Today's RW throw away talking point,"garnishing wages"

[DainBramaged]

Being used a lot today on DU regarding Hillary's appearance on This Week on ABC.

DON'T BE FOOLED BY SUBSTTUTES, only "garnishing wages" is the accepted talking point today.


That is all.

:sarcasm:

[UALRBSofL]

1. Totally agree

But people hear what they want to hear.

[DainBramaged]

2. Well, it's read what they want to read too

But I think I need to garnish some pancakes, I'm hungry.

[neutron]

33. The worst Scandel is in today's NYT

Obama LIED to the Iowa voters, claiming he passed legislation
that did not pass.
He took hundreds of thousands of dollars from Nuclear interests then
worked AGAINST the interest of his contituents.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/us/politics/03exelon....

[Kahuna]

3. How is it a RW talking point if it just happened a couple of hours ago?

'Splain please.

[ugdude]

6. He wont explain

In his eyes, Hillary can do no wrong

[DainBramaged]

11. you think these shows are live??

Au contraire my Cheri

[sniffa]

4. SUBSTTUTES is a RW meme

:rofl:

[Occam Bandage]

5. So, er...what is the LW-approved term for that? Here I thought it was the legal terminology.

[DainBramaged]

13. We don't have talking points, we are led by sheep

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :patriot:

[Occam Bandage]

16. No, seriously. How would you refer to garnishment? What's the non-"talking point" term?

[DainBramaged]

19. I'l play

Did Hillary say garnish wages??? Who said "garnish wages"?Which thread here used it first? And since when does a President make laws?Isn't the job of the Office of the resident (this illegal one notwithstanding) make policy that affects millions of Americans, IE, "garnish wages"?

[Occam Bandage]

21. How else would you propose a mandate be enforced? Again, serious here.

Wouldn't the logical means of enforcing a mandate be to, in cases of noncompliance, to garnish wages to forcibly ensure coverage? The alternative would be increasingly-draconian fines, which would of course be even worse.

[DainBramaged]

23. I don't have to propose shit, I'm not in politics or Congress

Nice try. But keep pushing that talking point, I will be impressed if it lasts through, say oh Tuesday.

Oh, and you avoided answering my quesions, so we're done. Time to eat my pancakes.

[Occam Bandage]

24. It's not a talking point. It's what her mandate entails.

If you're too stupid to understand domestic policy, stop trying to discuss it.

[DainBramaged]

25. Too stupid? you're done

Another red X for posterity. I despise Reich wingers who think they can come here and test their bullshit on DU. And since today is "Hillary's health care mandate" talking point for you, I think my pancakes are more important that your regurgitated bullshit.

Good luck in the general election, Grandpa won't get elected, but one of OUR candidates will.

[Occam Bandage]

26. Is it your position that Hillary Clinton's health care plan does not include a mandate?

Or is it your position that a mandate would not be enforced by wage garnishment?

[hiaasenrocks]

39. He does not even understand the issue. He has proved that time and again

throughout this thread and when I posted a link to Hillary's own words this morning, he refused to answer substantively and instead started talking about pancakes.

This guy is a real DU treasure.

[MoonRiver]

7. Just part of the daily DU anti-Hillary talking point spamming.

:puke:

[DainBramaged]

9. yup, and the flies will be drawn to the honey till it's vinegar

Amazing how they'll try expand on it within this very thread!:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[Occam Bandage]

17. ...

[mrreowwr_kittty]

8. It's karma biting y'all in the ass for the Handshake Snub bullshit. nt

[DainBramaged]

10. (sigh) Oh yeah, forgot about THAT talking point they tried

I use Purell before I shake anyone's hand

[BootinUp]

12. I'm for garnishing Healthcare! nt

[PassingFair]

14. We'd BETTER pay attention. If she wins the nomination...

we're all going to have to defend this stuff.

Door to door.

Ugh.

[DainBramaged]

15. What stuff??? A Reich wing talking point? Nope won't be a problem.

Not i said the old fart.

[PassingFair]

18. ALL of it.

I can hear my spiel now.

"I'm not her biggest fan either, BUT....."

I am NOT looking forward to canvassing if
she gets the nod.

Too many people dislike her for too many
reasons.

Right AND left AND down the middle.

[DainBramaged]

20. Then don't go

I've had lots of doors slammed in my face over the years. At least you can check off which houses should be reported to Homeland Security and get your revenge.

:patriot: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[PassingFair]

22. I will go, just like I went for Kerry.

Even though he was not the best candidate.

I will AGAIN make excuses.

Because the alternative will be worse.

Nothing :rofl: about it.

[HeraldSquare212]

27. I know it's a RW talking point, because she used it this morning! nt

[DainBramaged]

28. Really, got the transcript handy??

You really hate her, don't you?admitting that would be goodfor your soul. O8)

[stevietheman]

31. She said it! It will be in the ABC transcript once it's posted.

Stop ignoring people who tell the truth!

[HeraldSquare212]

40. No, but here's an AP article covering the show.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080203/ap_on_el_pr/campaign_rdp_30

[hiaasenrocks]

42. It won't matter. The OP has already proved that he is not interested in facts.

[hiaasenrocks]

29. The OP doesn't CARE if Hillary said it.

That much is obvious.

Those of us who saw the show this morning know she said it. When we posted it, we were accused of using RW talking points. When the AP reported it, some were saying the AP was using RW talking points. I guess when the full transcript is available, the same people will say the transcript was doctored by the RW.

You see, Hillary isn't responsible for anything she says!

Don't expect her supporters to do any actual thinking. That's not fair. :(

[DainBramaged]

32. So you think I support Hillary??

Your knowledge of my support is only as detailed as the last post you read. But typical.

And the hatred for Hillary is far more hurtful to DU than anything you could say to me.

[stevietheman]

34. Your ignoring of me over what Hillary said proves you're a Hillbot. n/t

n/t

[hiaasenrocks]

38. He's proving that his play-on-words handle is true.

I don't often add people to my ignore list, but this guy's simply a troll.

[hiaasenrocks]

35. Well, you're going to extremely ridiculous lengths to defend her

against her own words. If you don't support her, you should. The Clintons' campaign can use all the liars they can get.

But back to the topic. What do you think she meant by "going after people's wages"?

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8UIUP3O0&show_article=1

Do you have anything of substance to add, or are you stuck in the loop of accusing other people of using RW talking points even though we are using her own words?

[DainBramaged]

36. Why bother answering to you? Your mind is made up. Ask someone else who cares

These pancakes are so good. you missed out.:smoke:

[hiaasenrocks]

37. Just what I thought.

When confronted with her own words, you have nothing more to say. Brilliant, just brilliant.

Well, this was fun. On to other threads. Have a great day! :hi:

[stevietheman]

30. OK, if you feel that ignoring what Hillary actually said will be helpful.

:eyes:

[hiaasenrocks]

41. The OP wishes to keep his head in the sand.

Typical of Hillary voters.

Just look a few posts above this and you'll see that he refused to discuss Hillary's own words.

We're not exactly dealing with a genius here.

[KaptBunnyPants]

43. If people want universal healthcare, we will all have to pay for it.

That's the whole point. This isn't magical fairy healthcare. Not liking Hillary isn't an excuse for demonizing universal healthcare. Unless people really are happy with the status quo.