Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOXNews.com: "Michelle Obama Cool to Helping a Would-Be Clinton Candidacy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:48 PM
Original message
FOXNews.com: "Michelle Obama Cool to Helping a Would-Be Clinton Candidacy"


Michelle Obama Cool to Helping a Would-Be Clinton Candidacy

by FOXNews.com
Monday, February 4, 2008


Michelle Obama probably will not be the first person to jump on the Hillary Clinton bandwagon if her husband loses the Democratic presidential nomination. That’s not to say that she wouldn’t work for whoever becomes the eventual Democratic nominee, but the wife of presidential candidate Barack Obama indicated that if her husband doesn’t win, she’d have to take a closer look at Clinton before coming up with an assist.

“I’d have to think about that. I’d have to think about policies, her approach, her tone,” she said in an interview Monday morning on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“You know, everyone in this party is going to work hard for whoever the nominee is. I think that, you know, we’re all working for the same thing. And, you know, I think our goal is to make sure that the person in the White House is going to take this country in a different direction. I happen to believe that Barack is the only person who can really do that,” she said....

More: http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2008/02/04/michelle-obama-cool-to-helping-a-would-be-clinton-candidacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. whow ho--and from Fox!! --guess they do not want to be accused of bias.
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 02:57 PM by rodeodance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. And you accept this as fact?
That's how it goes with Fox?

If it's in favor of Hillary, it's true?
If it's not in favor of Hillary, it's false?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It is a direct quote
Not a whole lot of wiggle room there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The description of "cool" is subjective.
That is what I was referring to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. "I’d have to think about that. I’d have to think about policies, her approach, her tone"
Not exactly a warm response. What is the opposite of warm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I'd call it neutral.
In the statement, there is no:

-No
-Won't
-Don't
-Wouldn't...etc.

Thus, it is neutral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. NOT politically astute for a Pres. candidate wife who has been out on the trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. ha ha--now the obamababies are concerned about facts. WHOW HO
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 03:02 PM by rodeodance


Mon Feb-04-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. And you accept this as fact?

That's how it goes with Fox?

If it's in favor of Hillary, it's true?
If it's not in favor of Hillary, it's false?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. "WHOW HO" ???
never seen that expression before, until the two times you've used it. What's it mean? Where's it from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. you are kidding right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. No, not kidding. Edumacate me. n/t
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 03:19 PM by kineta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. nah. go educate yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Okay, I'll take that as your juvenile way of calling a woman a 'ho' then.
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 05:18 PM by kineta
you could have taken 15 seconds to explain without being rude. but no.

leaves me to think the worse of you. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Headline: Clintonistas Get Their News from FoxNews
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. See, the Obama family is not really ready for the Presidency.
They don't yet understand how it works or how to be Presidential at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. They should be tased, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. They need to be experienced is what I think.
Edited on Mon Feb-04-08 03:10 PM by liberalnurse
They are not prepared and We, America does not have time to break them in on the job.

If YOU want to Taser her..........go ahead, your idea.

The Obama's are not my candidate but yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. umm..that Obama 2:1 thingy just got a jolt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. In all honesty
I don't see why Michelle should actively campaign for her, Obama sure, but he is a politician something Michelle is not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwlauren35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. Michelle still needs some coaching...
No doubt about it.

There was a time when the candidate's spouse was not required to be "ready for prime time". Just wave and be pretty.

I'm trying to remember exactly when that changed. I think it happened slowly, when we began to realize how much Ronald Reagan was depending on Nancy. We actually weren't ready for Hillary Clinton when she was first lady, and people contrasted the demureness of Laura Bush as a welcome change. But by then, it had still become an issue. One of the aspects of Kerry that was picked apart was his wife. Edward's wife's cancer got major play. And you can't hide the role of Hillary Clinton's spouse.

If having a politically savvy spouse is now a requirement for office, Obama definitely cannot compete.

BTW, I'm for Obama, but I'll campaign my *ss off for Hillary if she gets the nomination. No offense to either democratic candidate, but I'd take Donald Duck over any of the Republican candidates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Self-kicking posts from Fox News is not going to ingratiate yourself with this Bonobo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh god, so now we put Fox here?
Listen, I am not an Obama supporter, never have been. But what she is saying is that she, personally, will not work on Clinton's campaign, which is fine.

She does not say that she will not vote for her, or work against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Consider the source.
The only reason to link to a Fox News "story" is to pile scorn, ridicule & abuse on the propagandist who wrote it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. How 'bout that? Faux put the whole thing correctly and in context, unlike TalkLeft, which LIED
about the exchange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Amazing isn't it
that Faux is more credible than much of what has been posted here on this subject?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Yes. Sad but true! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. Gee thanks for the unity Michelle (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJObamaWoman Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Unity doesn't mean that you have to accept everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. She fucked up here
The only answer to that question was "yes" and she blew it. Spin it any way you like. I'm sure you have an interesting definition to what "is" is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJObamaWoman Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. LMAO If we all said yes than we would be like the Nazis
Michelle is a smart FREE thinking woman. Just because she is a dem doesn't mean she has to say YES to everything that a dem politician suggests.

LMAO of course you would believe its spin. Michelle isn't HRC who didn't speak out against the War. Common sense and the courage to stand up to people and to trust in your convictions is something that Mrs. Obama has. Thats what makes her a STRONG, POWERFUL, FREE thinking woman with class.


Now you spin that baby :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Whatever, cupcake
She fucked up. Nothing to spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJObamaWoman Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. *Applause* Why the hell should she have to support Clinton?
This is America people. The Clintons have been disrespectful to the Obamas by calling Obama's campaign a fairytale. This has nothing to do with UNITY as some people like to see it. Unity doesn't mean that a person has to bendover backwards and take it. Michelle is right...she is going to have to research and come to a conclusion that Clinton would tackle some of the issues that she cares about before she can fully support Clinton if she gets the ticket. EVERYONE should do it. Thats what Oprah was talking about yesterday. Michelle is a FREE Thinker. HRC has to EARN michelle and baracks support if she gets the ticket. They shouldn't have to just support her because she is a democrat.


I applaud Mrs. Obama because is speaks to how I feel as a black woman who would be in the same situation as Michelle if Clinton got the ticket. The race baiting turned me off and HRC will have to EARN my vote. IMHO if people here just vote for the Dem. nominee because they are a dem., without seeing where these people stand than your a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. You're right, it's not about unity. It's about the people of the US and beyond.
The decision to support our nominee should be a no-brainer for anyone with a brain. I don't believe that Michelle will not support Hillary if she wins, but to put it out there as a possibility is detrimental to the "people" I noted above. Imagine if Bill Clinton had said this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJObamaWoman Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. I wouldn't expect Clinton to have supported Obama and if he said
that I would actually applaud him. Thats whats wrong with this party. We don't grill our party members. Just because your a dem doesn't mean that you should automatically get other dems support. If Obama got the ticket..he will need to EARN the clinton's support. I would respect that endorsement so much more than the Clintons just supporting him because he's a dem.

What Michelle said was the truth. At times the truth hurts and now the Clintons now that they are going to have to EARN the Obama's support. They just don't get it for free because they are apart of the same party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Democrats share the same basic values, which is why we identify with the term
"Democrat". It's not a matter of support "just because he's/she's a dem" it's a matter of supporting someone who shares in the same world view.

Thank you for reiterating what Michelle Obama said was "truth" because it's making my choice to remain uncommitted tomorrow easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Are you 12? Or just completely new to politics? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. Check out this example of unity.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4388367

Interesting that we find ourselves criticizing Michelle, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. yes, it is interesting--She said what she said. She can make up her own excuses-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MISSDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Very telling, no?
The pot calls the kettle black, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. I would only hope that Hillary and Bill would do the same for Obama if he wins.
The Primaries are fun for a little blood letting within the party but we have to remember the General Election is the most important race for our party. Those who lose in the Primary should not sit on the sideline and pout they should work to get a Democrat in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
43. How lame that Michele refused to say she would help support Hillary if Hillary won.
Interviewer: "Could you see yourself working to support Hillary Clinton?" (This was asked of her in regards to the possibility of her husband losing to Hillary).

Michelle: "I'd have to think about that. I'd have to think about, um, uh, policies, her approach, uh, her tone"

Interviewer: "So that's not a given"

Michelle: "You know, everyone in this party is gonna work hard for whoever the nominee is. Umm, I think that we're all working for the same thing, uhh, and I think that our goal is to make sure that the person in the WH is going to take this country in a different direction. I happen to believe that Barack is the only person who can really do that." End of interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
44. TRAITOR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freida5 Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
45. She needs to learn loyalty to her party. I cannot believe the arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC