Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton more equipped to take on the repugs.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
elixir2 Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:17 PM
Original message
Clinton more equipped to take on the repugs.
Obama hasn't been battle tested. The republicans will find many issues to kill him on, Hillary's been through this already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Delegates Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Repubs might find many small issues on Obama
But all they need to do with Hillary is play the wage garnishment clip and watch her fade away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he beats Clinton, he will have been plenty battle tested
ny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. If Clinton machine is so tough, why didn't they even try battling RoveBush the last 7yrs?
Their machine has been in place for over a decade and they can barely take on Obama who has stitched together a team in a little over a year.

Of course, the only practice TeamClinton has had the last 7 years has been their support for Bush against other Dems who came forward to oppose him.

Like Bill defending Bush during his 3wk summer2004 book tour:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/06/19/clinton.iraq/


Or when they joined Bush's smears against Kerry:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk1k0nUWEQg

Or when they supported Scooter Libby. And Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir2 Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. As far as I know, the last seven years weren't on Clintons' watch. Why should they need to take
them out?

What is it Stupid Crazy Addled Baseless Slurs night on DU? The Clintons' not only oppose Bush but support other efforts to undo his horrendous actions!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Clinton's been head of the Dem party as the last president since he left office.
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 10:02 PM by blm
Hillary was a Dem senator who sat on her hands while her MACHINE stayed quiet when any other Dem was under attack for opposing Bush.

The only addle-brained here are those who think it was OK for the Clinton machine, paid for by MANY OF US DEMS over the last 15 years, to sit back while RoveBush attacked relentlessly and TeamClinton only saw a fit to come out when BUSH NEEDED DEFENDING from the left in 2004. Or when Scooter Libby needed defending from the left. Or when Lieberman needed defending from the left.

Don't even TRY to snow us with EXCUSES why Clintons couldn't help return fire when so many Dem laemakers, Dem issues, and even our Dem nominee were under constant attack.

I paid into that machine over the years for it to operate against GOPs and Bushes.

Instead they were working to UNDERMINE Dems in their effort to protect Hillary2008 by protecting Bush.

And some people DID NOTICE in April2004:
http://www.depauw.edu/news/index.asp?id=13354

And on election night:

http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/oct/07/did_carville_tip_bush_off_to_kerry_strategy_woodward

And in 2006:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk1k0nUWEQg

Don't even TRY your lame excuses for the Bush protecting Clintons. Not with those of us who KNOW better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not after today's big gaffe. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErnestoG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because she is so close to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obama is here on the eve of Super Tuesday in a position to possibly wrest
away the nomination from someone who, with her husband, has been building and oiling a mighty political machine for 30 years. I'll take my chances on the kid, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC