Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There's no difference between the Dem candidates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:36 PM
Original message
Poll question: There's no difference between the Dem candidates
Which Dem camp/supporters do you hear this from the most (if not constantly)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good eye, sniffa.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is a line the Hillary people were pushing during the summer and fall.
It mostly ended after the Philly debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But, they're still pushing it.
I rolled my eyes then, and I roll them now. :eyes:

It's a good strategy, but it's bullshit. I see it posted it at least 20+ times a day here, and that's including all of my ignores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And the Edwards people jumped on
and now don't know the difference between Clinton campaign rhetoric and reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't trust those Mercerites!
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 11:02 PM by ThatPoetGuy
But no, I'm pushing that theme. I'm an Edwards supporter in denial; I can't accept yet that he's out of the race and I'll have to take one of the squabbling self-involved twits who never pushed forward any big ideas.

HRC: "I'm the candidate with the experience to fight the Republicans and legislate well."

BO: "I bring change and unity."

JE: "This country is shafting its poor people, the workers, and the sick. Let's change this."

Clinton and Obama have made their campaigns about themselves: the messenger and not the message. All three had very similar policies -- Obama is different from the others on health care, because he opposes mandates, and justifies it dishonestly; Edwards was different from the other two on Iraq, because he was only planning to leave enough troops to guard the embassy.

If I had to rank them:

in terms of legislative history, Obama has the best record, followed by Edwards, followed by Hillary -- and even Hillary has a far better record than any of the Repugnicans.

in terms of policies, Edwards was best, followed by Hillary (who just copied Edwards), followed by Obama -- and even Obama has far better policies than any of the Repugnicans.

in terms of the message a candidate sends out into the world, affecting real shifts in the way people think about things, Edwards was the best in my lifetime. Hillary has been too cautious, putting her in a distant, distant second, and Obama's messages -- from "achieving unity" with evildoers to his attacks on mandated care to his refusal to condemn virulent gay-bashers to his dishonest criticisms of labor unions, trial lawyers, Paul Krugman, and others, to portraying a woman in politics as a witch -- Obama's messages have been the worst. Several Repugnicans have spread a more liberal message than Obama's: Giuliani's message was strongly in favor of gay rights, Huckabee's message is oriented more towards helping the poor and the sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. What?
This poll makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Agreed
But only because Gravel has no votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Little difference between the top two
when it comes to the important issues such as the Iraq war, globalization, privitization, security, borders, signing statement silence (not a peep), etc.

Neither demanding our Constitution and rights back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. When there's been an "Obama" on every ballot for 28 years
then you can talk to me about how they're the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC