|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:20 PM Original message |
CNN: Richardson likely to endorse Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:21 PM Original message |
that would be a good endorsement for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. It makes sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. This would be a great endorsement for Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
featherman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
3. Very much expected and will help lock up NM for Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Nowhere does it say on CNN that Richardson is likely to endorse Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Obama is meeting Richardson today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. "Sorry, Barack, but I'm endorsing Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. There was an article yesterday saying he stood a very good chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. The article was wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:30 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. You don't know that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Did Richardson publicly announce that he's going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Watching the Super Bowl with somebody is not indicative of an endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. I'm an Obama supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. I'm neutral |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
36. And you know this how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. Because I can see the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. But Bill is watching the superbowl with him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. There are no coincidences this late in the game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. The two Bill's are watching the Super Bowl together. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. At the very least, that is a symbolic endorsement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. How do we "know" that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
52. Is he doing any kind of photo-op |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. You keep ignoring the fact that Obama is meeting Richardson today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Bill talked to Ted Kennedy before he endorsed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. And what's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. The point is that you don't make a public show of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. So when did Bloomberg endorse Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Bloomberg didn't drop out of the race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
45. He wasn't in the race, was he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
34. How very true! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
49. Bill C wouldn't be watching the Super Bowl with Bill R unless he was wooing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. I don't think Bill R would be making a public display |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. It'll be interesting to see what -- if anything -- transpires. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
14. I nominate this for the most misleading post of the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. "obvious implications for the much sought after endorsement of Richardson" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
43. No, it really doesn't. It's pure spin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
18. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
20. He endorsed her at the October debate in Philly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
24. Not surprising -- he's DLC all the way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
featherman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
26. Well, it's either true or not true. I would expect it and would be stunned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indie_voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
27. If true. Congratulations to the Clinton campaign. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
28. That's too bad. I was just thinking an Obama/Richardson ticket would be good. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. On paper, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. That's true, but MSM disappeared John Edwards in 2004, so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
31. With all the lies being posted around here lately... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I'm an Obama supporter, n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pawel K (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
47. lol. ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KennedyGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
33. Way to Go!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
40. nothing like discussing politics over hotwings, beer, and football |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REDFISHBLUEFISH (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
41. Hillary 08, because we need a leader, not a CHANGE of diapers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
46. kind of expected. I'd be very surprised if NOT true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
50. Doesn't he know that she most likely already played the VP game with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. That's The Hillary Administration, thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
53. Richardson should chill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
featherman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
54. Obama on Richardson. From MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Wow, thank you for your candid honesty! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knowledgeispwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
56. I'm not sure the title matches the article, but good news for Sen. Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-01-08 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
59. DLC member supports DLC member |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC