Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton campaign: Childish game-playing goats on acid...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:20 PM
Original message
Clinton campaign: Childish game-playing goats on acid...
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:25 PM by TwoSparkles
Hillary is broke. She's so broke in fact that she had to loan her campaign
several million dollars and publicly disclose that she can't even pay her
own staffers.

In order to compensate for her lack of political vision and preparedness--she
needs to secure loads of free air time.

How to get that free air time? Debates! Lots of them! How about one a week?

In her desperate attempt to garner free air time, Hillary suggests in public
that she and Obama have one debate a week. Obama responds to a reporter by
saying that his time should be spent with the voters, and 18 debates have
been enough.

Ok fine. Hillary wants free media exposure, and she asked. Obama heard
her request and said no, and then moved on with his vigorous campaign schedule.

But what happens when you say "no" to a Clinton request?

Just now, on CNBC, Terry McAuliffe shows up, DEMANDING that Obama debate Hillary
in all of these debates. Plenty of feigned outrage ensued, "If you can't debate Hillary Clinton
on the economy!! How can you fix the economy?? If you can't debate Hillary Clinton on the Iraq war!
How can you stop it??"

McAuliffe then accused Obama of being "afraid of Hillary Clinton."

America...have we had ENOUGH of Hillary Clinton's games, childish tactics and gross distortions?

Because Hillary Clinton didn't prepare and wasn't financially responsible--Barack Obama is supposed
to kow tow to her shrill demands and bow down to her requests?

As backlash for her own financial failures, she's going to insult Barack Obama and question his ability to
"fix the economy or "end the Iraq war"???

:rofl: I tell ya. The Clintons don't know when to quit. They don't get their way and every one
must suffer until their demands are met. They are pathetic.

And please, we all understand that Hillary needs these debates because of her financial troubles and
inability to afford big media buys. Hillary never mentioned another round of debates, until it became
apparent that she was up shit creek without a dollar.

What a bunch of scurrilous, game-playing bullies the Clintons are! This is how she will govern
as President. She'll kick, scream, threaten and lie about whoever doesn't give her exactly
what she wants.

Hillary is Verruca Salt from "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory", "I want that debate and I want it NOW,
and if I don't get it, I'm going to call you names and scream!"

I am so sick and tired of Hillary Clinton's lies, her trickery and her ham-handed bullying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. and another Choral member takes up the meme from headquarters.
Tell me -- do they call you with these talking points, or do they email?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. As a stay-at-home-mom, to two
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:34 PM by TwoSparkles
...girls in elementary school--I stay busy with packing lunches, laundry and
picking up Polly Pockets before I accidentally vacuum them up.

Unfortunately, there isn't a lot of extra time to plot with the campaign mother ship.

However, I'll let you know if they ever call OR email!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. I gather that you have switched candidates now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. IMO all this 'run out of funds' business is triangulation
or, at the very least, an attempt to appear as the underdog. I think its all political game playing designed to manipulate voters; a rope-a-dope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. That thought crossed my mind as well.
Calculating is as calculating does. sad eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. How does being an underdog help her at all?
Maybe she wants to be the underdog, but how does that help her?

I think she is doing this by neccesity.

What does Hillary Clinton, a women who was annointed to be the Democratic nominee months ago, have to gain by being called the underdog?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Apparently, $6 million in new donations from her sympathizers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. The Clintons are at their best when they are percieved as underdogs.
I dunno about anointed though, if she was given the nod by anybody, it was the M$M months ago, lead by RW nutbags spelling doom and gloom that Hillary Clinton would run. And she did.

Plus we, the base, love underdogs. Hell, rooting for underdogs is an American tradition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. He *should* debate her on the economy...
Considering what a shining jewel of fiscal responsibility her campaign has become. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. He was right from the standpoint of the Clinton camp
But why should Obama agree to that much free air time for Hillary. After all, it isn't like people haven't seen enough debates between the two:shrug: Rather he should agree to perhaps one a month for the next few months, at most, and let the Clinton campaign pay for the rest of her exposure.

Obama is under no obligation to bail Hillary out of the mess she got herself into. She opted for the strategy of going all out until Super Tuesday, thinking that with a massive cash blitz, a front loaded primary and her coat of inevitability, she would knock out the rest of the candidates by the day after Super Tuesday. Surprise, she didn't knock them all out, and now is in a fight for her political life against a smart, smooth and savvy political operator, held back by the fact that she currently hasn't got a plan B and is going up against an smoothly oiled money machine while she herself is struggling to find funds.

The question becomes whether or not she can recover in time, and recover enough to stay close enough to let her super delegates get the nomination for her in a seriously undemocratic way.

Obama is under no obligation to help her out, and he's smart enough not to. That's the way politics is:shrug:

By the by, it is good to see you back and in such fine fettle yourself. Hope everything is going alright for you and yours:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. We Haven't Seen Enough.
And the whole 'free airtime' thing is ridiculous in my opinion. I mean, aren't we all in the camp that campaigns should be reformed to begin with and it shouldn't be about who has the money, but rather about substance? What does free airtime have to do with anything? Doesn't he get that same airtime? Statements like that prove ONE thing to me: Obama fans KNOW that the free airtime is more valuable to her camp, because she's the one that comes out looking like the superior candidate during debates. If it was the other way around, the whole 'free airtime' meme wouldn't be spouted at all, since that airtime would be to benefit Obama. What people don't realize is that EVERY SINGLE TIME they spout out that line, they are in essence ADMITTING that Hillary is stronger in the debates and that Obama loses part of his mystique in them. That's the only logical way in which a 'free airtime' argument makes any sense, if that airtime benefits her over Obama. But the argument is bullshit anyway, since as part of a competent political process more emphasis should be put on what's REAL, such as the real setting of one on one debates, than anything else.

And I don't think we've seen enough. We've seen only 1 one on one with them. I would LOVE to see more down to the issues one on one debates between them both, and think that should be the primary interest during this process. I think one on one debates do far better jobs of displaying differences and strengths of each candidate, than do rhetoric driven stump speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. First of all, don't think that I'm in the Obama camp, I'm not
However I do find the notion of Hillary in office absolutely a disgrace, and thus am left with the choice of the lesser of two evils, again.

But back to the question, why should Obama do a debate a week? After all, even when it was seven candidates in the race, most of the air time was spent on Obama and Hillary. Sure, one a month, I can see that, but one a week is just excessive.

It is also impractical from the Obama camp's POV. It gives Hillary free airtime at a point where she is desperate for it. Hell, Obama can pay for all the airtime he wants, so why not force Hillary to do the same? Sorry, but it makes perfect tactical sense.

And no, the Obama camp isn't admitting that Obama is a weaker debater than Hillary, I think that going back and looking at their previous dust ups will prove that. Again, they are making a tactical move here, forcing Hillary, who is weaker in campaign cash, to pay for her exposure when she can least afford it. Obama has all the cash that he needs to keep up his exposure, he doesn't need the debates, so why should he help out his opponent? Again, it comes down to a matter of tactics, ie keep kicking your opponent when they're down.

This is a purely tactical decision. I imagine that we will see future one on one debates, but I doubt that it will be more than one a month. Once a week is excessive, and it benefits Hillary more. Why should the Obama camp play into Hillary's hands?

But hey, if you want to jump up and down, calling Obama and his followers all kinds of names, go for it. I seriously doubt that it will make any difference at all, and the fact remains that Obama is conducting a pretty good tactical campaign so far, why should he stop now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another great post by TwoSparkles
Of course, it will immediately be slammed down as untrue by the Hillbots, when it is in fact 100% correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. 100% correct? Check the first two sentences
"Hillary is broke." Wrong.

She's so broke in fact that she had to . . . publicly disclose that she can't even pay her own staffers. Wrong. The staffers had 'offered' to go without pay, but their offer was turned down. The campaign is flush with new donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. starts out with a lie
"Hillary is broke."

Feb. 7, 2008

So it turns out the Clinton campaign may not be so cash-strapped after all — at least not at this very moment.

After offering on Wednesday to go without paychecks to help save precious campaign resources, senior staff members on Hillary Clinton's campaign are in fact not going without pay during the month of February, ABC News has learned.

The campaign announced today that it raised more than four million dollars online in the 24 hours after polls closed on Tuesday — the biggest single haul in one day ever for the campaign.

The Clinton campaign has enough money on hand now to launch television advertising in multiple states.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4257358&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Sinister Donating Member (503 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
14.  you must understand; 4 mil is nothing, because Barak raised 6. She's broke and riding Greyhound!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. um excuse me
but it was 7 and a half million to her 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary knows that Obama will build unstoppable momentum with Victories in the weeks ahe
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 03:35 PM by JackORoses
She is grasping for anything to attempt to break this Momentum up.

Fuck you and your Debates, Hillary!
The Obama Train is taking it straight to the People. See if you can keep up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Simply amazing...the cult of Obama Lemmings...
just a few weeks ago were raging at Hillary because of all the money she had collected. She was castigated and BBQed for her collections.

Now they switch tactics and are bashing Hillary for running short of PRIMARY money. She has funds for the GE, just short for the end of primary season.

They castigated her unmercifully for being 'cold and calculating' for quite a while. When she appeared human, with normal human emotion showing, they reversed course and slammed her for that.

Many candidates loan their campaign money: Kerry and Romney for just two. But the Obama folk have decided that Hillary should not do that.

If only you folks would be consistant.

The list is long. Flip-flops from the Obama camp are to be expected.

Why not try to be fair? I know it is hard for you guys, but you might try. An election is not a stampede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Hayu_guys, you didn't address the Phantom debates question
It is obvious that Hillary is desperate for these Phantom Debates.
She needs the Media attention.
She needs something to dilute the stream of good news about all Obama's coming victories.

Sorry, Hillary, you'll just have to make due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's time to lose the Clintons, McUseless, and the entire DLC
Cut the head off the snake by getting them out of this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Absolutely K&R. This post needs to be kept kicked as long as the "Obama Afraid" MEME is parroted
here by people who support her disgusting, underhanded and bullying tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. I want debates. I don't feel I know Obama. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Then find a friend who Tivo'ed the first 17 debates...
...and watch them all.

Report back here with your findings.

There will be a quiz.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Cute sarcasm doesn't answer the objection that I don't feel I know BO. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm sick of the slander from the Clinton camp...
I've heard enough debates, town hall meetings with the people are much better. If Hillary's out of $$ it isn't Obama's fault and he shouldn't give in. Everytime the Clinton camps gets in trouble they start slandering Obama and acting the the great victims. To hell with that.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. So what are you going to do? Hold your breath? Stamp your feet?


Have at it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Please God Let It Be The Former
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. It seems to me that you are right....
the money thing didn't hit me until after lunch, now we're hearing smacktalk about the mathematics of superdelegate support.

I have committed publicly that I will call it everytime I see it by people who know and act better. This is the most pathetic attempt I've heard of in trying to marginalize their worthy opponent. It's disgusting, and believe me, they are not on acid; it's pure arrogance, anger and adreneline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC