Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Kerry won every state Obama has won

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:44 AM
Original message
John Kerry won every state Obama has won
Except for South Carolina. There is a myth here which brilliantly turns Obama's success in the states with the highest proportion of DLC kind of Democrats into a strength. The theory is if Obama won Idaho and Utah in the primaries he will do so in the general. Too bad John Kerry existed. Kerry won red states before he lost them. Winning Democratic votes, even Al From Democrats, in primaries suggests nothing about winning independent and Republican votes in those states in the general. Both candidates will win the Democratic vote in Idaho and Utah. Both will lose the rethug and indie vote in those states as well in the general.

Here are Kerry's wins while the race was still competitive (it ended on Super Tuesday in March):

Iowa, New Hampshire, Arizona, Delaware, Missouri, New Mexico, North Dakota, Michigan, Washington, Maine, Tennessee, Virginia, DC, Nevada, Wisconsin, Hawaii, Idaho, Utah, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Massachussetts, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, and Rhode Island.

The only states he lost during this time were South Carolina, Oklahoma, and Vermont. This was not exactly a prelude to a Kerry landslide in November...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dude he also won NY, MA, AZ all the ones Hillary won
Does that mean she can't win too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. That means Kerry should have won in a landslide
The argument post-Obama's DLC dominance is that his red state wins show he can win those states in the general. It also assumes Obama will hold onto all the Kerry states against McCain, a popular candidate who won blue states in his primaries. Kerry won red states, blue states, and swing states. If Obamites are right Kerry should have won in a landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't Kerry lose Iowa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. no
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 12:51 AM by JI7
at least not in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. No
he won Iowa. It was pretty big news, as I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oh wait, I thought you guys were talking about the GE and not the primary.
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 12:54 AM by JVS
Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry didn't have anywhere near the # of independents and rethugs that Obama's getting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Um, when you call Obama voters rethugs...
are you saying it's a good thing or a bad thing.

Don't insult your candidate's voters - use neutral language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. it's a bad thing that they were republicans, but a great thing that they're going over to obama
but I will try to use more neutral language in the future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Kerry won the independent vote in the general
He didn't do well among rethugs but no one seriously expects Obama to get beyond 15% of rethugs in the general, and even that would be under the most favorable of scenarios.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Really, we just have to do a little better than Kerry in the swing states, while
keeping our usual states. Look at the excitement and interest in Obama's candidacy--did Kerry have that going for him? I don't remember it, if he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Kerry also didn't lose the Democratic primary popular vote nationally
The excitement/interest applies to Hillary too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I think it applies to her as well, I agree. Just comparing Kerry and Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. The goal is really purple states, like Colorado and Iowa and New Mexico and Arizona.
Look at the turnouts/demographics there for a better picture--the DNC sure is. The only thing that Obama winning big in the reddest/rural states proves is that people there like him more than her--not necessarily that those places will swing our way. It's more of an indicator of who might do better, among certain types of voters, in a general election matchup, rather than a predictor of winning those states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. That isn't what the spin has been since Super Tuesday
The spin is that DLC Democrats loving Obama shows he will win red states in the general. Obama may very well have more crossover appeal than Hillary but the "he won DLC states big!" argument is ludicrous. He also lost most blue states, including all the big ones except his home state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. I don't think he'll lose any big blue states--it's not going to happen.
I do think he'll flip some purples, and if we're lucky, a red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. We can't discount McCain. He may win some blue states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Apples and oranges.
Maybe you haven't noticed, we're turning out HUGE numbers nationwide. About 30% more than the last go-round.

With the far right nuts sitting it out, we're going to score an impressive victory.

Unless Hillary is the nominee, then the far right won't be sitting it out any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. The far right will vote like they do every year
If Obama is the nominee the rethugs will finally go after him and his negatives will rise as fast as Kerry's did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. LOL! You guys get more and more desperate. Kerry won 46 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. And only 21 in the general. Thanks for making the point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Excellent points.
And you are right about Republicans going after Obama. He ain't seen nothing yet and he has no experience handling it.

Hillary Clinton has, as she has said, taken this incoming fire for 15 years or more. She’s had her patriotism questioned, her sexuality questioned, been accused of being a murderer, been accused of much more and yet she’s still strongly contending for the Democratic nomination for President.

She’s tougher than boot leather while having a human side. Those are assets that a Democratic candidate needs. Hillary Clinton has developed thick skin and the ability to remain calm in campaign combat. Yet, she also knows how to listen to the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. no offense
but that's the dumbest analogy ever.

Here's what happened on Super Tuesday

Kerry Edwards

CA: 64-20
CT 58-24
GA 47-42
MD 60-26
MA 72-18
MN 51-27
NY 61-20
OH 52-34
RI 71-19

Before Super Tuesday Kerry won AZ by 16, DE by 40, MO by 26, NM by 21, ND by 27, VA by 25...

Do i need to go on? What about the 2004 primaries looks anything like the 2008 primaries?

The race was over in January and we all knew it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
17. let's not forget the Diebold and Blackwell effect and voter suppression in Ohio in 04
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 01:00 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC