Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will we get a recount in California?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:33 PM
Original message
Will we get a recount in California?
http://cbs2.com/politics/Ballot.Double.Bubble.2.646580.html

Or specifically, Los Angeles County

Los Angeles City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo Tuesday issued the following statement in the wake of numerous reports of wide-spread nonpartisan voter confusion over Los Angeles County's "double bubble" voter ballot:

"I have heard numerous reports from voters throughout the City of Los Angeles which point to wide-spread voter confusion over Los Angeles County's so-called 'double-bubble' Decline-to-State non-partisan voter ballot. We understand this ballot is unique to the County of Los Angeles.

"In light of these reports, I am calling upon Secretary of State Debra Bowen and L.A. County Registrar Dean Logan to review the county's unique and potentially confusing ballot design.

"It would be unfortunate if non-partisan voters, confused by the county's unique "double bubble" ballot design, did not have their vote counted.

"I urge the Secretary of State and County Registrar to do everything within their power to ensure that every vote is counted, and to carefully weigh voter intent against this confusing Los Angeles County ballot design.

"Los Angeles' non-partisan voters must not be disenfranchised because of a confusing ballot design."


Over 700,000 voters may have been disenfranchised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, because of blowback
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 02:52 PM by TexasObserver
You want to move forward, not get stuck looking at a loss, even though there are probably serious irregularities in the voting process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. 700,000 votes is enough to change who the winner was
of course Hillarites want to move on, just like Bush did in 2000 and 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Clinton currently leads by ~400,000 votes and the 700,000 in question are all Independent voters
Who is it that draws the most Independents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. You're claiming every DTS voter voted in the primary?
Voted incorrectly by not filling out the 2nd bubble?

And that they would all break for Obama?

:shrug:

I doubt that. There could be a delegate ot two swing but it won't change the winner.

They should count votes with clear intent.

San Diego went thru this bubble nonsense with Donna Frye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Personally, I don't think they'll all break for Obama
But they need to be accounted. A 5-10 delegate swing could really help Obama.

Above all, all the votes need to be counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. If the Obama campaign wasn't impacted, they wouldn't be raising the question.
A lot of people got their vote uncounted because of stupidity.

I don't care how they break, I want to know our votes are COUNTED or THIS is all for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The 700,000 number
is the total number of uncommitted voters. It's not realistic to believe every one of them filled out the ballot incorrectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. If they fight it they destroy Democratic credibility on the issue
They need to do it if the intent is clear - even if it changes the "winner", it changes the winner. Would they have rejected the 2000 recount where re-examining the ballot was possible? How many of them piled on John Kerry who didn't have ballots to examine because they were ether or never cast? We need to count the votes, if the intent was clear and unambiguous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Huh?
If this is a problem that can be resolved by looking more carefully at the ballot AND if it is possible to get an unambiguous idea of intent, why not? This is precisely the time to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. it's a party primary. "disenfranchise" actually has nothing to do with it.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. The ballot there was different than in the rest of the state??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. From what I'm getting here on DU it was.
In No Cali the DTS voters got the same Dem ballot and signed for it in advance with an explanation when they signed the register. All of those ballots were counted. It seems as if the bubble was on the ballot in LA and if you didn't mark your ballot the whole thing wasn't caounted. Also the voters were not told to do that. That's what I'm now understanding from the posts on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Crazy - I sure hope something is being done about this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. i trust the obama campaign to make sure every vote counts.
i trust debra bowen to easily determine the intent of the voters. lets' set and example of how to answer questions properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hope something is done for one simple reason:
the General Election.

The problems the states had during the primaries will likely show up again in the GE if they aren't investigated and, more importantly, RESOLVED!

This isn't just about Clinton and Obama ... this is about US. We hear these stories after every election: confusing ballots, not enough ballots, not enough machines, not enough poll workers, uninformed poll workers, machines that don't work, machines that switch a vote from one candidate to another, confusion about polling place locations, confusion about polling place hours, long-time voters not being on the voting rolls, votes being challenged at the polling place ... the list goes on and on.

Enough of this shit! We've been having elections in this country for over 200 years ... why is it so fucking difficult to get it right?! :grr:

Sorry for the rant ... but I am so tired of hearing stories like this after every election and I'm fed up with the idea that a recount can't be done unless a CANDIDATE requests it. What about the 700,000 people whose votes weren't counted? Why don't they have a say in this? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes, they should and probably would do it.
Most other precincts had the DTS voters decide on their ballot and sign in the bubble on the registration log and thus much of the confusion was avoided. If the bubble was on the Ballot in LA, and workers didn't explain that to the voters, the trainers should be fired and all of the Dem ballots should be recounted given the benefit of the doubt to the DTS voter's intent. This situation is unique so far to LA, and whoever approved that type of ballot should be fired. It smells like disenfranchisement to me and it smells like it was intentional. I hope Bowen acts on this and I think she will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. They should or the whole thing is just a joke.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:52 PM by sfexpat2000
I hope Debra Bowen gets it.

ETA: And it's not just L.A. County either. Santa Clara County also had massive problems and who knows who else because the local people go out of their way NOT to make this information public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC