Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Swanson / AfterDowningStreet.Org /Scoop: Your Vote Will Be Thoughtful, But Will It Be Counted?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:36 PM
Original message
David Swanson / AfterDowningStreet.Org /Scoop: Your Vote Will Be Thoughtful, But Will It Be Counted?
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0802/S00026.htm

Your Vote Will Be Thoughtful, But Will It Be Counted?



By David Swanson
www.afterdowningstreet.org

By the time November 2008 rolls around, you will have endured over two years of breathless horse-race election coverage. (I, for one, am going to spend the next few days pushing Obama over Clinton, and then tune back in on Halloween to decide whether to vote for Obama, Nader, or McKinney. There are too many important things to work on in between.) But the big question (and one of the important things to work on) is this: will you have any way to know your vote is counted?

On February 12th, I'll vote for Obama in the Virginia Democratic Primary if it still matters (if it doesn't I'll vote for Kucinich). And I will have no possible way to determine whether my vote is counted. I'll be voting on a touch-screen electronic voting machine. There will be no piece of paper generated and stored as I vote. A "paper trail" may be produced later, but if the vote totals are monkeyed with by the machine, the paper trail will simply "confirm" the bogus numbers.

In the past few elections, and in the Florida primaries this week, we've seen such probems as: precincts turning out more voters than exist (is 110% voter turnout an achievement in some people's minds?), huge percentages of people voting in minor races but supposedly failing to vote at all in key contests, results that vary from unadjusted exit polls by unheard of margins, people forced to wait 12 hours to vote, people turned away in the general election who voted in the same location in the primaries, flyers advising Democrats to vote the day after the election, and dozens of other problems, most of them based in electronic voting machines, most - but definitely not all - of them swinging votes in favor of Republicans.

The new film "Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections" by David Earnhardt, tells this story powerfully and convincingly. If I were a reporter outside the United States and able to publish the story, I'd watch this film and report on the complete breakdown of credible democratic elections in the U.S.A. If I were an American of any political persuasion I'd have a hard time watching this film and not asking what I could do about this crisis. I'd leave a theater that showed this movie with a very different view of recent history from the orthodox. I'd come away understanding that the Democratic Party landslide in 2006 fell far short of what voters actually voted for, that George Bush has never once been elected president, and that the solution to the 2000 Florida debacle (the solution of buying electronic voting machines) took a relatively small problem and made it enormous.

"Uncounted" is a nonpartisan take on the issue that you can safely show to your Republican uncle. It concludes with a list of things you can do: Contact your congress member. Ask for election day to be a national holiday. Write a letter to the editor. Be an observer at the polls. Et cetera. But, as Brad Friedman of BradBlog.com points out in the film, if the cheating is happening inside a computer, it will make no difference how many people are observing it. What's needed is more than just ordinary involvement or passage of bills of the variety that George W. Bush will choose not to veto or erase with signing statements. Think for a minute about recent scandals coming out of Washington. I know there have been a great many of them, but the one I have in mind has been huge. Take a look at this list of proposed solutions from Mark Crispin Miller and pay special attention to points #11 and #12.

1. Repeal the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).

2. Replace all electronic voting with hand-counted paper ballots (HCPB).

3. Get rid of computerized voter rolls.

4. Keep all private vendors out of the election process.

5. Make it illegal for the TV networks to declare who won before the vote-count is complete.

6. Set up an exit polling system, publicly supported, to keep the vote-counts honest.

7. Get rid of voter registration rules, by having every citizen be duly registered on his/her 18th birthday.

8. Ban all state requirements for state-issued ID's at the polls.

9. Put all polling places under video surveillance, to spot voter fraud, monitor election personnel, and track the turnout.

10. Have Election Day declared a federal holiday, requiring all employers to allow their workers time to vote.

11. Make it illegal for Secretaries of State to co-chair political campaigns (or otherwise assist or favor them).

12. Make election fraud a major felony, with life imprisonment--and disenfranchisement--for all repeat offenders.

The first thing you may notice is that none of these 12 things can possibly be accomplished with Bush and Cheney in office. And, of course, the more election cycles we go through without accomplishing these things, the less likely it is that our elected officials will be people willing to attempt them. So, there is some urgency to this.

The scandal I hoped you might think of, of course, goes by the name "U.S. Attorney Firings," but it actually encompasses the politicization of the U.S. Department of Justice and an array of hiring and firing and indicting and prosecuting decisions all aimed at winning elections for Republicans. As this has played out in Congress, we've seen an attorney general unable to remember his own actions, and we've seen a president feloniously order former staffers not to comply with subpoenas. We've watched as the Democratic "leaders" in Congress refused for over half a year to vote on holding those staffers in contempt, and we've witnessed the removal of the power of impeachment from the U.S. Constitution.

By all means, get out there and vote and observe and counter any intimidation you see, and report any fraud you find evidence of. But, if you want to throw a monkey wrench into the gears of the machine that is stripping us of our hard earned franchise, you'll need more than computer software, you'll need a massive movement with enough force to compel the House Judiciary Committee to begin impeachment proceedings.

RESOURCES:

Interview with David Earnhardt:
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/interviews/093

Commentary:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5620

Watch the Trailer and Buy the DVD:
http://www.uncountedthemovie.com

Watch "Uncounted" at House Parties on February 13th:
http://www.blogforamerica.com/view/23717

Source: http://afterdowningstreet.org/node/30628


ENDS


**************

David Swanson is an organizer of the www.AfterDowningStreet.org coalition.

(Dear David.... Hope this is not out of order.... but its something that needs exposure.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Peace Patriot: California Election Integrity Estimate - On A Scale of +5 to -5 CA Gets A +1
From: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0802/S00050.htm


Scoop Blogwatch
Peace Patriot - Post on Democratic Underground Election Reform Forum - - Mon Feb-04-08
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4380748
(Note: Original post includes discussion thread.)

CALIFORNIA ELECTION INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT 2008


Prognosis on the reliability of CA's primary election results Feb 5


--On an election integrity scale of -5 to +5, California gets a +1--
--The state is improving, but has a long way to go--



CALIFORNIA: purpose of the assessment

This assessment is part of a DU Election Reform project to provide summaries of the election systems in states with upcoming primary elections, and a prognosis about election integrity (can we trust the vote count?). This summary provides many tools and pointers on where to look for problems (which counties? which election systems?) as the returns come in Feb 5-6, in this vast and complex state.


CALIFORNIA: presidential primary election Feb 5

California will hold a presidential primary election on Tuesday, February 5, 2008, along with many other states in the nation--the "SuperDuper Tuesday" Primary (15 primaries, 10 caucuses). The CA Democratic, Republican and smaller parties will nominate presidential candidates. The Democratic primary is proportional. (If a candidate gets 15% or more of the statewide votes, he/she gets some delegates for the party nominating convention.) The Republican primary is "winner-take-all." 370 delegates are at issue in the CA Democratic primary (440 including superdelegates); 159 in the Republican (173 all told).

In CA, voters must vote in their own party's primary election. They cannot cross over. However, independent ("decline-to-state") voters can request a Democratic Party primary ballot (--or an American Indep. Party ballot.) The Republican Party and other CA parties do not permit independents to vote in their primary. Independents comprise almost 20% of California voters.

The remaining two major Democratic contenders--Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama--are on the CA ballot. John Edwards remains on the ballot, although he suspended his campaign on Jan. 30. Mail-In (Absentee Ballot) voting--which has been on the increase in California (50% statewide)--has been in progress for some weeks. For a full list of Dem and Rep candidates on the CA ballots, see footnote (1). Also on the CA ballots will be several state propositions. See my footnote (2) (a personal view). The propositions will not likely affect turnout or votes for candidates.



...FOR MORE >>>>>>

Read more on Scoop.co.nz
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0802/S00050.htm

Read more on the Democractic Underground Election Reform Forum
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4380748
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bradblog: Your Daily Dose of Daily Kos Diarists in Dangerous Denial...
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5646#more-5646

Your Daily Dose of Daily Kos Diarists in Dangerous Denial...




The courageous anonymous diarists at Daily Kos, the world's largest so-called "progressive" blog site, continue their pre-emptive suicide.

Today's dangerous mislead, comes courtesy of anonymous poster "smintheus", who warns readers, in advance of Super Tuesday, that no matter what happens, there is nothing to worry your pretty little head about...

"Expect trouble at the polls on Super Tuesday. It's almost inevitable that there'll be screw ups due to human error. But if the NH recount documented anything it's that such random glitches rarely amount to much and aren't worth getting exercised over.
...
Conspiracy buffs don't seem to understand how much damage they do to the cause of election reform by looking instinctively for malice in every glitch and under every voting machine – even those with a paper trail."


Yes, "even those with a paper trail." There's one anonymous dKos lecturer who truly understands issues of Election Integrity. (Congressman Rush Holt thanks you for your bad work, "smintheus".)

To save you the click, his/her linked reference to "the NH recount" in the above quoted text, smartly cleanses the horrible election processes in the Granite State primary by incorrectly asserting (as if with evidence-based authority): "All results point toward an extremely clean election process, with small numbers of votes miscounted due to human error."

Translation: All is well. Just as it was in Florida 2000, Ohio 2004 and Sarasota 2006. Go back to bed. These aren't the droids you're looking for.

"Smintheus" goes on to salve the fears of us "conspiracy buffs"...

More...
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5646#more-5646
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Such tools. No fascist regime is complete without them.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-04-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick n Recommended,,nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Cheers ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Land Shark: Election Pollwatching Guide for California's CEO's (Citizen Election Observers)
From: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x496754

Keeping in mind that the vote counts will be nearly universally computerized secret vote counts for which there will be no evidence to support, there is nevertheless an important role for citizens to observe in CA's Super Tuesday primary. The link below has a guide adapted specifically for San Diego but most of which will likely be applicable statewide in California (use your judgment).

From Psephos (http://www.psephos-us.org ):

Citizens who met last week to discuss activities planned for tomorrow’s elections in San Diego identified the need for a succinct, easy-to-use poll watcher’s guide.

Psephos is pleased to announce that its Citizen Election Observers (CEO) Guide is available now on the Psephos web site. This step-by-step “pocket guide” is designed to provide poll watchers with a portable resource they can use throughout the entire day, covering chain of custody from the polling places through to ROV headquarters. This guide is targeted to poll watching activities tomorrow, during San Diego’s February 5, 2008. The materials are based on Psephos’ research of the California Election Code and recent clarifications from the San Diego County Registrar of Voters.

Download and print the guide here: http://www.psephos-us.org/Documents/ep_Psephos_CEO_Pocketguide_2.4.pdf using a printer with two-sided print capabilities.

Your Feedback Requested: Psephos would appreciate any feedback on the guide, especially from those who use the guide in the field tomorrow (submit to info@psephos-us.org ). Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. #5 here. Swanson is right on target. Elect him, forget the others.


The new math of elections also includes throwing people out of their homes and then denying them their vote on the basis of no address. Think about it, it's disgusting but that's what will happen with the recession/depression and election coming together with voters to form a perfect storm.

Massive Multiplayer Political Game

Right here: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0802/S00052.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Excellent - EXCELLENT - list of what we must do! Kudos! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC