|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Blue_State_Elitist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:26 PM Original message |
Fineman saying the Kennedy endorsements didn't help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ursi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Latinos did it for her. May she get them amnesty in return for their families. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. How can he draw that conclusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. He really didn't say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Thanks for clarifying. Havocdad has the remote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. She's winning Massachusetts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. Kennedys endorsement helped just not enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ithinkmyliverhurts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. How in the hell can Fineman say that???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
godai (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. He didn't - see post #8 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. There would have been NOTHING without that endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. Oh, they helped. Obama should bring this in with 40% and he's in strong position for later states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
9. Obama was only polling 22% before the Kennedy endoresment in Mass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
splat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. K's reach to Richardson for O was rebuffed, he hung with Clinton instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KennedyGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. Tweety slapped him down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
13. Fineman's a dope. Take a look at the Mass polls--that sharp diagonal line going up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
14. Fineman CAN'T COUNT? Hillary was up by 40% in Mass at one point. Obama's surge here is AMAZING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
15. Was MSNBC the only one doing nonstop on endorsesment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. No shit, Sherlock. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
18. Clinton voters rejecting the politics of the Teddy Kennedy past. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 10th 2024, 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC