Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Obama not campaigning in California?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:45 PM
Original message
Why is Obama not campaigning in California?
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 05:58 PM by senseandsensibility
As far as I can see, he is campaigning very hard in other states and leaving the big enchilada to Hillary. She's basically camped out here. She's getting a lot of positive and FREE air time from the local media, too. And California's media is very expensive.

I did go to his website to see if he had any appearances planned, and couldn't find anything. I think this is a mistake. He has a chance here, but people need to hear him in person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
libertee Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's not been heard of in NYS either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. I thought Oprah was
going to cover CA for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. problem is its the biggest state to blow off and thats what Californians will think

They'll think he's sent his minions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is the math.
The state is pretyy much going to split evenl vecause of the way delegates are allocated...his time is psent better elswhere. The bigger question is wht hasn't Mark Penn figured this out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. That's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. How do you figure that? I think he should still try and get his % point number up.
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 05:49 PM by loveangelc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. As I posted in the thread below...
California was never realistically his. He's doing all he can, but likely it will go to Hillary.

If Hillary wins this race 51-47, Obama will consider it a victory. She'll likely only get 30 more delegates than him. He can win those delegates and more back in his small state strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. IMO, 60-40% delegate split is a victory for Obama. Realistically, since early ballots
and the "Spielberg/Reiner" crowd (monied stars who like supporting status quo).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I don't think Hillary will win the state by 20 points
Nothing in recent polls would indicate a 20 point win for Hillary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. No, not the last poll I saw anyway
Does anyone have a link to the most recent CA poll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. despite the ~early voting~ ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Yes
This race will be won or lost on Tuesday, not by early voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. But everyone is saying that half the votes have been cast....which I would think is overwhelmingly
for her..?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. That's wrong
Half the votes have not already been cast.

Only 22% of the potential voters have already voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Everyone is saying half the votes have been cast though.
22% overall or on the Democratic side??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:56 PM
Original message
You get Delegates based on how you do in a Congressional District
if bothe candidates get over 40% they split the delegate evenly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. too many states, too little time, that was always his big problem

He's having to go to the very vulnerable states to try and pick up pace. I'm not sure theres anything he can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lowering expectations? Didn't Oprah do a gig for him?
He's dumping a shitload of money into Massachusetts--OBSCENE amounts of advertising. I think he's worried about the Kennedy-Kerry-Patrick Holy Trinity's ability to sway their electorate???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I don't see Mass going for Obama whatsoever

I think it will be a Hillary blowout there. If it is, its the big embarrassment for him, Kennedy and Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. How is it an embarrassment when the media has been saying its safely in the Clinton column?
I dont think anyone really expected it to be a swing state at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. well as far as i can see many polls still put her in the 50's there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. well thats why most people think its not contested.
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 06:04 PM by loveangelc
i didnt know it was automatic that because a senator from your state endorses someone, they are automatically expected to win the state. thats news to me. It's not an embarrassment or a shock if Clinton wins..its a HUGE embarrassment if Clinton loses or wins by a smaller amount than expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. It tarnishes the reputations of the Senators who endorsed him, suggesting that
their constituents don't have much regard for their opinion, or the opinion of the Governor, either. IF Clinton prevails, that is.

Like I said, he's spending/wasting? a lot of ad money here. If it's not competitive, why bother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. How the hell does it tarnish their reputations? You are funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
51. You seem to have a curious concept of what an endorsement involves.
The idea behind it is that supporters of the endorser will shift their allegiance to the endorsee, based on their opinion of the endorser.

It's not an academic exercise--it is meant to assist in the persuasion process to earn the endorsee more support.

You're the "funny" one in this exchange, not me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #51
65. But who really thinks a solidly Clinton state will go Obama because of 2 senator endorsements?
Every news station has said that MA is definitely in the Clinton column. If its even close, that's a huge embarrassment for her, not for the senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. I love all of this "If it's even close, it's a win" bullshit.
It's actually NOT. If it's close, it's still called SECOND PLACE.

The art of lowering expectations is in full swing, though!

When the governor and the entire Senate delegation isn't in synch with their constituency, that's problematic--for the politicians. They'll need to "get correct" and start listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. And Deval, our gov and one of his early endorsers, if that's the way it plays out.
Time will tell. If he can't get close, it will be a MASSIVE waste of dough. BIG ad buy in a "not cheap" market.

I voted for all of those guys (the Senators many times over) and their endorsement leaves me cold. It doesn't sway me in the slightest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tomorrow theres a big rally planned in LA
With Michelle, Caroline Kennedy, and Oprah.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. He thinks he can do well enought to take delegates away from her...and
Hes sending Oprah, Caroline Kennedy, and Michelle tomorrow to LA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The Closers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertee Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Oprah doesn't surprise me..Caroline I expected more of..don't know why..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm sure he has surrogates there working hard. It's tough to decide
where to be, I imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yes, there's a current thread in GDP about Kerry
appearing in SF for him this morning. I still think Obama needs to BE here. Hillary is getting a lot of positive press from the local news stations the last few nights. She's been interviewed by the local news anchors, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I honestly think California is not going to be as close as you think

Those early ballots are going to be a lethal knife i think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Only 22% are early ballots
And that is divided among the GOP and the Democrats.

So at best, these early ballots will comprise only 11-15% of the vote.

Not nearly enough to decide the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. If 22% are early ballots for both parties, they are also 20-22% or so of the
Democratic vote, it would stand to reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. That is divided up between both parties.
22% of the vote for both races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. I was commenting on your 11-15% number.
Where does that come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
58. according to yahoo

Consider the case of California: In the "Super Tuesday" state with the largest number of delegates at stake, it is estimated now that as many as half the votes will end up having been cast prior to February 5. That's more than 2.3 million votes, some of which were cast around the time of the New Hampshire primary.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080202/cm_thenation/45279382
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
71. Pretty sure Zynx is right. In fact it is probably a lot more than 22% Dem.
Let's say there are 100 total voters, 50 Dems and 50 Republicans. 22% of all the voters pre-vote. So that's 22.

Assume half of the 22 were Dem and half were GOP. Then that's 11 Dems. 11 Dems out of 50 is 22%.

So that is 22% Dems if Dems and Republicans are actually evenly represented in the total number of voters. But that is not true in CA. In reality, there are a lot more Dems, of course in CA. And also, Dems are tending to vote at historically high levels vs. Republicans.

So the percentage of Dem votes already in in CA would be significantly higher than 22%. (I don't know that 22% base voter figure is right, though. Just getting it from this discussion.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
59. Not to mention everyone seems to ignore the Indie Factor...
who's to say ALL of the early Dem ballots came FROM Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. its been touted most of the earlies backed Clinton with about 60% of them apparently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tomorrow with Oprah, Kennedy etc......?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. He's sending Kerry, Ted and Carolina Kennedy and Oprah there
But as somebody said, it's the math.

There are 370 delegates at stake here.

If Hillary wins 200 of those delegates, and Obama wins 170, it really doesn't matter much. Obama can win most of the small states and get that difference in delegates back using his small state strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
42. Do the polls show him ahead in
those small states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Only 2 days campaigning left because Tuesday is buggered for stumping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
53. Superbowl Sunday is kinda hosed, really. I'm not a fanatic for football,
but I'm off to a Superbowl party with the family, myself. Of course, it IS the PATS, so maybe I'm being a bit provincial.

