|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:01 AM Original message |
Wow. So an actual Gore endorsement of Obama may be in the works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
1. Oooh, quoting "The Prowler!" on "The American Spectator" yet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Hey man. It's out there. I'll bring it up. I'm not going to filter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. So if you're naive enough for passing off rumor and speculation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:14 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Not at all. All of these endorsements are rumors and speculation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Does that give you any hints what we're dealing with here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
2. Former aid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. If you read it closely, you'll see that it doesn't say who gave the info... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:19 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Right, there's no actual evidence suggesting anything here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:24 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:06 AM Response to Original message |
4. I'm really sick and tired of the Clintons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:12 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It says, "Clinton loyalists", NOT the Clintons. There is a difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:18 AM Response to Reply #4 |
16. They ARE the Party Leaders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #16 |
38. I agree that the Clintons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. Gore has his work cut out for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
8. Gore won't endorse Obama nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
11. Not the Prowler, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:17 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Stand by for The National Review's take. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:24 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. See Drudge Report link below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:26 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Absolutely. I like to know what they're up to and how they're spinning things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:32 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. ...So you can use that same exact right wing spin against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:35 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Hey look, you repeated your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:18 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Well, kos reported that Richardson endorsement tonight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
37. You just quote anyone you want to quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
13. Could you provide a link to Druge too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Absolutely. Here you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:29 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. We're fundies because we don't read right wing rags? OK fine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:31 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Not what I said at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. You're full of baloney, you really are. Screw your right wing papers, I am not "closed minded" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:37 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. No. But if you think that they are beneath reading and that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:39 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Oh, so you DON'T believe the article you cited here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Ahh, I knew that you would come back with that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:32 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Right and they want to see how the right is "spinning things" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:34 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Oh now that is rich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
22. He better not. Hillary will scratch his eyes out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ursi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
24. Endorsing before Tuesday will get him a hell of alot more attention then after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomreedtoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
31. IF he performs well on Super Tuesday. Hmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:40 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Please note... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ForRusty (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
35. Hmmm... Seems to leave open the opportunity to endorse Hillary if she does well though. /shrug. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
39. Grasping at straws, gasping for air. Obama/Camelot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 03:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC