Which is more phony?

[jackson_dem]

Person A: Says his biggest weakness is getting too emotional when seeing suffering.

Person B: Co-sponsors a bill in the spring. Later two senators bring forward a similar bill. Person B says nothing on the senate floor about it, issues no press statement on it, skips the vote. Later that night there is a debate. Person G brings it up and triggers a heated exchange between him and Person C, who he chides for voting for it. About five minutes later Person B speaks about the nation which was the subject of the bill but says nothing about any objection to the bill. After Person B is finished speaking Person A is asked the same question and without prompting strongly denounces the bill, something Person B consciously chose not to do. Later after seeing the fallout toward Person C over the bill Person B flip flops and claims to vigorously oppose the bill. He even goes as far as to use it to attack Person C.

Oh, and Obama's comments about Edwards are being taken out of context. It is idiotic though to think St. Obama is above "Washington politics" like he claims to be. Obamites are actually using it to continue the Obamite swiftboating of Edwards as a phony while they have amnesia about Obama's flip flopping and cowardice on Kyl-Lieberman. :eyes:

[waiting for hope]

1. I'll pick Person B.

I think Kyl and Lieberman are evil.

[jackson_dem]

2. Yup

But he did courageously admit his desk is messy. It is so courageous that the answer further humanized him to voters...