|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:30 AM Original message |
Final Zogby Poll: Obama up 13 in California!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'm sick...oh God I want to believe, but I can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. me too! omg I think of NH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
23. That's because it's not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:43 AM Response to Reply #23 |
46. Yes it does. Zogby added early voting to the final results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:48 AM Response to Reply #46 |
59. Really? DK was reporting they didn't count them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:51 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. I will too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
58. i would not put my eggs on this one. REMEMBER New Hampshire everyone!!!! Get to work for Obama!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. Fatal, if true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 05:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
98. Know this: Obama IS momentum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #98 |
105. Happy Super Tuesday, Kitten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #105 |
113. Same to you, BG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Holy sweet Jesus, please let it be true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seen the light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
4. HOLY FUCKING SHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
117. Before you count chickens, remember that Cali has had LOTS of absentee voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
5. nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
6. there are other polls showing him down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
7. YEAH! MO-MEN-TUM!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
8. How |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:34 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. SUSA is way off from all the other polls in nearly every state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. They are gonna try that. Impression = reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Or galvanize people to go to the polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:44 AM Response to Reply #8 |
49. Because the smart money is on Hillary to win CA... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
9. Wave a twenty in front of him and he will give you a good poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
84. Polls come so cheap from him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
11. Polls are psychotic - final Survey USA has Hillary up 12 in California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:36 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I discussed this comparing these polls to Florida. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I guess we'll see tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:41 AM Response to Reply #24 |
39. I know you weren't, was just showing you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:41 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. And what is that supposed to mean? You Freeper! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:45 AM Response to Reply #40 |
54. growl! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:47 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Do you have any idea how many times I've been called that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:36 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Zogby has seen consistent movement in Obama's side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:38 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Polls taken at the same time shows a trend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:41 AM Response to Reply #21 |
38. I'm talking about Zogby's polls during the last 4 days or so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:44 AM Response to Reply #38 |
50. You are comparing apples to oranges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
118. Dont' put much faith in SurveyUSA--they have a crappy methodology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RL3AO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
13. I guess Obama might actually have a shot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. If there's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
15. Please let him be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
19. can one be skeptical & optimistic at the same time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:42 AM Response to Reply #19 |
45. I am both also. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
20. I hope Clinton's slight MO in NJ is because of a Superbowl effect in fertile Giants territory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:46 AM Response to Reply #20 |
56. If Obama comes within 5 points of her in Jersey, it's a victory n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
25. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
26. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
27. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
28. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
29. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
30. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
31. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
32. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tweed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:45 AM Response to Reply #32 |
52. Your posts would have been funny if this one right here were flipped to "AWAY FROM OBAMA" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:49 AM Response to Reply #52 |
61. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:00 AM Response to Reply #52 |
66. notice they all are timed at the same time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #32 |
116. Damn!!!! Do you studder? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
33. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
34. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
35. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
53. What'd you say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:48 AM Response to Reply #53 |
60. DITTO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:01 AM Response to Reply #53 |
67. I repeat myself, but not intentionally! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:18 AM Response to Reply #67 |
73. Never seen it before either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:51 AM Response to Reply #73 |
106. It's what happens when you hit "post message" over and over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Original message |
I don't believe it for a second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
41. A win is a win. Let's hope he makes it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:43 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. I don't wanna jinx it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
36. the trend is definitely breaking FOR Obama, away from Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
37. Think somebody is a little excited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:42 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. lol :D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:42 AM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Uh yeah... That's one way to get your post total up there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
42. I've been posting all night that Obama will take 12-14 states - including California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:43 AM Response to Reply #42 |
47. I agree with you. I think Obama ultimately wins Super Tuesday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:44 AM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Let's HOPE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:46 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Katz, I think NJ isnt going in Clinton's direction either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:59 AM Response to Reply #55 |
107. Um... can you explain this? What do the Giants have to do with the primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndieLeft (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:51 AM Response to Reply #47 |
62. Can you imagine how deflated all the Hillary supporters will be if he does? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tweed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:54 AM Response to Reply #62 |
65. The polls for TX, OH, and PA would be rolled out and kicked and kicked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
64. How weird was that? I posted one time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
68. I wouldn't assume anything about California, too many variables |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:12 AM Response to Original message |
69. Final SurveyUSA Poll in CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:15 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:15 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Whats Survey USA' track record so far? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:16 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Huh, I just noticed that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
74. no fucking way! omg... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
75. That's right, either way...California will show you how it's done I can't wait for tomorrow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
76. cautiously optimistic! on the early ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
77. I think this is misleading. More like things are in a dead heat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:29 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. That's true, and I've heard Zogby mention that he uses a rather small sample by comparision... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:31 AM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Zogby's sample size is the largest of any CA poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:43 AM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Is this what you're referring to: Sample - 967 LV? Dude that's dinky... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:56 AM Response to Reply #83 |
87. *chuckle* I'm comparing it to all the other polls coming out of CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:14 AM Response to Reply #87 |
92. No doubt, Field wasn't even on your list; though are you aware... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
78. I'm an Obama supporter, and I find that VERY hard to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
81. PLEASE let it be true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:36 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. lots of obama support around socal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:53 AM Response to Reply #82 |
85. That sounds good because his CA base is in The Bay Area. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:55 AM Response to Reply #82 |
86. interesting...I thought Clinton's stronghold was SoCal and Obama's was the San Francisco Bay area... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:00 AM Response to Reply #86 |
89. at least in already known voters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TLM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
88. I'm a CA early voter.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
90. What is Zogby smoking... I mean sampling these days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:07 AM Response to Reply #90 |
108. That would indeed be shocking :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
91. Yeah right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:15 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. you mean just like you are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyVT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
94. today's SurveyUSA poll has Clinton way ahead in California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:28 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Well, I would assume Super Bowl Sunday polls would be pro-Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:22 AM Response to Original message |
95. Not a vote has been counted yet so how can you say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeforChange (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 05:33 AM Response to Reply #95 |
97. GO OBAMA !!!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
99. There should be no polls allowed during the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
100. Why is SUSA poll results so different. Is Zogby the "Interactive" poll? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 06:49 AM Response to Reply #100 |
104. No. It is a telephone survey... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
workinclasszero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 06:23 AM Response to Original message |
101. Please let it be true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 06:25 AM Response to Original message |
102. I trust Zogby, but this is AMAZING...Too good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
103. We've got the barf bags ready for you. In case Zogby is wrong again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awaysidetraveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:11 AM Response to Reply #103 |
110. Zogby's been the most accurate so far, given the contenders. This is great news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. What is going on with Zogby? I participate in polls for them all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
109. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
111. Why does Zogby keep embarrassing himself with polls like these? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevietheman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
112. That's quite a powerful last-minute surge! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
115. see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC