clear that Bush could not be trusted.
Obama appears be incorporating more elements of Edwards' message as well.
Obama has a very charismatic personality, and would present a stark contrast to McCain. McCain might not want to debate at all if Obama wins the nomination.
Good for Hillary:
Hillary has a superior position on health care, though neither one has a proposal that eliminates the health insurance companies, which I think is the only solution that would save money. However, i believe that both of them are using their conservative health care plans to get the ball rolling. Republicans would vote against almost any health care plan, and a very modest plan would be the only chance to succeed unless we had 60% democrats in the senate to override a fillibuster.
She has shown to have a very well-organized thought process, and would do well against John McCain in debates. Though, I expect the MSM to dumb-down their questions in the democratic vs republican debates for that very reason. I also expect Mr. McCain to be wearing one of those hidden ear pieces --- we'll see.
Good for both:
They both showed themselves in a good light, which helps reduce the uncertainty about Barak, and the negatives about Hillary as a person (most republican anti-Hillary people can't even say why because they're picking up the message from right-wing media). I expect the republicans to keep Mccain separated from either of them as much as possible, as McCain is certainly showing his age. In comparison, the democrats are both mentally sharp.
|