|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
sidwill (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:18 AM Original message |
Did Hillary vote for the IWR because: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neutron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. you keep trying to bury the fact that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neutron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You claim to be for Change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sidwill (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:23 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Another response that avoids the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. AH YES that must be why obamacampers want to take us back to the Reagan era. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sidwill (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Still no response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. I tire of that question--as I can reason with the blind-faith crowd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sidwill (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. What is that supposed to mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 02:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. THIRTY NINE DEAD SOLDIERS THIS MONTH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sidwill (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Hey I have an idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. c: She was Naive as Wolfie suggested? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. I dunno, but 126 dems in the house voted against the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
8. The Clintons shared PNAC's goal of invading Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sidwill (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I think, given Hillary's own answer to the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 02:15 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. No one wants to hear that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
10. Add "C" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sidwill (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:31 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Of course she did know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVjinx (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
14. Sounds like the age-old question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bright Eyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
16. "This Modern World" does it again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
19. I would say both. And that very well disqualifies her as a viable candidate for the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC