Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How the First Clinton "Cleaned up after Bush"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 11:28 AM
Original message
How the First Clinton "Cleaned up after Bush"
As the 1992 presidential race reached its final days, Bill Clinton promised that, if elected, he would appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate allegations by congressional Democrats that the U.S. government had secretly been aiding the Iraqi weapons buildup-and perhaps even its nuclear weapons effort-and then engaging in a cover-up to hide its handiwork. Repeatedly challenging President Bush for the Republican "tilt" toward Iraq in the 1980's, Clinton vowed that no political considerations would cloud the investigation. The Clinton team took the issue so seriously that vice-presidential candidate Al Gore, in a landmark speech, called the Iraq scandal "worse than Watergate."


Nearly four years and several grand juries later, however, the Clinton administration has swept its "Iraqgate" investigation under the rug. The Final Report, issued by attorney general Janet Reno on January 17, 995, and written by Reno deputy John Hogan, amounts to little more than a whitewash of the entire affair. In every case it examined, the report concluded there had been no violation of law. And in a classified addendum, subsequently rendered public, the intelligence community and the executive branch were exonerated of having "illegally armed Iraq," despite extensive evidence of intelligence community involvement unearthed by the Gonzalez investigation and the U.S. Customs Service

http://www.gulfweb.org/doc_show.cfm?ID=527


Make no mistake, When Hillary says "clean up" ...she doesn't mean "hold accountable"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. I tho't it was a stupid comment for her to make just from the standpoint
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 11:32 AM by poli speak
that she's still talking about the past, not the future. Also, people are sick of one-liners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. But Obama wants to "work closely with them"....
so I guess we can assume that he won't be doing any digging either, right? :shrug:

It's pretty easy throwing stones at the Clintons. They've actually DONE something, for good or bad, and aren't trying to sneak in the back door on a promise of "hope". Obama's career as a politician is virtually a tabula rasa. Yeah, he's the "feel good" candidate, the guy every moon-eyed dreamer can throw their support behind, but he hasn't had the experience, again, for good or bad, to base any logical support decision upon.

I'm sure you'll attack this with multiple "links" (if it's one thing Obama supporters have, it's links ;) ) but the Clintons are a big target because they've actually been out there DOING things, not just "hoping" to do them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. they have done both good and bad
frankly I'm willing to give someone else a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think Bill Clinton will go down as the greatest President this country has ever had, and
HRC will go down as the most effective, knowledgeable and accomplished Senator in our nation's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep, it's "All in The BUSH-CLINTON Family Secrets file" - cue the music of "The Godfather"
:scared: :thumbsdown: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Also, now we need some to clean up after her and a Bush going to war in Iraq
to the tune of billions of dollars, with the blank check she helped write. Fuck her; I'm sick of the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Grear Shot George!! We're really
'cleaning up'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC