|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 11:59 AM Original message |
Every day Clinton was ahead, she went to the debates that were asked of her,Obama now nixing debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. And Obama went to all the scheduled debates, too. 18 is enough. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. No he didn't - he skipped the AARP debate early on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. He was at every debate arranged by the DNC. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. peoples right to know/money shouldn't decide elections" - Is Obama a liar or a coward - or both? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
35. 50 ain't old. That's the age you're eligible for AARP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Exactly. Debates are about covering the issues, not for free advertising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_State_Elitist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. So much for his unity and open government bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. This debate thing is laughable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Open Government. Why don't Clintons release their 2006 tax returns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_State_Elitist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Because she is a poltician with flaws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Seems more like they're hiding something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
islandmkl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. what kind of flaw will the tax return expose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
44. On the other hand it could be that debating is cheap advertising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. This campaign has already produced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. 18 is enough, no FREE Advertising n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tyne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Why should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
557188 (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Hillary raised $118 Million Dollars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
40. Oh, Ho Ho Ho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:02 PM Original message |
Funny, she wasn't too keen on debates in 2006 > |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
7. Obama went on the debates too when he was ahead. whats your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
8. Perhaps she can buy time on Hallmark again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
45. I never heard what that cost. Did you? I assume it cost a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdxmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
14. Her asking for debates now is a pretty transparent ploy and Obama is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. You get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. Every day that Clinton was ahead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. HELLO the primaries are NOW IN PROGRESS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sunonmars (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
20. the headline will be "Obama scared to debate Clinton" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. You mean "should be". You didn't see a "Bush scared to debate Gore/kerry" headline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaryninMiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Or- Obama has done 18 debates and there will be more- but does not need the free t.v. time now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tennessee Gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
22. Since getting down to two candidates there has only been ONE debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Agreed, why doesn't one of the candidates want to debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
23. Every day Clinton was ahead, her name was CLINTON. Obama needs to go campaign in front of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
splat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
24. Every change to get the Dems on TV should be grabbed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
27. what's he afraid of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
islandmkl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
28. maybe she has one good (planted) question for Obama that she is dying to have asked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
30. As if we haven't had enough already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
32. How very GOP-ish of him! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
34. But, but, but, Clinton supporters insist Obama lost huge on Tuesday! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. well, I am not a Clinton supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haroldgiowa (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
36. Obama doesn't want any more debates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notundecided (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
38. Remember the Lincoln-Douglas Debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
39. Hillary wants debates because she's running out of $$$ -> Obama is scoring with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
41. Any more debates would be nothing more than Jello wrestling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
42. She is the best debater. They've had ONE debate one on one. He is wrong to decline...looks bad 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
43. I heard a very rational explanation of Obam's decision this morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
46. The debates have been as exciting as watching paint dry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC