Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why hasn't Edwards endorsed either one yet? Do you think he should?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:08 PM
Original message
Why hasn't Edwards endorsed either one yet? Do you think he should?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it is just fine for him to wait
He has a few delegates, and will have some power throughout the summer. No need to be hasty, he can wait and see who actually comes through on their promises to make poverty and his other issues prominent in their campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. hmmm...you make a good point
still, as a supporter, I'm very curious to see which one he'll go with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Why hasn't Edwards endorsed either one yet? "
Does he have to officially withdraw before he can release his delegates?

Doesnt an endorsement bring with it his delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's where it gets fuzzy for me. He's still getting delegates, so...
I guess you're right. Doesn't that mean he's got to endorse before the convention? Hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. He wants AG, and so will endorse whoever he thinks will win.
That's the only reason he'd endorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Where did you get that information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. From their ass. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
61. Let's not ask him to "reveal his source" then
mmmm ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. I read the Edwards supporters posts after he quit.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:17 PM by MethuenProgressive
They all seemed to be in agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. With all due respect, that doesn't mean anything much unless it comes directly from JE
the buck stops with him, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Then why post your question to DU if none of our answers "mean anything much"?
You do you none of us are John Edwards, don't you? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. The point I was making is that it's all speculation unless it comes directly from him.
no need to be snarky and no offense was meant, either. Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. I posted the question to y.o.u. and the answer is that you are making stuff up
...wah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. AG...Attorney General??
Do you know that for sure? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Did he tell you that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. I really hope if John endorses, he gives Clinton a fair shake.
UHC is a good reason and there are more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauldg0 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. Empty headed..........

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe Obama's comprehenive plan to rebuild New Orleons will help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. hmmm...could be
it'll be interesting to see where he swings, regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLALady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe he has a chance for a VP spot.
If that's the case, he shouldn't endorse either.

One can only hope.

If he's on the ballot, I will vote for him Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. He was on my ballot and I voted for him.
a VP spot would be great! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I hope not....he can make a bigger difference for economic justice
without his hands tied in the EOB. Much like Gore has done for the environment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. EOB? sorry, I'm lame
:shrug:
I get your point, though. If he DID get the pick and he DID actually agree to go for it, though, there would be NO WAY the media could continue to ignore his message. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. E.O.B. = Executive Office Building -- the big Victorian building next
to the White House -- The vice president's office, among others, is located there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Got it, thanks!
:D :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. You're more than welcome.
The acronyms get confusing even to those who have worked in Washington for many years. It's not unusual to draw a blank.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Executive Office Building, I think that's where the VP's office is?
His message was pretty much stifled in 2004, I'm not sure if that's the campaign or media's fault, but I don't think he wants to go through that again.

But I love your optimism. His message will get out, especially if Obama and Hillary are only separated by 25 delegates :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Yeah, baby!!
:bounce: I'm all about optimism. It's my nature. :D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. If he hasn't done it now, he won't do it until we have a clear nominee
Which, at the rate we are going, may not happen until the convention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Isn't the convention a deadline, of sorts, for him? In terms of releasing his delegates?
I get a bit fuzzy on all that stuff....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. He can go to the convention with his delegates
He could go into the convention with his delegates, as there's no rule saying he has to release them even though he's no longer competing in any primaries.

AFAIK, he can "release" the delegates or endorse somebody else, but his delegates are not bound to support his endorsee. Usually the delegates follow the endorsement of their pledged candidate, but there's not a rule that requires them to do so.

I imagine he's seeing the possibility of a brokered convention, or is waiting until the last minute to make a deal. Which is a damn smart political move on his part (VP or AG, maybe?).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. hmmm...is a brokered convention a good thing for the party, though?
I wonder....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. Probably not, which is why nobody likes them
Howard Dean has been making overtures to all sides that they should work out some sort of compromise so we have a nominee picked before the convention.

Quite frankly, I wouldn't mind seeing a brokered convention. We haven't had one since 1960, IIRC. The conventions are such a farce these days anyway, they're little more than pep rallies for political junkies.

I doubt we'll have a brokered convention though. I have a feeling we'll probably have a nominee within a couple weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Maybe we should start up a DU betting pool for when we'll have a clear nominee!
:D
I think we'll know by mid-March sometime...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. I think that's a great idea
You're probably right on with mid-March. Of course now that I've said that there's no way in hell it will happen (my luck with betting sucks)... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't know that it matters much anymore
It might have made a difference before Super Tuesday, but at this point it doesn't seem like it would make much difference. His supporters seem largely to have split themselves between Clinton and Obama, and as time passes, the weight of any endorsement from him decreases more.

Besides, I thought endorsements were not important.

He'll endorse the winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Except that he earned 10% of the vote in California and Oklahoma, and large numbers elsewhere.
No one is noticing the high numbers of protest votes from Democrats who couldn't care less about either candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:25 PM
Original message
Yeah, it's the same ole, same ole from the M$M
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. They'll have to notice those votes if we get to the convention and neither
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:28 PM by Benhurst
candidate has a majority of the delegates. If that is the case, each will be in the awkward position of having had the majority of Democrats vote against him or her in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I wouldn't necessary throw out the value of his endorsment to his supporters
Yes, I'm in CA and have already voted. He was on my ballot and I voted for him....BUT, if he'd come out and endorsed one of the other ones before the vote, it would have made a big difference to me.

There are many states that still have voting to do. It's not done yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. You're right, it wouldn't matter now...
And his silence makes me think he's looking out for his own political future, and doesn't care about giving his supporters the explanation they deserve. Huckabee is still in the race, with less money, so Edwards broke his word WHY??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Huckabee has won 5 states
Or is it 6? That's a whole lot different from having won zero states, and having no prospect of winning a state. That is why Huckabee dares to remain (for a VP slot, or coronation as Conservative King or whatever). Edwards had nothing to gain and everything to lose by remaining in with no wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Well, I still think he should contact those of us who supported him...
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:38 PM by polichick
I'm starting to think people were right when they said he was just an opportunist. He DID promise to stay in until the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. hmmm...I've sometimes wondered why I haven't heard from them (him)
36 hrs before he dropped out, I was getting almost daily emails from his campaign about how he was going all the way to the convention, fighting hard, blah, blah, blah...He was coming to San Jose on Friday and I was planning to go hear/see him in person. I was soo excited....then, overnite, he's out. :wtf: I'm convinced something fishy went down, but we'll never know for sure what it was. We can speculate til the cows come home, but the bottom line is: we lost a great candidate who had a great message.

Anyway, back to my original point: it would have been nice to have rec'd a "good-bye and thanks for your support" type of email from his campaign, after he'd dropped out...especially since we'd been getting so many on a regular basis.

Sigh. Oh well. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Yeah, I heard from them almost every day too...
The silence says a lot ~ I'm no longer sure he WAS a great candidate, or an honest one either.

As you say, Oh well ~ time to move on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. IT's been empirically shown he wasn't given a fair shake by the M$M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think he wants some negotiation power going into the convention..
if he hasn't already, he will endorse by then. Assuming we don't have a Hillbama ticket by that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. I don't understand
What negotiating power does he have by the time the convention rolls around? He has only 26 delegates. I doubt it's going to come down to that--but if it did, that would be even worse than having the 800 Super Delegates decide it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I'm just guessing that at this point..
he's leaving all options on the table. Lots of things could happen in the next month or so. I don't blame him for staying neutral at this point. Nobody knows how this is all going to play out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. I think he should wait and I hope he is AG (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. I guess he'll play his cards accordingly
we'll see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
45. The time has passed where his endorsement would make a significant difference.
Most former Edwards supporters have found a new home.

An endorsement now would have a much smaller effect than the day after he dropped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Well you may be right, but it could still make a difference to those who haven't decided yet
it would make a HUGE difference to me if I lived in one of those states who haven't had their primary yet.

For the record, I live in CA and I voted for him on Tuesday. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poppysgal Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. Why?
:think: He doesn't need to, has Al Gore endorsed anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
50. The time to endorse was just before Super Tuesday
When his supporters hadn't made up their minds.

A bit late to make much of a difference now so I don't think he planned to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poppysgal Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. Doesn't Matter
I voted for Edwards anyway..why because I could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. I voted for Edwards too
:hi: welcome to DU, poppysgal! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Well, you wouldn't be effected by an endorsement but others may have
Not all Edwards supporters are going to vote for him anyway.

At this point, they would just be pissed off if they went to the "other" candidate he didn't endorse, there is so much hostility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
57. here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
58. None of the former Prez candidates
have endorsed yet. Why should JE be different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
59. I'm thinking now that perhaps he had a slip and fall and broke his brain
perhaps he could sue some asphalt manufacturer and then donate the proceedings to a home for old personal injury lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
60. Because Edwards cares about the Democratic party and this country, above all else.
Obama says that his supporters will only vote for HIM, not the Democratic nominee. But Edwards is a Democrat. He won't endorse until we have a nominee, and I'm glad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC