Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBC NEWS: OBAMA 840 DELEGATES, CLINTONS 830 in Super Tuesday Contests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:41 AM
Original message
NBC NEWS: OBAMA 840 DELEGATES, CLINTONS 830 in Super Tuesday Contests
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 10:50 AM by Dems Will Win
The Clintons were supposed to beat Obama by 350 delegates when this all started, then he hoped to be within 200. This is a shocker as Obama actually won about 10 more delegates last night than the previously inevitable Clintons.

NBC News, which is projecting delegates based on the Democratic Party's complex formula, figures Obama will wind up with 840 to 849 delegates, versus 829 to 838 for Clinton.

Clinton was portrayed in many news accounts as the night’s big winner, but Obama’s campaign says he wound up with a higher total where it really counts — the delegates who will choose the party’s nominee at this summer’s Democratic convention.

With the delegate count still under way, NBC News said Obama appears to have won around 840 delegates in yesterday’s contests, while Clinton earned about 830 — “give or take a few,” Tim Russert, the network’s Washington bureau chief, said on the “Today” show.

The running totals for the two, which includes previous contests and the party officials known as “superdelegates,” are only about 70 delegates apart, Russert said.

The bottom line is that the two are virtually tied.



http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8358.html


Obama is favored in at least 18 of the next 24 contests and the Clintons are not allowed by law to raise more primary $$ form maxed-out big donors, so it looks like Obama is right now favored to win the nomination and must be considered the front-runner. The Clintons would need NEW rich donors to win -- and they simply don't exist.

The next primaries and caucuses are:

LA, NE (caucus), WA (caucus) , Virgin Islands, ME (caucus), DC, MD, VA, HI, WI

The only possible states for the Clintons in this lineup are obviously just VA and maybe Maine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Since you insist on writing "Clintons", may I call your team "ObamaKennedys"?
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 10:44 AM by WinkyDink
Who lost Massachusetts?

Or would that be "ObamaOprahCult"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Call us whatever you like, just don't call us late to dinner!
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 10:51 AM by Dems Will Win
Because OBAMAOPRAHKENNEDYS just beat the Clintons last night for the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. I prefer
Opramady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. or Barackedy!
That's it then. It's Barackedy against the Clintons.

Inform the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
52. Was that supposed to be funny?
If it was, you failed miserably. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. An apostrophe was missed-sheesh!
Remember (as NPR stated this am) over 50% of California's voters had cast their votes early before Obama's recent surge. They stated that voting started in CA just after HRC's NH win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Clintons have had their Hillary 2008 campaign team together for 8 yrs.
Obama is doing really well with his newly formed team, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Hillary supported Lieberman over Lamont, right?
but she's pro war (she's DLC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Money Raised in January is an EXCELLENT barometer as to where the momentum lies!
Obama $ 32 mill from small donations vs Clinton's ~ $ 11 Mill from larger (spent out ) donations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I donated my first $$ to Obama in January
And I'm going to send some more today!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. My husband and I did as well. I also sent more this am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
30. Heard on the news this morning that 2/3 of Hillary's donors are maxed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. ouch. I guess the corporate candidates will be pushing for larger $ limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. I wouldn't put it past them to pass the legislation before the month is out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Yea, that's gonna happen....
And Bush will sign it real quick like...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. DU = Free Republic.
Why not just go one step further and call Hillary 'Klintoons?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
29. It does seem that way a lot, doesn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. Weren't Bill & Hillary the ones who proclaimed that, with them...
... you get "two for the price of one"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. You mean when Bill said that in 1992?
Funny. Right wing blogs are full of claims that Hillary is saying that on the trail here in 2007.

I find it fascinating that Obama supporters keep parroting swiftboating phrases from the Right.

Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. Huh?
The OP was simply talking about delegates.

It what way do you percieve that as a slur?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
57. You mean like when someone called Obama Obamaphobe?
Or his followers cultists? I think it's interesting you make a big stink about this, yet I've not seen ONE post from you deriding the slimy attacks on Obama and his supporters. Or are you one of the many hypocrites (on both sides), who think it's ok to disparage one candidate, but it's not cool to do it to another?

PATHETIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. where are you getting the info that he's favored in 18 of the next 24?
Are there Polls out or ... ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. again with this friggin Politico.com.....it is a repuke site!! WTF?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Hillary is DLC - that IS republican lite
google it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Okay so you can write Clinton off, and I won't vote for Obama in GE. Take care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. nice how does hillbot spin this?
haha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't need to spin it. You can gloat all you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Delegate counts are what counts in the end
A nomination is based on delegate counts, not what states are won or lost.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yeah, the votes of the people count for little. But then who needs to be
told that who has lived through the past eight years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. actually
the popular vote was pretty darn close, considering. Why can't anyone admit this round was a stalemate?

I feel like i'm on a playground and i keep hearing "I won!"... "No! I did!"... "You changed the Rules!"... "did not!"... "did too!"

blah, blah, blah.

I say they team up as BO/HRC for one term and then switch it up the next time around.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. One person, one vote is the way to go. No super delegates, no
complicated formulas based on Congressional districts, whatever. And no minimum percentages for representation.

If that makes the nomination process a bit messier, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. Dream on, the "Clintons" can collect from other sources and are.
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 11:17 AM by greyghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Jackson Stephens endowed the Clintons didn't he? heheh
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 11:32 AM by blm
Surely the deep-sixing of the BCCI report throughout the 90s was worth many millions to Jackson Stephens, Dubai and Saudi royals, Marc Rich, GHWBush and his many operatives.

And let's not forget the closing of the books on all the matters that were ongoing in IranContra and Iraqgate when Bill took office.

http://consortiumnews.com/2006/111106.html

Bush2 never should have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
21. I am so sick of
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 11:27 AM by ClericJohnPreston
the friggin Obamatons who act like spoiled Nursery School children who have to win at all costs, including at the expense of truth.

More people voted for Hillary than Obama. Obama doesn't resonate in any major urban center. He won in the South along racial lines. He is a regional candidate who doesn't do well in primaries and who has no appeal for the sophisticated voter, which is why he preys on neophyte voters. They don't know any better....as proven by the usual ridiculous spin.

CULTISTS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Exactly, his base is naive first time voters who are swayed by...
his rhetoric. They are totally clueless as to how this will go down and are grasping at the MSM's talking heads who are trying to make it a contest to help their ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Or maybe they just disagree with you
and think that Hillary will get eaten up and spit out by the press, just like Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Right, as much as the rethug MSM might like to, it ain't happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Um...she won by 1% ok. Lets not act like she won by 10% which some polls had her up that much
not long ago. Hillary won the states where Democrats win every election cycle, so why exactly is it such a victory? He did not win the South along racial lines; he doubled his vote among whites in GA for instance. You are so full of shit and so stupid to refer to us as cultists though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
32. You have issues, dude.
More people voted for Gore. More people voted for Kerry. You'd think that you'd understand that the popular vote doesn't count in the US.

Stop calling half the people here unsophisticated, it's very unsophisticated of you, douchebag. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. The Dude Has Been Here For One Fucking Month. He Has Some Nerve.
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 12:26 PM by Binka
What bloody cheek. I am signing off on DU until this mess is over. Hope you are well DS1. :hi:

Edit: clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. Ok tool
I'll wager my bona fides over yours anyday, chump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. shove them up your ass instead
goddamn troll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
44. Obamaton is juvenile...Name calling is juvenile and freeperish
As a former Edwards supporter please stop this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. Thanks for calling people like me a "Cultist"...
...who still has a candidate in the race and kicked the crap out of candidates like John Edwards.

:hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. Obama camp claiming O-908, C-884
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. Superdelegates can vote who they want as well
I don't like or agree with that system but none of the superdelegates have to have their minds made up until the convention. If it looks like Obama has a lead in delegates and momentum they could vote his way. The next few primaries are very important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
28. I'd just comment that Hillary could raise money through small donations ...
... from lots of donors;

... and also that all states are up-for-grabs, though O's money edge may help him counter Hillary's name recognition.

It's all tied-up, heading into the second half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
31. kick and rec...
obama has the most money, states, delegates, and momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. ditto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. another kick!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. Yippee! When I left home this morning I thought we were behind!
This is great!!!!!!!!!!!:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. CNN still shows: Clinton 811, Obama 720. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. hrc 619 + 193 = 812 & bho 614 + 106 = 720 1:48 p.m. c.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. OK
That's del + super-del. Makes sense. What is the breakdown of MSNBC's numbers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
53. Hillary has some Latino union support I thought, she only has a small percent
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:09 AM by caligirl
of smaller donors. Unfortunatley the people supporting her are the ones in the lower income grooup where money is too tight, and the top tear who are maxed out. She is indebt to her senate fund having used it up last fall. All she has left is the GE fund and thats off limits. She has more personal money and Bill has his foundation fund from secret donors but it would be off limits.


By way of contrast, Clinton raised only 15% of her individual contributions in the fourth quarter money from donors who gave unitemized contributions of $200 or less. While both candidates depended heavily on "bundlers" to collect large contributions in 2007 (see "Fundraising Central" report here), Obama's success with small donors has opened a new path to help fuel his campaign.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/1/173227/9625
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
55. In other words, she's still ahead, as she was before Super Tuesday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Leaking oil and momentum slowing, but still ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC