Bush won more states than Al Gore. Go Bush!

[comfycouch]

Isn't it silly how some here cheer their candidate just because he won a higher number of states than his opponent?
As if states had the same number of people.
As if Al Gore didn't win in 2000 even if Bush won 9 or 10 more states, if we count Florida for Gore.

In life, everything is relative. Now it's time to believe in the importance of the number of states won. In 2000, it wasn't.

[Cha]

1. How silly is your skewed version

of reality.. but have a good time with your lameness.

[CTD]

2. Well, if you add up the vote totals by state, Obama has more votes too.

And more committed delegates... And more cash...

You guys are *really* reaching at this point...

EDIT- Fix typo

[comfycouch]

5. Bush had more cash too

And the similarities continue.

[CTD]

6. And Bush became president too. I guess the similarity will continue even further then.

This comparison is pointless and desperate sounding.

[comfycouch]

7. Of course, if you expect Obama to steal the elections

Funny that you mention who BECAME president, and now thow WON the presidency.
Because it does not fit your script, of course.

[CTD]

8. This thread wins are possibly the most innane pro-HRC thread yet.

[sakabatou]

3. As the *NSYNC once sang...

"Bye, bye, bye."

[mmonk]

4. Wow. I've seen it all now.

[DIKB]

9. Their reasoning isn't the number of states won.

It is the crossover appeal of the people in those states.

Your argument is simplistic "freeper-logic"

[angie_love]

10. erm ok??

:shrug:

[tammywammy]

11. Yeah, I found it

The Stupidest Thread of the Day.