Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The IWR was so 2002."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 04:48 PM
Original message
"The IWR was so 2002."
I saw this a little while ago in another thread. It wasn't meant with malice, as far as I could tell, but just a statement of the poster's belief. While I don't agree with this, I thought it was a succinct summary of what many Hillary supporters feel about the IWR and its importance to this years nomination process.

The odd thing is that it is reminiscent of Obama's constant refrain that his campaign is about the future not the past, so from that perspective should they harp on Hillary's IWR vote? Of course, the converse is that Hillary's campaign focuses on experience, so that using her criteria perhaps we should hold her vote against her.

The irony is that some of Hillary's supporters would be comfortable with Obama's theme stressing the future (at least with respect to this one issue), while Obama's supporters would be more comfortable (again at least with this) looking in the past - the IWR vote.

Of course, neither campaign consistently follows the themes they set out to campaign on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. The problem I have with her vote is that I don't believe it represented
her true beliefs at the time. I make no claim to clairvoyance but I think she knew damn good and well that it was all bullshit and that the administration was telling a pack of lies to get us into Iraq. But I think she was afraid to say so because Bill and his DLC buddies were telling her she would be crucified as "unpatriotic" and "soft on terrorism".

The other option is that she is so stupid she swallowed the bush line of crap. I don't believe that for a minute but if so, she is too fuckin stupid to be president.

So she is a either a moral coward or a gullible fool. There is no other explanation for her IWR vote.

I hope she is not the nominee. I will vote for her but I won't be happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's just that her reasons remind me of someone I rather respect
But it was also pointed out to me that while Kerry said something when the inspectors were not given time, and we rushed to war, Hillary did not, I am told. I'd have to go back and check her speeches to be sure. So while I think Kerry was sincere in his vote, there are those who say Hillary was not.

But I still found it interesting that her reasons for voting for the IWR and his are nearly the same. I find it hard to criticize her for it therefore if I am willing to cut Kerry slack.

But even though reasons for voting were the same, their actions after have been different. Kerry apologized, Hillary never did.

It's a bit more complicated than people prefer to make it.

But I am an anomaly in your theory. I am an Obama supporter, and I just said what you quoted, and so I am looking to the future re: Hillary, not the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its effects are still being felt today
It's not as if Iraq is a closed chapter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC