Stronger DNC stewardship for elections and party infrastructure: Dean's or McAuliffe's

[blm]

Poll question: Stronger DNC stewardship for elections and party infrastructure: Dean's or McAuliffe's

Feel free to explain and share your analysis after you vote.

[TexasObserver]

1. Dean by a mile. Not close.

Terry's job was to help the Clintons continue a degree of control of the party organization. He worked for them, not the party, just like now.

[mahina]

2. 50 State strategy~

Why in heavens name would we hand the Republicans half of the game, without even trying? Lame!
Thank you Howard Dean!

[blm]

6. Well, some Dems think those state party infrastructures were collapsed in the 90s and

weakened further before 2004 as a deliberate strategy to protect the 2008 election cycle for a powerful Democrat.

[blm]

12. ^^ so far Dean ahead^^

would love to hear from McAuliffe supporters.

[Renew Deal]

3. You're seeing McAful's failed strategy at work for Hillary right now.

[blm]

10. Not so sure. I think they really never prepared for a real primary battle

out of sheer arrogance.

[blm]

13. ^^ analysis from proTerry voters?^^

.

[AtomicKitten]

4. Dean represents the party -- McAuliffe represented the Clintons.

In a nutshell.

[blm]

5. I've appreciated your willingness to revisit the issue and the facts. (nod)

.

[AtomicKitten]

7. It only required open eyes and mind.

Something I only recently acquired, sadly, but, as they say, knowing is half the battle! I am reasonably confident Dean will hold tight in the face of the sure to come Clinton assault on the process.

[TexasObserver]

8. Yea-ahhhhh!

I agree 100%.

[blm]

9. It's gonna be a battle.

It's going to require heightened sense of unity from all who want a chance at honest and accountable government.

[blm]

11. ^^^^

^^^^