Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Talks Up the 'Dream Ticket'....Strategically.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:29 PM
Original message
Hillary Talks Up the 'Dream Ticket'....Strategically.
Fuck that. The ONLY Dream Ticket will have Obama at the top. Period!

****

Hillary Talks Up the 'Dream Ticket'
February 01, 2008 6:19 PM

Sen. Hillary Clinton was interviewed on the Tavis Smiley Show and guess what -- she's talking up the Clinton/Obama "dream ticket."

Doing that allows her to convey to voters that maybe they don't have to choose between her and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois. Maybe they can have them both!

“I think last night on the stage seeing the two of us was just so exciting for so many people,” she tells Smiley. “I can’t tell you how many calls and e-mails I’ve gotten from people who never cared about politics that much but they are just thrilled at that.”

Clips from the show will be available HERE.

Clinton supporters are playing up this "dream ticket." Obama supporters are not.

Make no mistake -- the smiles, hugs, and chivalry on display for voters last night belie an intense dislike the two candidates have for one another.

Obama resents the race-baiting campaigning the Clintons have engaged in.

The Clintons see Obama as standing in her way, and belittling their legacy.

Enemies have joined together before -- witness JFK and VP LBJ.

But, as Donna Brazile says, this isn't a dream ticket -- it's a fantasy ticket.

"There is blood on the ground," Brazile says.

We're taking a look at this tonight on World News with Charles Gibson.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/hillary-talks-u.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's too much blood
on the ground and in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another mean, hateful post.
Keep up the good work.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's obvious that that's exactly what she's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. These whiny Hillaryphiles and their feigned outrage are beyond silly.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It's mean to say I won't be satisfied with Obama as Hillary's veep?
It's hateful to call Hillary and her supporters out for trying to hoodwink voters into believing they don't actually have to choose...real change?

Baloney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. Not sure about that...
but calling HRC supporters Hillaryphiles I think lacks the image of change and unity the Obama people might be going for. Clinton and Obama are on the side, team and direction, the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Thanks for your concern but ...
it was meant to be descriptive of those who love Hillary. Simple as that. There are many tacky labels posted here on DU to get worked up about. This is not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. My point is I call
the Obama people Obama people and Clinton people Clinton people. At town hall meetings we try to stay away from names that are anti-productive.

To this subject...Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton would be an amazing ticket, some to inspire to and not turn into a drudge report type clip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. I notice that you have een here less than a month, so first I say welcome to DU
Please consider Obamaphile or Hillaryphile are RELATIVELY benign, as -phile only means "fondness for" - compared to "Obamaton" or "Hillbot" and all the others, it is not so bad.

In general, I do agree that we should at least be discussing (even arguing is fine) differences in policy or even leadership qualities, without going down the slippery slope of childish namecalling and tit for tat insults. Signal to noise ratio.

Again, welcome. Please stack around and help to raise the discourse here, and if you get tired of the mosh pit of the GDP go to GD or the subgroups where you can have more involved and substantive discussions. There is community here on DU, not just the rancor of GDP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Thanks for the welcome
I've actually been visiting this site for years. I was very active in 2004 and 2006. ;) This is a new profile.

I look forward to having great discussions with you all during my 2008 visit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Mean,Hateful = Not voting for Hillary
Wow, you are so DEEP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. your sociopath serial killer icon. now that is deep...in blood nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Another hate filled post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You would know.
See my post above... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. You should know about hate.
All you Obamanation sheep say is how bad Hillary is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. jake tapper seems to have serious issues with hillary
First trying to make her husband look like he was saying something he wasn't, now trying to paint Hillary as a scheming race-baiter.

Maybe Jake should go see a shrink about that little delusional preoccupation of his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't consider anybody who says "there's blood on the ground" my friend at this point.
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 11:35 PM by lvx35
Most mature Democrats have seen "divide and conquer" tactics used time and time again. You have to have been an adolescent in 2000 to miss what Nader did to the left, which got us in this mess. I for one am in no hurry to repeat that mistake by playing up the "bad blood" between Clinton and Obama. Hillary's fondness for Obama, or at least her readiness to work with him, reflects her maturity and makes me like her more as a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. As her national poll #s are falling to parity, she AND her MSM buds will talk about this more
It started right after the debate, the day it was reported Obama was only 4% behind nationally after being down by 20+% a few weeks back.

I bet we hear this a lot more in the next few days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. The Clinton campaign is trying to send this message to Edwards supporters and undecideds:
"You don't have to choose between us. You can choose BOTH of us! (Just make sure you put the 'more experienced' one at the top) We know you like Barack... WE DO TOO! So much so that we'll give him the second-banana spot to appease all of you!"

What they don't get is that the great appeal to Obama among MANY people in this country is that he is a DIFFERENT kind of politician. If he joins Clinton's campaign as an "understudy", he has sold out.

Get over it, Clintonistas.... Either Clinton or Obama will be heading up the ticket... but NEITHER will be the other's VP.

Everything that Obama brings to the table gets washed away if he joins her ticket. The Obama vote *IS* the Anti-Clinton/Bush vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I disagree. We are the Democratic Party.
We make it better in steps. This all or nothing is unrealistic. Listen to the Thom Hartmann Show.

FDR did not run on a Progressive platform, nor did his relative Teddy. But they became Progressive. We the people tell them what do do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Clinton / Obama kills Obama...
but breathes life into Clinton. No one in their right mind would want to be VP to a Clintons white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's exactly right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. That ticket would suck the wind out of the Obama movement.
If Hillary tries to capitalize on it, Obamamania will shrivel up and die.

And IF Obama were to take the VP slot in a Clintons WH... he would do it at the expense of the thing people love about him.

Even Oboama doesnt make me want to vote for Clintons. And if he were to team up with her, that would tell me that I was wrong about him. What a sad day that would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Obama/Clinton kills Obama too...
...all of the Indies and moderate Repugs that he'd bring in would be lost.

As an Obama supporter, I don't want Hillary or Bill anywhere near the ticket. The "fresh start" and "change in Washington" can't occur with a Clinton on the ticket.

Obama needs to think differently. Like Bill did way back when he was the 46-year-old "man from Hope" and teamed up with big Al.

Obama is now running Bill's 1992 race.... and Bill and Hillary don't know how to compete against that. Obama has become the new "man from hope" and Bill and Hillary are the establishment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Youre right.
The Clintons are Toxic to an Obama ticket in any way shape or form. I have to believe he knows it though. He must.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama resents the race-baiting campaigning ? - He began the race card game with MLK "hurt" because
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 11:41 PM by papau
Hillary dared to give a civics lesson and note that getting progress required both a great movement leader and a President to sign into law the change desired.

And Obama's race card has worked well for him - moving a small win in SC into a landslide - and with that momentum closing and possibly leading on 2/5. Meanwhile as he plays victim he has his supporters claim it is Hillary claiming to be the victim. He is a very good politician - and it doesn't hurt to have the media behind you.

"Who benefits" has been an analytic approach beginning with the Greeks and Romans - seems to work well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
35. the Clintons' diminishing MLK's importance was one of the singularly stupid things ever!
It was not race baiting for others to point this out. It was just plain idiotic to say it took a president to get what MLK spoke about done. It was also moronic because it wasn't the President who passed the Civil Rights Act....it was....duh....CONGRESS!

Sometimes I wonder why more intelligent people are not the ones running for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. I suggest you watch this Bill Moyers clip:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. I talked to my dad tonight, a Massachusetts Liberal,
(I'm in Indiana, but am a Mass Liberal too), and he and I agree that they would make a great combination. He is the inspiration, and she is the practician. They compliment each other. I am not going to say who I think should be in front, because I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Won't happen....
Clinton is a drag on Obama in the general election if Obama gets the nomination.

If Clinton gets the nomination, no doubt she will ask Barack. But the appeal of Obama is lost if he's not the top dog on the ticket.

If JFK was merely the VP candidate in 1960 to an "elder, experienced statesman" like Johnson... Nixon would've won in 1960.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. That's an excellent point. I will think about that more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. belittling her legacy?????????? are they serious????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. I Don't Think They Can Work Together
One of the "little" things that worries me about Obama is his obvious personal animosity toward Hillary Clinton. You cannot mistake the contempt in his face when he looks at her. He cannot or will not make an effort to hide it. I have seen photo after photo of him sneering at her or making no effort to conceal a smirk. He has no poker face.

If he cannot keep his personal animus under wraps, how would this serve him in a diplomatic capacity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
29. they are scared to death... Obama has the elusive Big MO!
you heard it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
31. That's like the Backstreet Boys saying they'll have the Beatles open for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
32. It sounds to me like she meant that the next POTUS would be a woman or a black man.
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 12:25 AM by wlucinda
And that's what people were excited about. Breaking the ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDeathadder Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
33. I hope to God
it's a Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket!! I know the drudge report type stories that slam them both, and the bad blood storyline that the media has built heat on. But seeing it mentioned at the debate while they were shoulder to shoulder made me see the light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
34. I said this last night, that talk of them sharing the ticket at the debate
was meant to diminish Obama into the number-two guy--Hillary's hoping people will elect her under the unspoken promise of getting him as VP, when both he and she know he's never going to be her VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
synesthesia Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
37. hrm
Thing is, she's not going to pick Obama as VP when she wins. She is picking Evan Bayh. Obama would be too much of a co-star, and having both a female and an african american might be seen as a strategic risk for a general election for Clinton.

So people are going to be very outraged when this happens. But too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
40. If you actually watched the Tavis Interview
you'd realize the article you posted is complete BS.

Tavis brought up the question, and Clinton did not even attempt to bring up a Clinton/Obama Ticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC