Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A theory on polls: Poll/Information lag

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 07:44 AM
Original message
A theory on polls: Poll/Information lag
We all watch polls looking for instantaneous reactions to whatever's in the latest news cycles. People who are highly informed that are polled will reflect the latest developments, but that doesn't constitute most people.

Think about an issue you don't pay attention to, but that is in the news. When does it finally dawn on you what's going on? Usually takes days, maybe a week and eventually you are clued in. Here and there, 10 seconds of information about Britney Spears and within two weeks, you will have assembled the basic facts of what's going on even without paying attention. In politics that is how it is for a large segment of voters.

Thus, the cry in New Hampshire may not have swung things towards Hillary after all. Bill Clinton's campaigning in Nevada was not markedly different than in South Carolina, however, it didn't get widespread exposure and didn't sink in until South Carolina. Hillary won Nevada, I would argue in part because voters were not uniformly informed about the change in tactics. I'm not judging those tactics here, except to say that they backfired (fairly or not).

Remember Swift Boating? Did Kerry's numbers drop right away? No, it takes time for it to work.

Sometimes in the instant information environment we are in, we forget that most people are just now reacting to news that was available a week or two ago.

Poll lag folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is no lag for Obama
Because there is nearly real criticism of Obama. There is nothing to react to, so all movement will be up, up, up.

This should scare Obama. If he is being annointed as our new Messiah, that would be bad. But if this is just the calm before the storm, all this gloating is going to turn into paranoia and despair.

I strongly suspect that the press is gaming the primaries to sell ads. I am certain that the nature of the primary will be changed radically on Wednesday morning. And it may not be pleasant for Team-O.

Of course, I am a partisan and a Hillary-bot and a cynic and a destroyer of Hope. But the wonk in me wants to raise the shark attack warnings. I know what the response will be.

Today, Mr. Rofl; later, the proverbial bunker in Idaho.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC