And didnt they require a supermajority of 66% or something like that? So isn't it less of a traditional endorsement than a statement as to who the majority of move onmembers are endorsing?
I don't give a crap about it either way, but people who are criticizing this or complaining about it are at times on here definitely misrepresenting the whole thing and making out to be that Eli Pariser took their money and is using it to advertise for Obama or something.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.