Though I have to admit, in the last ten years or so, I've attended at least five gatherings of that nature, and not even paid attention to the game, at times...they're great social occasions...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. So campaigning on Sunday is screwed too for Superbowl,that leaves Monday,lol no time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. I think he has a big rally planned tomorrow, with Caroline Kennedy and Oprah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. but as California primary votes are going to be into the millions

You'd think he's be in too see it out, California can be very flippant for voting. If Clinton has racked up a 1/2 million or more lead from early ballots, there will be problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. I agree. Someone said he had a good ground game in place in California
Maybe he's counting on it? And his super bowl ad buy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. might backfire, i go nuts if political ads come in the middle during superbowl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
45. He does have people on the ground
There are groups stumping for him and calling for him, even in the small towns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. I dunno...Why is Hillary still there trying to lock it down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. The bigger the percentage difference at the end, the more pressure on Obama to fall.

If she take New York wide and Cali wide and NJ and others, then the pressure will be on to quit, i think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. 'Cause it's not such a
sure thing, after all?:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. He thinks he has us in his hip pocket?
I dunno, maybe he's campaigning where he thinks he has a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
61. WTF? Clinton can afford to camp out in Cali
because she's leading in the majority of the states. Obama doesn't have that luxury. He can't afford to stay in CA for 3 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. It must be nice to have all those corporate donations. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. He is and Obama is going to do very well in California.
I think it's more telling Clinton has pretty much camped out there. Neither candidate has to win California, since it's not a winner take all primary. If Obama picks up a big delegate count and wins these other states he's doing well in, he'll be declared the winner Tuesday. And even then, he still stands a really good shot at taking California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. He was in LA yesterday focusing on the Latino vote, an important effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. I agree
But Hillary is all over the northern part of the state, and she's getting a lot more attention. She's not just flying in for quick events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. he did an outreach at a latino college on Thursday, only AA voters turned up
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 07:01 PM by sunonmars
http://www.mercurynews.com/politics/ci_8137257?nclick_check=1

He does have problems with these voters i think

"When I talk to my friends, we all say we're going to vote for her," said Sal Arciga, a 25-year-old phone operator having a carne asada burrito a table away from where the senator from New York sat.

What does he think about Barack Obama, running against Clinton for the Democratic nomination?

"O-who?" he asked, putting his burrito down, thinking about it. "I think he needs to come and eat here."

And that's essentially what Obama will have to do if he expects to break the Clinton stronghold on the huge and influential Latino vote here in California. He's got five days to do it, and he made an dramatic attempt Thursday with a rally at a Los Angeles trade college just hours before the final Democratic debate before Tuesday's primary. The event was billed as an outreach to Latino voters.

The only glitch? Most of the crowd was black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #55
63. Latino caucusgoers and primary voters in Nevada and Florida voted almost 3-to-1 for Clinton.. Link:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/local/stories/DN-olivera_02met.ART.North.Edition1.4572321.html

Quote:
Latino caucusgoers and primary voters in Nevada and Florida voted almost 3-to-1 for Mrs. Clinton. A similar pattern is expected to emerge Tuesday, when 22 states hold Democratic primaries or caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
50. Better idea: why doesn't Obama just use his powers of teleportation?
I'm beginning to think that everyone here has collectively lost her and his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
52. Obama spent a couple of days in CA earlier this week
He was at several big events over that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
62. just heard from some callbankers for Clinton in California, the debate swinging the undecided to her
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 07:16 PM by sunonmars
They said Upstate California is swinging heavily to Hillary.

Debate mentioned as reason for final decision.

Also noone is polling Asian americans but staff noticing them trending Hillary bigtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
64. He is
tomorrow.

God, why don't people do the most basic bit of research before asking dumbass questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Thank you for clarifying, Cali could score big for Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
69. My theory is that they don't really care about the answers. They just want to
push their agenda forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
70. Obama is here tomorrow
and let me tell you: I've been phonebanking for Sen Obama and volunteering at events and his organization in the LA area is unlike anything I've ever seen (I also know they are incredibly organized in OC, which has the 2nd highest number of Democratic voters in CA behind LA County). Where I phonebank, we have regular gringos like me, Spanish- and Korean-speaking Omama spporters, etc. who are calling people and getting out the vote. If you knew how many people will be taken to the polls on Tuesday, you'd be amazed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC