Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Current delegate count: Clinton 259; Obama 180. We're still in the lead. Keep it up Hillary!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:53 AM
Original message
Current delegate count: Clinton 259; Obama 180. We're still in the lead. Keep it up Hillary!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. OK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The United States is not in Iraq! They are not headed towards Bagdad! hahahahahahahaha

* I do wish he was telling the truth about that though. We wouldn't be in this mess that we are in right now..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. **Paging Photoshop Wizards**
Somebody with graphic talents needs to morph Baghdad Bob into some Team Hillary spokesperson. Unless they actually hired the real Baghdad Bob. And after hiring Mark Penn, that really wouldn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Baghdad Bob is working for the Clinton campaign mgr?
What's that guy's name that running the Clinton Campaign?

Oh yeah, FAT BASTARD!

"I eat ba-bies!!"
--- Mark Penn in Austin Powers, International Man of Mystery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. I am still the president of Iraq!
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. We Can Do It!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Actually, you're wrong. that's old
Obama now has over 200 delegates,dear. You're not counting all the SDs he accrued in the last 2 weeks or so. And don't forget, SDs are not fixed in stone. Only delegates won in the primary process are. Why the propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Actually dear this is the official count so far (as official goes that is).
Clinton 232

Obama 158

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. But it's so not fair to do a direct quote from CNN when it doesn't favor Obama.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. Wrong Delegates from primaries are the only ones that can't change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Oh, Cali, dear, here's the link. I guess you haven't had your coffee yet. Good Mornin' sweetheart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. That only factoring in superdelegates ....
Obama is ahead in elected delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. As far as I know, superdelegates count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Super delegates don't count until they vote
because they can switch up until the last minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. They are "soft" counts, they can change at anytime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. She is only leading because of super delegates.
If Obama can win more primaries and caucuses, many super delegates might change their allegiance to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Though winning is certainly an important variable...
I believe that the polls showing Obama beating McCain will have influence. And one needs to ask themselves...Would you want to be downticket with Obama at the top or downticket with Clinton at the top?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. That would make it interesting. If Obama hits the convention with more elected
and that's still an IF at this point, I wouldn't want to be a super delegate, most of whom are committed to Hillary at this point.

These delegates would have many considerations among them who they thought would do best in the GE and whom they felt most loyal to. For them to select the candidate with fewer elected delegates would, it seems to me, make unifying the party more difficult, though it would be fun to watch the debate between those in favor of democracy with a small "d" and those extolling the "wisdom" of party insiders. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. I dont think you are right... Those are not the sworn delegates... Including Super Delegates
is a bit like saying your almost pregnant. You can not explain how they count...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Welcome aboard the Titanic. This is your captain speaking. Hillary is the frontrunner."
"Don't worry about recent polls. Obama is way behind. There is no need to be alarmed."

"This ship is unsinkable. There are enough lifeboats for everyone."

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Cute, coming from the Obamination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. ~ALL FIRED-UP FOR THE LADY~ YES SHE CAN, YES WE CAN YES WE CAN~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. you really shouldn't be drinking this early
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
19. Evidently you don't realize how many SDs are uncomitted and that they CAN and DO switch their votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. 2008 Dem Convention Watch
shows all the superdelegates most are still uncommitted

even the ones that are can change, sit shows both

http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-list.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. DC establishment? In with the old! The more the Dc Dem establishement
endorses Obama, it reminds me of old verses new. They endorsed Kerry and look where that got us. They need to shut up. They, (Dc Dem establishement) want more of the sameold, same old. I think they feel they can minipulate Obama back to more of the same old same old. Nice try!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. You go girl friend!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
24. Don't count the superdelegates so fast, they can change right up to the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC