Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary will garnish wages? That's a low blow right from the Bush playbook

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:01 AM
Original message
Hillary will garnish wages? That's a low blow right from the Bush playbook
Evidently someone is taking something and doing the switcharoo and is trying to bash her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. what are you referring to?
where did you see this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. She said it on TV this morning. I heard her.
As a healthcare worker, I disagree strongly with this tactic. It's not the answer to our healthcare dilemma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Since I didn't see the interview I would think
She didn't say she was going to garnish wages but whatever she said I'm sure it is twisted by media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. She said that wage garnishment was an option.
I heard it with my own ears on 'This Week' on ABC this morning. Check out the transcript when it appears on the ABC website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. He doesn't care that she said it. Four people here have told him that she
said it this morning on "This Week" and, despite the fact that it was HER sitting there saying it, he's blaming "the media." Brilliant, just brilliant.

But, see, the way Hillary operates, she'll say something different later today or tomorrow and they will quote that and praise her to no end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. This wasn't a reporter twisting her words; she said it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. You didn't see the interview, but you're sure HRC didn't say what others
heard her say. It's the media and others twisting her words. :tinfoilhat: time for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugdude Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. She fucking SAID IT HERSELF
OMG, so even you find it unbelievable that a candidate would be so careless as to garnish wages?

Get on the Obama train then, welcome to have you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abacus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
37. On of the other "options"
espoused by one of her campaign surrogates was to take away the standard income tax deductible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bullshit. She said that's an option.
She said it on Stephanolpoloupoupolous's show this morning.

"Will you garnish wages?"

"George, there will be an enforcement mechanism, whether it's that or something else."

I just heard it five minutes ago. Check the transcript when it comes out if you don't believe me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. "An enforcement mechanism"? Oh, man; I do NOT like the sound fo that.
What's her problem? Some people are simply TOO POOR to buy health insurance---and YET not Medicaid-eligible.

She has health-care ARSE-BACKWARDS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. If she says it's an option, that means she's open to the idea.
That's enough for me. I don't want any candidate who is open to that idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. George Stephanopoulus nailed her
After she hemmed and hawed, she finally admitted that she would "automatically enroll" people. What does that mean?

Then he continued to press her for an answer and she refused to state what her enforcement method will be. She did mention "automatic enrollment" and "going after your wages". Before she bashed Obama some more for "distorting my positions."

Yet another of her non-answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. George did a great job exposing her usual blah blah blah talking point robotalk
She never actually answered his simple question THREE TIMES.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugdude Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hillarys plans are so ludicrous that even her supporters dont believe it comes from her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, we just know how the Obama media twists things
That's what I know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. And they will STILL vote for her. Amazing. She could stand in their
living room and tell them something and they'd still deny she said it. Maybe that's a good move, since she says different things to different audiences on different days. She's a shameless liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Is that like Obama's present vote
8 times on CHOICE when he states he's for women's choice? Is that like his gun control policy but states everyone needs a gun in front of a audience of hunters? He's the liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. This lie about Obama's choice record has been debunked repeatedly
Yet Clinton supporters still bring it up, which may say something about their ability to comprehend basic explanations.

The lie worked on NH voters but no one's buying it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. You'll have to ask an Obama supporter.
But I do find it funny that now that you've been called on your bullshit Hillary talking points you are reduced to changing the topic.

Typical Hillary supporter -- don't think, just vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. She never answered the question about garnishing wages (three times asked)
This is going to be BIG news.

If I were in the Hillaryworld campaign, expect some MAJOR incoming...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Health Care is an area where details hurt Clinton
It reminds people of how she handled it the first time--not a pleasant memory. Indeed, she ought to sound as if she intends to be more collaborative, even if she won't be in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes, nobody will forget how "collaborative" Hillary can be on healthcare.
She has the 1994 record to prove that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugdude Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. True. She has no idea on how to manage healthcare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. it's par for the course. obamba does it himself, as well as his supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. The thing about it is
She didn't say she was garnishing wages. There is a difference from that to "what's on the table".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. yes, but they have been given orders from the all important that hillary will fine and garnish wages
doesn't matter if it's true or not. just say it.

They cannot help themselves they have no other answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
24. Her supporters conveniently forget she's in bed with insurance and pharma cos.
They will be the biggest benefactors of any mandated plan she puts forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonicmedusa Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
27. People! She completely avoided this topic in the LA debate
What does that tell you???? Of course she did not say it, people would have booed her off the stage! What kind of logic is it that if someone cannot afford health insurance, that the answer is to garnish their wages? See for yourself, she completely avoided how she was going to enforce mandatory healthcare:

OBAMA: Now, under any mandate, you are going to have problems with people who don't end up having health coverage. Massachusetts right now embarked on an experiment where they mandated coverage. And, by the way, I want to congratulate Governor Schwarzenegger and the speaker and others who have been trying to do this in California, but I know that those who have looked at it understand, you can mandate it, but there's still going to be people who can't afford it. And if they cannot afford it, then the question is, what are you going to do about it? Are you going to fine them? Are you going to garnish their wages? You know, those are questions that Senator Clinton has not answered with respect to her plan, but I think we can anticipate that there would also be people potentially who are not covered and are actually hurt if they have a mandate imposed on them.

BLITZER: All right. Senator Clinton, this is a substantive difference on health care between the two of you. Go ahead and respond.

CLINTON: Well, let me start by saying that this is the passionate cause of my public service. I started trying to expand health care many years ago, first to children, then to rural areas in Arkansas, and obviously tackled it during my husband's administration. And the reason why I have designed a plan that, number one, tells people, if you have health insurance and you are happy with it, nothing changes, is because we want to maximize choice for people. So, if you are satisfied, you're not one of the people who will necessarily, at this time, take advantage of what I'm offering. But if you are uninsured or underinsured, we will open the congressional health plan to you. And contrary to... (APPLAUSE) Contrary to the description that Barack just gave, we actually will make it affordable for everyone, because my plan lowers costs aggressively, which is important for us all; improves quality for everyone, which is essential. And the way it covers all of those who wish to participate in the congressional plan is that it will provide subsidies, and it will also cap premiums, something that is really important, because we want to make sure that it is affordable for all. So, when you draw the distinction that, "Well, it's not affordable, therefore people will have to be made to get it," well, the fact is, it has been designed to be affordable with health care tax credits. And it's also important to recognize that right now, there are people who could afford health care, and they are not all young, they're people who just don't feel they have to accept that responsibility. There are many states which give families the option of keeping children up until 25 on their policies, but their rates of uninsurance are still very high. We cannot get to universal health care, which I believe is both a core Democratic value and imperative for our country, if we don't do one of three things. Either you can have a single payer system, or -- which, I know, a lot of people favor, but for many reasons, is difficult to achieve. Or, you can mandate employers. Well, that's also very controversial. Or, you can do what I am proposing, which is to have shared responsibility. Now, in Barack's plan, he very clearly says he will mandate that parents get health insurance for their children. So it's not that he is against mandatory provisions, it's that he doesn't think it would be politically acceptable to require that for everyone. I just disagree with that. I think we as Democrats have to be willing to fight for universal health care. (APPLAUSE) And what I've concluded, when I was looking at this -- because I got the same kind of advice, which was, it's controversial, you'll run into all of this buzz saw, and I said, been there, done that. But if you don't start by saying, you're going to achieve universal health care, you will be nibbled to death. And I think it's imperative that, as we move forward in this debate and into the campaign, that we recognize what both John Edwards and I did, that you have to bite this bullet. You have to say, yes, we are going to try to get universal health care. What I have designed makes it affordable, provides premium caps so it's never
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. That's pretty much what she said to Stephanopoulus.
So he asked her 2 more times how the mandates would work. She finally admitted there'd might go after your wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugdude Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. She WILL go after your wages.
More money for her employers (the insurance companies).

Mandating healthcare is a disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. No she didn't,
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 10:36 AM by seasonedblue
she said that there were a variety of options, but she stressed the fact that with her plan that included things like subsidies and tax credits etc., it would never come to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugdude Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Insurance companies are funding her campaign. She is the only candidate who takes PAC money and
corporate lobbyist money.

Ofcourse she has their interests in heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. No Hillary isn't
Look up Obama's contributors. If you haven't then I believe your uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugdude Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Obama takes no PAC money or federal corporate lobbyist money
I will pay you $1000 if you can PROVE to me that he does.

$1000. Your candidate, on the other hand, has basically NO small donations from the people, she is funded by corporate organisations.

90% of Obamas money comes from small donors, $25 or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
31. that is what we have now. I pay a portion of my health insurance
what the hell are you guys blowing up now? You are like a bunch of kids with fireworks and matches.

Of course we have to contribute to our own health insurance. Did anyone think we wouldn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonicmedusa Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. The difference is, you pay that voluntarily
If you did not like the amount your empolyer charges for premiums, you can opt out. Hillary's is mandatory. If you can't afford that chunk out of your paycheck? Tough shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. It is affordable according to need and income
You guys are looking for things to distort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
35. I don't think we'll ever reach the point
where people will accept single payer health care if these kind of scare tactics work so well against something as simple mandates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. When the Stephanopolus transcript are posted
There will be a lot of people with egg on there face. They will have to retract there statement about what Hillary actually said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC