Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama, "We Are No Longer A Christian Nation,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:17 PM
Original message
Obama, "We Are No Longer A Christian Nation,"
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 09:55 PM by andyrowe
"at least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation and a nation of non-believers."


source -- Imagine Barack Obama

Yes, I can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. My favorite video so far n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Mine too but
I know there'll be more inspiring videos to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's great
he mentioned Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus...and non-believers too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Refreshingly brave statement on religion.
You've got to admit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's a wonderful paragraph!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Agreed
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. "At least not just"
I wish you'd had that in your title. Great video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Appreciated. You've got to lure 'em in though.
Got to get them ready to Imagine Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. He is either lying or ignorant. We have NEVER been a Christian nation
We have always been a secular nation, and may we forever be so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. For a period of our history, some christians have claimed
it was. In fact, some still do today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
80. "some christians have claimed..."
FERVENTLY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. He's neither
but it helps understand if you read what he said.
http://obama.senate.gov/speech/060628-call_to_renewal/

...but here's the part that ought to put your mind at ease on whether he's going to be some sort of theocrat
I want to talk a little bit about what conservative leaders need to do -- some truths they need to acknowledge.

For one, they need to understand the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but the robustness of our religious practice. Folks tend to forget that during our founding, it wasn't the atheists or the civil libertarians who were the most effective champions of the First Amendment. It was the persecuted minorities, it was Baptists like John Leland who didn't want the established churches to impose their views on folks who were getting happy out in the fields and teaching the scripture to slaves. It was the forbearers of the evangelicals who were the most adamant about not mingling government with religious, because they did not want state-sponsored religion hindering their ability to practice their faith as they understood it.

Moreover, given the increasing diversity of America's population, the dangers of sectarianism have never been greater. Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.

And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles.

This brings me to my second point. Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that heir proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all.


I'm proud atheist and had concerns when I first looked at Obama. A little digging and research put any fears to rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Only the Sith deal in absolutes.
Stating something like he's either lying or ignorant is a sneaky way of limiting the interpretation of what he was actually saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #34
70. Sometimes, it really is that either/or, despite what Rovians want to believe
Look at the line, "we are no longer just a Christian nation...." The point that Obama is making is hinged on the statement that the United States, at some point in the past, was "just a Christian nation." That is flat-out untrue. Despite the desperate perception by some people that Obama is God Returned To Earth and The Savior Of America, the fact that he said something does not make what he says true.

If Obama knows that we were never "just a Christian nation," then he is lying when he implies otherwise.

If Obama does not know that we were never "just a Christian nation," then he is woefully ignorant of American history.

Please explain any additional alternatives, as I don't see any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
69. I was responding based on what the OP posted
Apologies for not taking the time to dig deeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #69
96. no problem
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockyTorres Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. He can't believe that
While I know our country was not found on Christianity, Obama needs to face reality. I do not condone religion in government issues, but try telling that to someone from Alabama or the BIBLE BELT south. Many of those people will vote for a candidate just soley based on their religious convictions. I do not agree with their reasoning, but with primaries in states such as Ohio and Texas, he needs to watch what he says. While he will not carry rural areas, there are still votes out there and believe it or not, most of those areas (in Ohio and Texas) are full of Christians...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's taken from the video. You missed the "at least not just." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockyTorres Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. I know that...But
I know that but do not think for a second that that piece of film will not be cut off and spun...especially if he wins the nomination and goes to the general election...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. People are smart enough to see he was being inclusive.
Even christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It is time to change the politics of intolerance for those who believe different from other.....
that's what this campaign is all about. Banishing the politics of hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. How about those like the founders who believe in separation of church and state?
Are atheists citizens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Obama says yes!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Well said.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. welcome to DU
I'm sure many if not most of the people who voted for him in Kansas & 'bama & everywhere else are self described Christians
I also think most of them understand that this can be a nation mostly of Christians without being a Christian nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Agreed
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. We never were
Treaty of Tripoli.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I follow you but the religious right has pressed that point and
Obama is willing to speak against it this thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. Also, Thomas Jefferson wasn't a Christian.
He didn't believe Jesus was divine. He published a version of the Bible with all the miracles taken out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I didn't know he has published his own version of the bible.
Neat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. We were NEVER a Christian nation. Separation of church and state - remember that one?
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 09:38 PM by robbedvoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I do. And Obama is reminding the right of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Yes and no - the Constitutional Convention came close
to establishing a religion (banning Catholics from office, for starters). I think the vote was something like 38-30, someone else will let us know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
85. I guess it depends on...
how you look at it...

The Constitution and Voting Rights

The U.S. Constitution left the issue of voting rights up to the states. The only thing that the Constitution said about voting was that those entitled to vote for the "most numerous Branch of the state legislature" could vote for members of the House of Representatives



1776 to 1779

White men had the right to vote and take part in government, but usually had to meet certain qualifications, like owning property. Six state governments eliminated all property requirements and gave the right to vote to all white males over twenty-one years of age, rich or poor.

At the same time, three other state governments increased the property requirements, limiting the right to vote. In some states, the right to vote included the requirement that a person belong to a particular religious group.


http://www.lwvabc.org/pubs/history_of_vote.html

http://www.historynow.org/09_2004/historian.html
The basic principle that governed voting in colonial America was that voters should have a "stake in society." Leading colonists associated democracy with disorder and mob rule, and believed that the vote should be restricted to those who owned property or paid taxes. Only these people, in their view, were committed members of the community and were sufficiently independent to vote. Each of the thirteen colonies required voters either to own a certain amount of land or personal property, or to pay a specified amount in taxes.

Many colonies imposed other restrictions on voting, including religious tests. Catholics were barred from voting in five colonies and Jews in four.


The right to vote varied widely in colonial America. In frontier areas, seventy to eighty percent of white men could vote. But in some cities, the percentage was just forty to fifty percent.
------------
By 1790, all states had eliminated religious requirements for voting. As a result, approximately sixty to seventy percent of adult white men could vote. During this time, six states (Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Vermont) permitted free African-Americans to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. "We Are No Longer A Christian Nation" --
May be true, but if Hillary's middle name was Hussein, somehow I think she'd make a point of NOT saying things like that. Guess that's just what comes from inexperience. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. The chorus of cynics grows louder and more
dissonant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
51. So now stating facts about America shows inexperience?
Is it possible for Clintonites to not spin something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
81. And the list of things...
Hillary is NOT saying would grow even longer...
Political expedience - what a VIRTUE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. So, we are all those nations.. What happened to "one nation?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. They are all facets of our one nation.
Like a gemstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. I didn't see "many nations" there
One nation. We're a nation that is Buddhist, a nation that is Muslim, a nation that is Christian, a nation that is Jewish, a nation that is Freethinking. It's greater than the sum of the parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Well said.
We've got the cynics on the run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #37
64. My head is spinning!
So my car can be a red car, a green car, a blue car, a black car AND a white car. All at the same time.

Man! I tell ya! That is some freakin' car I got here! B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bongo Prophet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. No, you live in a country that has all those colors of cars and you are free to choose
You could also have a multi-color car if you want. That would be cool.

You were probably just kidding, though, right? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. Great video. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I stumbled onto it shortly after it was posted.
It's got me fired up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
39. You have to admit that it's a brave statement
for an aspiring President to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
40. " Nation of non-believers" ? panderer- like he doesnt know the word atheist
what a bullcrap artist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. "Non-believers" is probably more inclusive
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 01:20 AM by jberryhill

An agnostic is a non-believer.

An atheist is a non-believer in one sense, but is a believer in a specific negative proposition.

But, my goodness, the statement left out Zoroastrians, Scientologists, Pagans, and a lot of others. I doubt it was intended to be a precise catalog of all species of belief and non-belief.

He didn't get anywhere near the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Scientologists are for Ron Paul. The FSM has endorsed
Obama. We are unstoppable now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustinL Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. he does know the word atheist
speech at Ebeneezer Baptist Church

start listening at 16:29

That's how Dr. King led this country through the wilderness. He did it with words -- words that he spoke not just to the children of slaves, but the children of slaveowners; words that inspired not just black, but also white; not just Christian, but also Jew and Muslim and Buddhists and atheists; not just the southerner, but also the northerner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. Good eye. Besides non-believer isn't any less dangerous
than saying atheist I feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. The chorus of cynics grows louder and more
dissonant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmudem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #40
52. I'm an atheist
Don't see any problem with that term. You're nitpicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. Agreed.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. "Humanist" is more positive
"Atheist" is just another word for non-believer.

It's a way of labelling someone for what they don't believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. I believe Humanist has been co-opted by Satan worshippers.
Wait. Are there two p's in worshippers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. OK then. How about "Rationalist"
People who believe in reason, as advocated by Thomas Paine and Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. I like.
But do you think one can believe in God and be a Rationalist? I don't think they're mutually exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. Maybe
But as a Rationalist I would have to ask what is the basis for believing in "God"?

Is there any actual evidence or is it just because everyone keeps talking about it/him/her?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Got me there. I'm the last one to argue that
religion is rational.

Though I do miss "This Week In God" on the daily show. I hope they settle that strike on Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #62
89. Ever been to Montana?


Ever met anyone from Montana?

I have no objective evidence that there is a Montana. I only know what I've been told about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #58
88. Do atheists have to be rational?

I affirm the humanity of irrational atheists as well as rational atheists.

Did Obama mention them?

Dang... it's going to have be a much longer list next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #56
87. So... what do you have against Nihilists?

Picking out non-humanist atheists for abuse, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #40
75. Um your forgot the
:sarcasm: part at the end of your message. I know what you meant though ;)

How many points in his favor do you people have to dismiss before your words sound hollow to your own ears? That's gonna be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #40
83. I am a non-believer who does NOT...
consider himself an atheist. The correct term is agnostic. Get a grip - and a dictionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #83
90. Well there you go...

Obama referred to non-believers, not disbelievers.

You radical fundamentalist agnostics are dangerous folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #90
98. I just hope...
that we are dangerous enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #40
95. Afraid of the word "atheist", probably. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leeny Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #95
101. Not all non-believers are atheists
Atheist means that you believe that there is not a god. Some non-believers, like me, are agnostics. So I think he used the best word he could to describe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leeny Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
100. From a non-believer AND non-atheist
I'm a non-believer... don't believe in "god"... but I'm also NOT an atheist. Atheist means that you believe that there is not a "god". I think the accepted label for me is agnostic. I, however, prefer free-thinker. So... I think non-believer IS the right word.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #40
103. Another atheist here, who thinks you're nit-picking.
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 03:54 AM by impeachdubya
I'm thrilled with the sentiment behind his statement.

At a time when this "Christian Nation" bullshit is rampant, I think it's right on target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
45. Wonderful! I can't believe he was brave enough to say that! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. Shows he aspires to do the people's work and not just
to get to sit in the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
48. I hope someday you'll join us kick.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
49. sadly, that clip will be used by the RNC in the ge.
:-/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Have no fear!!
The chorus of cynics will be drowned out by the power of the voices of millions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. I dunno. The people who believe this is a Christian nation outnumber us sane folks.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 04:11 AM by Herdin_Cats
But still, I'm glad he said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
55. How can America be all of those nations at the same time?
I think the word Obama is looking for is "secular".

As in - "We are a secular nation".

As in - separation of Church and State.

I know - it's kind of old-fashioned.

Plus - religious nuts don't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. So, what exactly about non-believers bothered you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CompSciStudent Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
61. A new BO lie: 83 % of Americans Say They're Christian, 13 % no religion, 4 % others
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/beliefnet_poll_010718.html
---------------------------------------------------

This poll used an open-ended question to gauge religious affiliation: "What if anything is your religion?" Most of the 50 affiliations cited are Christian denominations, ranging from the Assembly of God to the United Church of Christ. Added up they show that 53 percent of Americans are Protestants, 22 percent Catholics and 8 percent other Christians, such as Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses.

Protestant Groups
The largest group within the ranks of American Protestants is unaffiliated: Nineteen percent of Americans say they're Protestants, but don't cite a specific denomination. They account for more than a third of all Protestants.

Another 15 percent of Americans identify themselves as Baptists or Southern Baptists, meaning this group accounts for nearly three in 10 Protestants. No other Protestant denomination comes close in size.

Baptists are especially prevalent among black Americans: Nearly half of blacks, 48 percent, say they're Baptists, making it far and away their No. 1 denomination (next are nondenominational, at 15 percent of blacks, and Methodist, at 8 percent of blacks). Among whites, 22 percent are Catholics, another 22 percent are nonaffiliated Protestants and 13 percent are Baptists.

Blacks, who are overwhelmingly Christian, are also more likely than whites to have any religion: Just 3 percent of blacks say they have no religion, compared to 13 percent of whites. ("No religion" includes people who describe their religion as atheist or agnostic.)

----------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #61
65. Really CompSciStudent?
Really!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #61
71. It looks like MySpace is a Christian space though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #61
73. How is that a lie? 1/5 of people are not Christian. That means we are not just a Christian nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #61
78. BWAHAHA
Welcome to DU! :wave:

Enjoy your stay and please give my regards to free republic when you get back there.

Oh and kick Rovey Poo in the sack for me would you? Thanks :wave:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
66. How many people have jumped/will jump the gun and
reply to this without watching the linked video first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. about 40-45% is my guess, its a great video n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
72. We are not a Christian nation - We are an Obamanation.
The new religion!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #72
77. Better than a Clinton nation or a Bush nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
74. The repukes are salivating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. Yup of a Clinton nomination
10+ years of dirt, scandals, and hate to throw at her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #74
79. Yeah we should all dump Obama
And jump on the Triangulator Train! What we need is a cold calculating politician who's in bed with corporations and cares more about winning than honesty and promoting progressive ideals.

Now where do we look for someone like that... hrmmmm :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #74
84. well, it WILL make a good slogan for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #84
91. Perhaps, but it's not enough to sway my vote.
I'm fired up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #84
97. I'd *love* for the GOP to attack
Obama for this.
McCain calls on Obama in a debate for daring to say we aren't "a Christian nation"
Obama says "Well it isn't John, and you and your second wife ought to be glad."

Yes. Please let the republicans use this to attack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #74
104. What, precisely, in that statement do you disagree with?
Edited on Sat Feb-09-08 03:55 AM by impeachdubya
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
82. as a Clinton supporter I agree with him as well does Hillary on this issue
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 10:58 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #82
86. I love it when Obama and Hillary supporters agree.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
92. You forgot this
Yes, I can :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
93. That was a great video. Can you link it here? I forgot to bookmark it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-09-08 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #93
102. The link is in the original post.
Or you can search "imagine barack obama" on youtube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
94. Great, but why does his campaign go so far out of their
way to say how CHRISTIAN he is, and he's not a Muslim, NO NO NO!!!!

As a non-Christian, I find it worrisome that the President has to be vetted for Christianity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
99. I can't believe it. Wow, it's about time he acknowledged non-believers.
But his rhetoric belies that. He doesn't mean what he says, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC