|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:15 PM Original message |
can somebody explain why hillary voted for Kyl-Lieberman amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Um, she called it "diplomacy" ... just like she called the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. Kyl/Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Um.... Essentially, yes it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Revolutionary Guard. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Do you have a problem with S 970? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awaysidetraveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
37. Sanctions aren't the problem, the terrorist label is the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Then you should have problems with R 970 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. yes it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Thanks... I couldn't remember. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
21. R 970 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. So it was really an anti-war with Iran amendment then... right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. Here's Joe Wilson's take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. A very unbiased source there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. You ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. Oh, I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddiejoan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. How so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. At least I can say that I supported a candidate that DIDN'T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
3. NO, they can't explain it to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrioticintellect (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. I don't know why but she laughed about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
34. I just saw that clip yesterday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. We might be able to, but Hillary cannot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iwasthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. In a word... Politics ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. BUT BUT BUT MR. HOPE AND CHANGE WAZ ABSENT 4 TEH VOTE! SERIESLY!1! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
10. NO, can you explain why obama didn't bother to show up and vote for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I already had you covered in post #8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. That wasn't the question asked here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
14. That . . . appears to be the mystery of all mysteries. Except when it isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennifer C (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. A++++ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ORDagnabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. wow!!! thats awesome... never saw that one...when did it come out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
44. A few weeks ago, IIRC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DUyellow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
16. Obama wasn't there, so i voted for it... This is getting kind of low guys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
18. Two words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
19. I KNOW WHY SHE DID VOTED FOR IT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adigal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
22. Senator Webb said she as much as gave a green light to Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #22 |
45. Ding ding ding. She was the frontrunner by like 30 points when she did it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. Because they had an NIE and testimony saying that part of the IRG was aiding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. it didn't "call them out", it named them terrorists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
27. Well its a lie to say that Kyl-Lieberman granted any new war powers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
28. OK, this is a long answer I wrote once before - be warned, lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
31. pandering to the Jewish vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. Tell that to all the Jews I know who opposed Kyl-Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
32. Because she was for the war after she was against it after she was for it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
33. She thought voting for this whole thing would make her look tough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
35. Can you explain why Obama missed it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
38. Two Republicans had the guts to go against their party and vote against it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
46. because it doesn't authorize war with Iran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Exactly, it is a flat out lie to say that resolution authorized war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
47. F-L-O-R-I-D-A in the General Election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 04:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC