Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Filling in the Ovals on LA County's Super Tuesday 'Double Bubble' Debacle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:19 PM
Original message
Filling in the Ovals on LA County's Super Tuesday 'Double Bubble' Debacle


Filling in the Ovals on LA County's Super Tuesday 'Double Bubble' Debacle
Confusion Reigns, Legal Challenges Loom as Hundreds of Thousands Votes May Not be Counted Due to Maddeningly Confusing Ballot Design, Procedures


We believe we've can now pull this issue up out of the weeds a bit, after more than 24 hours of trying to make sense of what the Los Angeles County Registrar's office has been describing to the media as "real clear".

What's clear, is that the only thing that's clear is the fact that the county's new acting Registrar of Voters, Dean Logan has seriously blown his first outing since coming South from his disastrous 2004 Washington state gubernatorial election debacle.
Unless swift action is taken by Logan and CA Sec. of State Debra Bowen, it's likely that hundreds of thousands of voters will have been disenfranchised in last Tuesday's Democratic Primary Election.

Please read on for the complete, astounding story...

COMPLETE STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5665


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, California has a lot of swell people in it, but that crowd elected AHHH-Nuld.
Which is kind of ....... interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. How do you know that they elected Arnold Schwarzenegger? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. How do you know they didn't? No one challenged the results, did they? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeforChange Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. There you have it... What happened in California. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep. All those disenfranchised independent Latino voters...
Clinton's margin may have been even larger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. How do you know how the Latino voters in Los Angeles voted? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Check the exit polls. CNN had a detailed breakdown up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fuckers gave me the wrong ballot?
It appears that my vote was counted, but shit, they can't hand me the right ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. See "California Election Integrity Assessment 2008," at
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4380748

...for detail on CA's and Los Angeles' election system. In L.A., 4 million voting cards are hauled to one location--the election office in Norwalk-- before any tallying takes place--and then are all dumped into the maw of what is probably a Diebold GEMS tabulator, run on "TRADE SECRET," PROPRIETARY programming code, and, if it's Diebold (the county won't say), owned and controlled by a corporation with very close ties to the Republican Party and the Bush/Cheney regime. But Diebold or not, it's "TRADE SECRET" vote tabulation, in a highly SECRETIVE process that citizen activists have yet been permitted to see even the outside dumb box of, let alone the innards.

And, considering who the head of elections in L.A. has been, for over a decade--leader of the pack of corrupt county officials who have viciously resisted and sabotaged all efforts of election reform and transparency--Conny McCormack (who resigned Dec 07)--and, given that her hand-picked successor, Dean Logan, is now in charge in L.A., it is no surprise at all to see a major disenfranchisement mess like this develop...and, lo and behold, one that hurts the contender (Obama) against a major corporate shill (Clinton). But I have to say this about McCormack--her service to Diebold, ES&S and co., was smoother than Logan's. I suspect they've been shaving votes off from good government candidates for years in L.A., and (s)electing the corrupt ones (and helping to (s)elect them, in state and national races).

You can't review Conny McCormack's history and that of her buds in San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Contra Costa and other "bad actor" counties, and not realize that something's up. The bare facts of the election system tell you that: It's egregiously non-transparent. Add the activism of these county registrars in suing secretaries of state to prevent modest reforms, and everything else they've done (sales brochures for Diebold; driving SoS Kevin Shelley out of office, after he sued Diebold for fraud in 2004), and the case becomes overwhelming--mindbogglingly overwhelming--that our votes are not secure, and the results cannot be trusted.

Our new reforming SoS Debra Bowen has only been in office a year--and already McCormack is carping at her and bad-mouthing her reforms. Steve Weir--the head of the county registrars' lobbying group (and Contra Costa County Registrar), said of Bowen, and I quote, “This election, if it's a failure, it's on her.”

Weir - 8/12/07
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20070812-9999-1n12bowen.html

And here's McCormack's diatribe of five days ago:
http://www.whittierdailynews.com/ci_8153626?source=rss

And here's a gaggle of them--Weir, Deborah Seiler, Registrar of San Diego (and former chief salesperson for Diebold in Calif--no kidding), with SB and Riverside cited, predicting slow returns and blaming that on SoS Bowen's reforms. Instead of urging patience, and saying, 'Having a paper ballot and better auditing is good," they emphasize the problems and Seiler even laments having to protect paper ballots from the rain (apparently predicted at that time, although I wonder whose 10-day forecast she was consulting, cuz there wasn't any rain). I think she just wanted to pile on the horrible complications of having to count some actual ballots, and having to follow the law, and she it was who instigated the lawsuit against SoS Bowen, to stop better auditing rules. (Seiler & co. lost that lawsuit, fortunately, 1/29/08.) These are McCormack's cohorts talking.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_8157074?source=rss

And here are links to those articles and more discussion of them:

"Election Reform, Fraud and Related News. Sunday 02/03/08"
(Comments 2,16 and 7)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x496612

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC